Ektard's Thesis is Complete

bananasnblondes

bananasnblondes

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam
Apparently every 4 and 5 star player UW was after was coming to UW if Sark stayed, even the ones who were no longer considering UW. Of course he's not trying to throw the new staff under the bus, he just had to give Sark one last rusty trombone
 
Guys some of this is 2nd and 3rd had info but his sources are amazing, so it is totally not speculation and all about FACTS.

And amazingly these guys that never talk about UW or mention them in their top schools are just lying and are going to shock da world!

Ektard has the facts and you can't dispute them. Now go suck his dick for providing you with amazing info.
 
I remember Eklund saying this wasn't going to be a great class, even if we won 10. He said 10 wins would propel next years class though. These guys are getting worse and worse.
 
I guess we are fucked for 2015 too. Now FFF only gets to tell us leads jumping jacks. Nobody is ever going to come here now cause we lost seven win steve who once won 8 games. We're fucked. fucked fucked fucked.

Fuck
 
The dumbest thing was that we were always recruiting those players. We always were going to come in third or fourth for their signature.

I put no credence in kids telling coaches they want to come to a certain school. The coaches press the kids into saying that shit. It's tough for a 17 year old to stand up to grown adults who are well versed in sales. The kid eventually goes where he wants and avoids the coaches bothering him, take Myles Jack for example.
 
Last edited:
Guys some of this is 2nd and 3rd had info but his sources are amazing, so it is totally not speculation and all about FACTS.

And amazingly these guys that never talk about UW or mention them in their top schools are just lying and are going to shock da world!

Ektard has the facts and you can't dispute them. Now go suck his dick for providing you with amazing info.
Click to expand...

People just don't understand the "Secret Verbal" process.

81%.

 
let's get back to snickering about Max Browne and Zach Banner and Myles Jack and everyone else avoiding Sarkaholic at UW and now pretending that Sarkaholic was literally on the verge of a monster class. Sit back, pour a merlot that tastes like a zinfandel and set your DVR to auto-record USC games for the next 4 years. Should be fun. ;)

 
Disagree all you want, but we won't be having any of you bash the integrity of our experts.

Again, go ahead and disagree, we encourage it. Any attacks though and you are gone.
 
Does Samek still have controlling interest in that venture? Or did he sell it off to Kimberly and they just let him hang around because he's the "brand name"?

I always found Samek to be doogish but somewhat level headed. Some of you that knew him personally ( @RaceBannon ) could say better. But I can't believe if he does still have stock in doogman that he would let this level of fucking faggotry continue.

Dm.c now has even less cred that crazy cunt from Liberty Lake.....and that's unfathomable.
 
Last edited:
That was a chuckle. He said he was only providing the "concrete stuff", implying that the less concrete stuff was going to be even juicier. I read the entire thing and never ran into anything concrete at all. Just rumors and a tidbit of hyperbole from Sirmon.

Perhaps the concrete stuff is coming in part deux.

Yaledawg pointed out that there was mention of a single line player in the whole report (McGary). It's also worth mentioning that Ecklund's "concrete" info on him was that he never doubted Sark would easily pull him in spite of all the available information pointing toward him leaning elsewhere.

Very revelatory and worthy of all the ball gargling he earned.
 
That was a chuckle. He said he was only providing the "concrete stuff", implying that the less concrete stuff was going to be even juicier. I read the entire thing and never ran into anything concrete at all. Just rumors and a tidbit of hyperbole from Sirmon.

Perhaps the concrete stuff is coming in part deux.

Yaledawg pointed out that there was mention of a single line player in the whole report (McGary). It's also worth mentioning that Ecklund's "concrete" info on him was that he never doubted Sark would easily pull him in spite of all the available information pointing toward him leaning elsewhere.

Very revelatory and worthy of all the ball gargling he earned.
Click to expand...
Premium. Content.

 
When Eklund asks Sirmon "how is recruiting going" what the fuck does he expect Sirmon to say? Of course he is going to say it is going great. It's the same thing with Kim when he asked Tosh about recruiting to USC. It would only cause problems if he told the truth and said yes.

This is why Fleenor, Kim, Fetters, and Eklund are so fucking clueless. They have access to the coaches, but the coaches always lie to them, but these guys report anything they say as fact. It's all because they are dying to be insiders, but it's never going to happen.
 
Last edited:
When Eklund asks Sirmon "how is recruiting going" what the fuck does he expect Sirmon to say? Of course he is going to say it is going great. It's the same thing with Kim when he asked Tosh about recruiting to USC. It would only cause problems if he told the truth and said yes.

This is why Fleenor, Kim, Fetters, and Eklund are so fucking clueless. They have access to the coaches, but the coaches always lie to them, but these guys report anything they say as fact. It's all because they are dying to be insiders, but it's never going to happen.
Click to expand...

Exactly the coaches treat dm.c like their mouthpiece and just spout shit out hoping it sticks on a wall somewhere (for whatever reason, to improve perception of the program or support their job security... etc.).

I'm also starting to wonder if Ektard actually knows the meaning of the word 'fact'.

Stay tuned for parts 2 and 3 of the thesis.... we will get his expert analysis of where recruiting is going in the future. Shit's about to get cray cray.

On another note, some fucktard asked Phil Bleenor today what his opinion of the possibility of Jonathan Smith being the OC was... like Bleenor knows anything about coaching football?
 
Guys some of this is 2nd and 3rd had info but his sources are amazing, so it is totally not speculation and all about FACTS.

And amazingly these guys that never talk about UW or mention them in their top schools are just lying and are going to shock da world!

Ektard has the facts and you can't dispute them. Now go suck his dick for providing you with amazing info.
Click to expand...

People just don't understand the "Double Secret Verbal" process.

81%.
Click to expand...

 
All skill guys and very little concrete OL/DL info ...

Lots of 3-star type guys ... which is what Petersen is going to most likely pull in anyway.

The only one that I'll concede is that we "might" have had a shot at Mixon w/ the Sark staff ... but whatever on that. While great RBs are great, they are dependent upon a good OL.

Bottom line is that Sark's still never won more than 5 games in conference and he still devalues the importance of line play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top