ESPN 710 Took my Call on Coaching Search...

HeretoBeatmyChest

HeretoBeatmyChest

New Fish
I said Peterson is a fallback guy, Nuss is Sark part2 & makes me want to vomit, said look at DeRuyter, Dantonio & Bohl.

They are answering my Peterson concern. Brock & Danny both like him and think the hire would be received well nationally. They think he would have the desire to win championships.

Brock is hearing rumors on Peterson.
 
Since pool boy doesn't have the balls to go after an actual big fish I would be ok with Petersen over Nuss. At least we are getting a head coach who will have a talented team and we would be able to Judge him after 1 year if he really is or isn't the guy.
 
I have a hard time putting DeRuyter above Petersen, and I like DeRuyter. DeRuyter has been a winner for two seasons. Petersen has been a winner his whole coaching career, has a good record against Pac 12 teams, and has won BCS bowls. I get the fear of the Boise State coaches, and the arrow at Boise seems to be pointing down, but Petersen has been a winner. It's almost like people have gotten sick of him because he has done it so long in the same place.
 
I have a hard time putting DeRuyter above Petersen, and I like DeRuyter. DeRuyter has been a winner for two seasons. Petersen has been a winner his whole coaching career, has a good record against Pac 12 teams, and has won BCS bowls. I get the fear of the Boise State coaches, and the arrow at Boise seems to be pointing down, but Petersen has been a winner. It's almost like people have gotten sick of him because he has done it so long in the same place.
Click to expand...

I am probably the most anti-Deruyter on this bored. I would take him over Nuss for sure but I also like Petersen more. I mean if people are going to give Petersen shit for winning in a baby conference how does that not apply to Deruyter as well?

A lot of his wins aren't that impressive either, they had to take the almighty Rutgers to OT to beat them this year.
 
I have a hard time putting DeRuyter above Petersen, and I like DeRuyter. DeRuyter has been a winner for two seasons. Petersen has been a winner his whole coaching career, has a good record against Pac 12 teams, and has won BCS bowls. I get the fear of the Boise State coaches, and the arrow at Boise seems to be pointing down, but Petersen has been a winner. It's almost like people have gotten sick of him because he has done it so long in the same place.
Click to expand...

I just worry that we are buying Peterson at his top. I think DeRuyter would have more energy and desire. Of course these are the things that the AD has to figure out. Peterson would at least be received very well in local and national circles.

Edit- People from Boise in 2005 were saying Peterson was the guy behind the success and not Hawkins.
 
Last edited:
Dan Hawkins looked like a pretty good coach in 2005
Click to expand...

When Hawkins left Boise the knowledgeable fans were NOT unhappy to see him go. They were, however, ecstatic that Petersen was taking over. Petersen was the man at Boise even before he was THE man. Hire Pete if you can get him.
 
Petersen is a fucking home run compared to the dreck we're interviewing.

I'll teeter for Peter
 
You got your 15 msecondsof fame u worthles cuuuuunt. Hey I called the sports babe back in the 90's to call Nason Bass the geek of the week for choosing baseball. Wish I had an opportunity to tell everybody I was on the radio. Your the geek of the week
 
With Peterson can our slogan be comPETE? Since it's so original.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top