Doctors cover up vaccine damage after killing infant with 8 simultaneous vaccinations

[pawz]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

 

[2001400ex]

1. How much money do tobacco [drug] companies make from [cigarettes] vaccines?

2. How much do they give to politicians' reelection campaigns?

3. Who passes the laws giving free cigarettes to the military and to the public on street corners [making vaccines MANDATORY]?

4. Who pays for the tobacco subsidies and the studies that say they're safe?

Wow death, I never figured you'd be on the side of the liberal hippy.

 

[allpurpleallgold]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

I'm agreeing with apag...
Fyfmfe

 

[whatshouldicareabout]

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

Holy fucking shit. I really want sigs back so this could be my sig.

Derek?

 

[dflea]

pawz and d2d are couple dumbfucks on the same intellectual level as Jenny McCarthy.

Go fuck yourselves and then DIAFF - or of measles, mumps or rubella, you fucking idiots. You're pathetic.

Does the medical evidence mean nothing to you? Opt out of vaccinations - and send your little typhoid Mary offspring to a leper colony offshore with all the rest of the dumbasses who believe in Jenny McCarthy rather than the studies that prove that vaccinations pose a minimal threat compared to a very real risk of not vaccinating.

For 10's of thousands of years, the life expectancy was 30 to 50 years old, you dumbasses. If you die at 35, we won't have to listen to your anti-vaccination bullshit and you won't breed any more dipshits.

 

[2001400ex]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

Why did you only put the last two paragraphs in bold? The whole post was FS.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

pawz and d2d are couple dumbfucks on the same intellectual level as Jenny McCarthy.

Go fuck yourselves and then DIAFF - or of measles, mumps or rubella, you fucking idiots. You're pathetic.

Does the medical evidence mean nothing to you? Opt out of vaccinations - and send your little typhoid Mary offspring to a leper colony offshore with all the rest of the dumbasses who believe in Jenny McCarthy rather than the studies that prove that vaccinations pose a minimal threat compared to a very real risk of not vaccinating.

For 10's of thousands of years, the life expectancy was 30 to 50 years old, you dumbasses. If you die at 35, we won't have to listen to your anti-vaccination bullshit and you won't breed any more dipshits.

In defense of Jenny McCarthy....

Her rack is still spectacular.

 

[HuskyJW]

I like pawz....but I couldn't disagree with him more.

 

[pawz]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

If you like the way you think, you can keep it.

I agree the logic in the first half of the bolded is whimsical. But you don't address any of the logic of the rest of the post.

You just ascribe, without question, to the fear-based sales pitch of those who have drugs to sell. Just like the fear-based pitch of global warming. Just like the fear based pitch of the anti-gun movement. Just like the fear-based pitch of western mono-theism.

Fear is the easiest way to control masses.

 

[Blackie]

For 10's of thousands of years, the life expectancy was 30 to 50 years old, you dumbasses.

And then man became civilized and developed clean drinking water, and kept it separated from the sewage. Health improved. Life expectancy increased. Widespread vaccination use occurred far after this, and when most diseases were already generally rare and survivable amongst otherwise generally healthy people.

Gates isn't helping people with his vaccination crusade like he'd have you believe. Get them sustainable clean drinking water and functional waste management.

 

[2001400ex]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

If you like the way you think, you can keep it.

I agree the logic in the first half of the bolded is whimsical. But you don't address any of the logic of the rest of the post.

You just ascribe, without question, to the fear-based sales pitch of those who have drugs to sell. Just like the fear-based pitch of global warming. Just like the fear based pitch of the anti-gun movement. Just like the fear-based pitch of western mono-theism.

Fear is the easiest way to control masses.

Why do you discriminate against Ebola,, ISIS, communism/socialism, Obama, liberals, etc.?

 

[pawz]

pawz and d2d are couple dumbfucks on the same intellectual level as Jenny McCarthy.

Go fuck yourselves and then DIAFF - or of measles, mumps or rubella, you fucking idiots. You're pathetic.

Does the medical evidence mean nothing to you? Opt out of vaccinations - and send your little typhoid Mary offspring to a leper colony offshore with all the rest of the dumbasses who believe in Jenny McCarthy rather than the studies that prove that vaccinations pose a minimal threat compared to a very real risk of not vaccinating.

For 10's of thousands of years, the life expectancy was 30 to 50 years old, you dumbasses. If you die at 35, we won't have to listen to your anti-vaccination bullshit and you won't breed any more dipshits.

I haven't been the beneficiary of your sweet-nothings since the old days of Unleashed. I'm waxing nostalgic ...

I always know I'm on to something the more I'm viciously attacked for it. So thanks for my validation.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

As usual you're assuming a blanket statement on my part. Obviously I would be a Honda-esq retard if i choose to ignore the historical benefits of MMR or Polio vaccines. I'll take those.

But for the nouveau-vaccinations of the last 20-30 years, the verdict is out. Especially the yearly flu vaccine that is literally produced a year late - every year - and tends to induce a flu in the vaccinated anyway. But it gets pitched every year by the profit motivated, hiding behind the guise of better health.

Further df, as i recall, you have a special needs child. I don't recall the specifics, but do you see the causation as a random chance? How random is it when you consider birth defects are on an exponential rise over the same 20-30 year period? One MIT professor predicts that HALF of all children will be autistic by 2050. That's fucking nuts and I want some answers.

So what's the cause of the exponential rise? There are only a few variables that are consistent to the same time period, the advent of pharmaceuticals (pills and vaccines) and GMO food. On all fronts what we need is more information. In the interim, I'm willing to take my chances without these nouveau drugs and vaccinations.

If you still feel the need to castigate me as a pariah for being concerned about the long-term effects these foods and drugs, which are only being colored in-favor by special interests that profit by them, then I accept my lot.

At the end of the day, we need more information, by unbiased sources. But since the special profit-minded interests are the only ones willing to foot the bill for said data collection, I expect them to release said information as they see fit.

 

[pawz]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

Why did you only put the last two paragraphs in bold? The whole post was FS.

You had to edit that?

Since you are incapable of providing reasonable counter-points, run along and play, the adults are talking.

 

[DugtheDoog]

I would never argue that the premise of vaccinations don't work. The main problem is the amount of thimerisol or mercury in these vaccines and giving children 10 shots at the same time. It's not safe to put that high level of mercury in your body and can seriously fuck up your brain. Add to that the drug companies' and government willingness over the years to use the population (and especially our own soldiers) as human guinea pigs to test their shit without knowing the effects. Is it really a stretch for someone not to trust the government or drug companies to tell you what's best for you?

 

[PurpleJ]

Christ

 

[2001400ex]

pawz and d2d are couple dumbfucks on the same intellectual level as Jenny McCarthy.

Go fuck yourselves and then DIAFF - or of measles, mumps or rubella, you fucking idiots. You're pathetic.

Does the medical evidence mean nothing to you? Opt out of vaccinations - and send your little typhoid Mary offspring to a leper colony offshore with all the rest of the dumbasses who believe in Jenny McCarthy rather than the studies that prove that vaccinations pose a minimal threat compared to a very real risk of not vaccinating.

For 10's of thousands of years, the life expectancy was 30 to 50 years old, you dumbasses. If you die at 35, we won't have to listen to your anti-vaccination bullshit and you won't breed any more dipshits.

I haven't been the beneficiary of your sweet-nothings since the old days of Unleashed. I'm waxing nostalgic ...

I always know I'm on to something the more I'm viciously attacked for it. So thanks for my validation.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

As usual you're assuming a blanket statement on my part. Obviously I would be a Honda-esq retard if i choose to ignore the historical benefits of MMR or Polio vaccines. I'll take those.

But for the nouveau-vaccinations of the last 20-30 years, the verdict is out. Especially the yearly flu vaccine that is literally produced a year late - every year - and tends to induce a flu in the vaccinated anyway. But it gets pitched every year by profit motivated, hiding behind the guise of health.

Further df, as i recall, you have a special needs child. I don't recall the specifics, but do you see the causation as a random chance? How random is it when you consider birth defects are on an exponential rise over the same 20-30 year period? One MIT professor predicts that HALF of all children will be autistic by 2050. That's fucking nuts and I want some answers.

So what's the cause of the exponential rise? There are only a few variables that are consistent to the same time period, the advent of pharmaceuticals (pills and vaccines) and GMO food. On all fronts what we need is more information. In the interim, I'm willing to take my chances without these nouveau drugs and vaccinations.

If you still feel the need to castigate me as a pariah for being concerned about the long-term effects these foods and drugs, which are only being colored in-favor by special interests that profit by them, then I accept my lot.

At the end of the day, we need more information, by unbiased sources. But since the special profit-minded interests are the only ones willing to foot the bill for said data collection, I expect them to release said information as they see fit.

Speaking of fear getting in the way of reality....

Don't you think diagnosis has a large part in higher autism rates? Haven't you heard any commercials about diagnosing autism?? 30 years ago we just called the child FS. Now we are diagnosing and helping them.

 

[pawz]

I like pawz....but I couldn't disagree with him more.

Respectfully noted.

I have great empathy for and support your position as stated in p1 of this thread. I want what you want in that regard. I just think we are shooting (vaccines) first and asking questions later in the time span of the last 30-50 years.

 

[pawz]

I would never argue that the premise of vaccinations don't work. The main problem is the amount of thimerisol or mercury in these vaccines and giving children 10 shots at the same time. It's not safe to put that high level of mercury in your body and can seriously fuck up your brain. Add to that the drug companies' and government willingness over the years to use the population (and especially our own soldiers) as human guinea pigs to test their shit without knowing the effects. Is it really a stretch for someone not to trust the government or drug companies to tell you what's best for you?

Only HondaFS thinks we should blindly follow. So there is that.

 

[allpurpleallgold]

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/vaccines-work-period/

End of discussion.

sciencebasedmedicine.org is your source?

Is that kind of like naming obamacare the 'Affordable' Care Act even though everyone's prices doubled? I should vote for it before I read it? I'd like to know who is really paying the bills of the 'doctors' behind that website. As usual, the devil is in the details.

The fact is, we just don't know enough yet about the unintended consequences of these various vaccinations. Remember just a few short years ago when an HPV vaccination was a "must-have" and rushed to "market"? And how did that turn out? And i think they now 'recommend' people get it by the time they are 10yo. WTF?!

This is just fucking crazy, rushing to judgement on fear-based thinking.

I find it amusing (sad, not funny haha) that an ultra-liberal like yourself is taking a position that supports immediate corporate profit over taking the time to make sure we have it right - for kids sake.

And I find it similarly amusing, that you think you know what's best for my body, my (future) kid's bodies - which you want to legislate - but you vote pro-choice on the other-side of the same premise.

In my mid-thirties, I don't even have half the vaccinations that are now suggested/required. I'm pretty sure I'll be OK.

Lest we forget the fact that for 10s of thousands of years the human species proliferated exponentially without any sort of modern medicine or vaccination.

This is your problem. This is d2d's problem. And apparently it's DJ's problem. It's not that your stupid. It's that you don't know how to think.

Why did you only put the last two paragraphs in bold? The whole post was FS.

The last two paragraphs best illustrate the point I was making. If I need help being outwitted by d2d I'll let you know. Until then, fuck off.