section8
New Fish
This was a real exchange in the thread about Joe Mixon
Poster: Well looks like we're on the outside looking in on another recruit that we were told was once all about UW
Kim: Don't close the door on Mixon yet. There will be lots of twists and turns in this one.
Poster: Kim, how can you say that UW is still in this? The kid himself says that Oklahoma and Wisconsin are his favorites and UW is barely hanging on.
Kim: I did not say anything about UW
The snake oil is thick in this one
What the fuck does this mean? I'm assuming the poster is interested in the kid attending UW, is directed not to "close the book on him," yet Kim didn't say anything about UW?
The fuck?
What a fucking tool. Is this his way of riding the fence so he can say he was right if the kid commits (extremely doubtful), but will also be right because the kid commits elsewhere and he "didn't say anything about UW?"
What a fucking asshole.
That is the same shit that Ectard does all the time, taking one line of a post where the intended context is obvious to anyone that reads beyond a 3rd grade level, twisting it around and trying to argue the validity of the entire post and then when he gets owned reverting back to "I said this one sentence was incorrect".
They're all really bad at it hence the pompous holier than thou attitude and ban hammer.