Doogman fumbles the RappCulture Commit. Butthurt ensues

Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.

But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.

Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.

Screenshots or it isn't true ...

And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?

81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.

Same day, Rapp commits.
 
Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.

But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.

Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.

Screenshots or it isn't true ...

And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?

81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.

Same day, Rapp commits.

Dialed in as always ...

Disappointing that nobody on this bored didn't take the comments from Mr 81% and predict a Rapp commit.
 
Of course Rapp committed yesterday. Scott's blog from just that morning stated that Rapp's timeline had been pushed out.

But he boldly predicted with 81% certainty that it would happen by summer.

Eklund seal of approval. 81%of the time it works every time.

Screenshots or it isn't true ...

And un-fucking-believable ... how can you be THAT bad at your job?

81% also said that UW has a lot of work to do to get Rapp's commitment. Stanford is hard to beat and all that.

Same day, Rapp commits.

Dialed in as always ...

Disappointing that nobody on this bored didn't take the comments from Mr 81% and predict a Rapp commit.

Pretty someone on a different thread restated Ek-Tard's prediction and then said that Rapp was a UW lock.
 
Back
Top