Ed Cunningham sucking off on sark on 710

He loved Ty. Back when I listened on KJR he was a weekly guest. Praised Ty to all end.
 
Cunningham is terrible. He was embarrassingly bad one time when announcing an Oregon game against Virginia. No professionalism at all. His Duck hate was pouring out of him. I will say the documentaries he has produced have been good.
 
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

 
Last edited:
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

Harbaug and Chimp had a belly laugh over this.
 
Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 5-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

 
Last edited:
I also don't know if Petersen is an upgrade, I mean 92-12 vs 34-29 is basically the same record. Sark definitely doesn't get enough credit for taking a 4-5 conference record team in 2009 to a 5-4 conference record team in 2013, just 5 years later! If you can't see the progress there, then I just can't help you.
 
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

24-21 in the conference is OK at Oregon State.

At WASHINGTON (RIP), it fucking sucks.
 
Ed will say something smart and insightful and then something totally ridiculous.

He spoke highly of UW's DL & defense and said Oregon is just a touch better. He basically intimated that UW should be 1-0 into Eugene and that if a few things go wrong for Oregon (over the course of the year) UW could be in the Pac12 title game.

Then he goes on to blow Sark and say Petersen is a great hire but not an upgrade. Then he says Oregon's strong program is a result of marketing/branding and Rich Brooks set the foundation.

Fixed. Look at the fucking schedule.
 
Sark did an ok job....to say he sucked would be inaccurate. To say he brought us back would be inaccurate also.

We paid him a shitload of money though to do an ok job. A lot of coaches could have done what he did though.....Peterman is an upgrade and anybody that says different needs to DIAFF.

24-21 in the conference is OK at Oregon State.

At WASHINGTON (RIP), it fucking sucks.

If you are going to skew the stats by looking at his entire body of work than I can't help you.
 
Cuntingham will be proven right when Sark gets to 35-29 at USC that includes impressive blowout wins over a handful of FCS schools
 
You guys still have no idea the damage Ty did. Owen Twelve was crippling, and he left no talent on the roster. Sark practically saved Warshington.
 
Back
Top