ESECPN in full spin mode...

[dnc]

The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2

The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.

Water is wet.

But how is PGOS a terrorist socialism muslim hipster douchebag that hates America?

I thought that was implied by the Cal avatar?

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2

The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.

Water is wet.

How about we let it play out.

Big Ten is easily the best conference so far.

 

[RaceBannon]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

 

[RoadDawg55]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

 

[RaceBannon]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

 

[RoadDawg55]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

 

[RaceBannon]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached as well and managed to NOT make the playoffs yet again, Hogan is a journeyman at best, like most SEC quarterbacks. They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule. So yes, they could beat Bama, but like Ole Miss they would end up with nothing to show for it.

 

[AZDuck]

The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2

The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.

Water is wet.

But how is PGOS a terrorist socialism muslim hipster douchebag that hates America?

butt is he a fuckanus?

 

[dnc]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

Cant make this shit up. College football has nothing to do with just winning or losing anymore. Back in the good ole days, before 80% of you puckerhuffers here even watched the game, you won the title by WINNING. And winning RECENTLY when it mattered. If you lost recently you could kiss your ass goodbye.

Now, literally in the last few weeks, its about how you won vs the top 40. Throw out the AP top25, guess its irrelevant now as it hurts the SEC. Remember the SEC had 10 teams in top25? Now there is basically one that deserves to be there, so that poll doesnt matter for the playoff. What a laugher but I digress.

Its not that you won, its about how good your backups are if a starter goes down (which is purely subjective and no way to know) Even though you won a game, the committee now decides if THEY think your backups can compete in the playoff.

Iowa is undefeated but t he committee decides if THEY think iowa is good enough. The committee made up its mind about Bama pre-season, even though everyone outside the SEC saw they have the worst QB of all power 5 contenders, beat 1 ranked team, lost at home to ole miss and needed a miracle at home vs horrible tennessee. Oh and barely beat Auburn (the 2nd-3rd worst team in SEC.

Make it stop. Nothing has to do with winning and more importantly losing anymore. The silly metrics, SEC bias and a woman deciding who the best teams are is ludicrous. Im about ready to bid farewell to the new and unimproved college game. Cant stand it. Onne way to keep my interest? Put Bama at 5 tonight when rankings come out. Make them beat Florida Atlantic un SEC title game this weekend to even be considered. There a 4 MUCH MORE DESERVING TEAMS right now.

 

[EwaDawg]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

 

[PurpleJ]

The SEC is so good that FSU buttfucked Florida to the tune of 27 to 2

The SEC East blows. The SEC West is really good.

Water is wet.

But how is PGOS a terrorist socialism muslim hipster douchebag that hates America?

butt is he a fuckanus?

I'm gonna start calling @PostGameOrangeSlices "POS" because he has no game.

 

[RaceBannon]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

Hope this helps

 

[EwaDawg]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

Hope this helps

FYFMFE. You quoted before I could change the SEC miss # to 5. Ole miss can't play themselves or I should've said three for the PAC.

I understood, when I posted, that you were under the totally mistaken impression that the SEC is better than the P12. Repeating untruths does not make false statements true.

Sagarin agrees that Stanford's schedule is tougher than Ole Misses (sic).

Good luck with that aids thingy.

 

[Kaepsknee]

I do agree that the B1G should have 2 if MSU beats Iowa. Ohio State could win it all

Bama is the clear #1 seed. Then Ohio State. Then Michigan State and rap it with Oklahoma who I told tequila weeks ago would run his little shithole Baylor, TCU and Okie State teams.

Ole Miss is a GOOD football team. Would win the Pac 12.

2013 wants your world order view of College Football back. Bama got trucked by a BIG team last year and isn't near as good as they were then, this year. And fucking Miss is not winning the Pac 12 this year. While the Pac 12 lacked a dominant team this year, it featured 9 teams that could beat top 15 team any week. Unlike the SEC who's former power schools such as Auburn, Tenn, Georgia, Missouri all made it possible for a team like Florida, who cant score on air to not only be in the SEC title game but also be somehow in the natty picture. Bama may deserve to squeak in as a 4 seed if they can some how muster to score the 13 pts needed it will take to beat Florida. But that isn't based on merit, it's based on reputation this year.

To say this isn't a huge dropoff year for the SEC trumps even Doog logic.

 

[Kaepsknee]

SRS is probably an invention of a SEC geek.

We don't give a fuck about stats. We only count natties (7 in a row). Stats are for loser Pac-12 fans to try and justify why their conference hasn't produced a winner besides USC for over 25 years. Stats are for those who go 7-6 in the PAC and want to win the SRS natty.

That's rich. Obscure stats are being used to prop up the SEC in this very thread.

****No they aren't. Bama is #2 and in the playoffs. Nothing else matters

****

Now Race forms a fake SEC-Alabama allegiance to get attention. Sorry dude, J already took that spot last year at this time. Maybe try the hated duck fan persona, you might find some action Race.

Its one thing to be a real southern, SEC fan who really believes in the bullshit and the conference. Its another thing to be a Warshintonion, born at Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, have a silver spoon rammed up your rectum your whole live, then become an SEC fan in the last year and pretend to dispute Puppy's accurate shit, with the intention of luring suckers in to boost your post total.

Game up Race. J's game was up a year ago. Dont fall into that horrible trap. Youre an ok wussy, just stick to what got you here.

J, your posts are so bad, the trolling for steelhead so obvious, I dont even respond anymore. This Is youre future if you dont wisup Race.

Puppy good at everything.[/QUOTE]

Race can always hang on to the old tired "logic" that is, "If neither USC nor UW wins the Pac 12, it was a shitty year for the conference.

 

[Kaepsknee]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

Hope this helps

And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.

 

[RaceBannon]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

Hope this helps

And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.

Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

Coogs gonna doog

 

[Kaepsknee]

We know the top level of the PAC unless it is USC can't compete against the SEC champ. The bottom battle between Vandy and Colorado might just go Colorado's way.

The middle would actually be interesting. How would Washington do against Arkansas? Utah against LSU. Florida against UCLA. Texas A&M beat ASU this year and both teams pretty much suck but UW couldn't beat ASU for a decade.

I think Oregon would beat a lot of SEC teams, but not the ones that matter when it counts the most.

The record speaks for itself. I don't give a shit about conference strength or strength of schedule. Bama losing to Utah in 2008 has nothing to do with 3 rings under Saban as part of the 7 straight. You can't spin it away no matter how hard doogs here try.

That's why you're doog fucking losers and fans of a doog fucking loser program that once could aspire to be the best but now just looks for reasons why REAL winners suck and losers like UW and the Pac 12 are SRS champs

Water remains wet and UW remains a loser because we have lots of really cool excuses. And by the way our QB play has sucked for a decade as well.

UW sucks. That has nothing to do with this. Stanford would be #2 in the SEC rather easily. They might even beat Bama.

Nope. Stanford is another Ole Miss or Mississippi State in the SEC

They barely survived WSU

And Bama lost at home to Ole Miss and barely beat Tennessee. Ole Miss is inconsistent and poorly coached. Miss State beat nobody. It's a long season and there isn't a dominant team this year. Stanford is rather easily better than both of those teams. Stanford's OL and McCaffrey are good in any conference. Hogan would be one of, if not the best QB in the SEC.

Stanford is poorly coached. . . . . They are exactly like Ole Miss with an easier schedule.

Northwestern, Notre Dame and UCF is easier than UT-Martin, Fresno and New Mexico State?

Five road games is easier than four road games?

Missing two teams from the P12 is easier than missing six from the SEC?

NO. NO. and NO.

Its official. The FBA has gotten to Race (again).

Stanford plays the Pac 12 north

Hope this helps

And the 3 teams from the Pac 12 N beat USC. Even WSU swept the Pac 12 S.

The Pac 12 N is stronger than the SEC East this year. Check who beat who.

Your string of repeating everything that everyone else said in this thread while misquoting me was going along quite nicely until this piece of shit post.

Coogs gonna doog

Oh so you weren't fluffing SC earlier in this thread?

Today, Racebannon, you are the fucking King of Doog Island

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

The "You're a loser Doog if you don't buy into the SEC hype" is a big deflection. If you're losing an argument, name call.

I don't hate Florida St or Ohio St because they won anything.

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

race got fucking destroyed on this, sorry pal