And half of them are you hitting refresh and commenting how little you care.
Do we doog too much?
- Thread starter whatshouldicareabout
- Start date
And half of them are you hitting refresh and commenting how little you care.
DucksFC
Active poster
Last edited:
I think doog refers to anyone who has posted on Dawgman more than like 15 times and never been given a timeout or had access revoked.
And yes, there has been a lot of doog like commentary here lately. Off-season championships are the only time it is permissible.
And yes, there has been a lot of doog like commentary here lately. Off-season championships are the only time it is permissible.
MikeSeaver
New Fish
Yeah, but that’s not what really happened, is it?
GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
Teh c°
Pitchfork51
Active poster
The stronger the dooging the greater the disappoinment inevitably is
I cherish it
I cherish it
MikeDamone
Well-known poster
HHB and then this place was started to have a doog free place to gather. It’s all fucked up now. Doogs galore
GaearGrimsrud
New Fish
I get it Mike. We all get it. You DON'T care. Maybe make another 2,000 posts about it.
You and Sven going back and forth about nothing was so much better.
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
MikeSeaver
New Fish
The question was whether or not you’re all flaming doogs. I just answered the question.
You seem to have taken it personally. You’re probably right to have done so.
Dooging is the refusal or inability to keep it real, to call a spade a spade, etc. See: Broadcastingdoog calling UW basketball getting blown out at home by an Oregon squad that traveled 7 players "a great effort". Doogs will make excuses for everything, denying the reality beating them in the face.
If Oregon had hired DeBoer, for example, imagine the non stop dooging around here about hiring some nobody from the Mountain West. But since the shoe is on the other foot, the forecast completely changes. That's dooging. He's the same coach today he was a month ago, but depending on what color tie he's wearing everything changes. If Oregon hires Aranda(they won't) it will be "lulz, he won 2 games in 2020", but if UW had hired him it would have been a grand slam.
And yes, the doog is as strong here today as it ever was or is on dawgman or bdtw. See: Broadcastingdoog, bill, haie, btp, huskyjw, insincere, greenriver, etc, etc, etc. People who derive their own egos from the rivalry and are unable to accept certain realities without their world crashing down.
It bums me out, because I DO care and have zero shame admitting it. This place used to be where doogs came to get eviscerated, where the shit wasn't tolerated, yet now dooging is mainstream even here. It's why I poast here instead of on the quook sites, because there used to be so many people who appreciated keeping it real. Alas.
If Oregon had hired DeBoer, for example, imagine the non stop dooging around here about hiring some nobody from the Mountain West. But since the shoe is on the other foot, the forecast completely changes. That's dooging. He's the same coach today he was a month ago, but depending on what color tie he's wearing everything changes. If Oregon hires Aranda(they won't) it will be "lulz, he won 2 games in 2020", but if UW had hired him it would have been a grand slam.
And yes, the doog is as strong here today as it ever was or is on dawgman or bdtw. See: Broadcastingdoog, bill, haie, btp, huskyjw, insincere, greenriver, etc, etc, etc. People who derive their own egos from the rivalry and are unable to accept certain realities without their world crashing down.
It bums me out, because I DO care and have zero shame admitting it. This place used to be where doogs came to get eviscerated, where the shit wasn't tolerated, yet now dooging is mainstream even here. It's why I poast here instead of on the quook sites, because there used to be so many people who appreciated keeping it real. Alas.
Last edited:
creepycoug
Well-known poster
tl;dr
creepycoug
Well-known poster
Of course the derivative is coog, and the first meaning was, as said, being more concerned with another (better) program losing than they are about their program winning. This thought process is rooted in the fact that their program is so fucking hopeless that they know winning is unrealistic, they resort to all they have: enjoying the other program doing badly.
As time went on, it made its way west and became a description of a pollyanna DWAG fan, who is not only naively and excessively optimistic, but is so fucking biased that they can't see past their purple nose. Washington is great all the time, and when they're not they still are.
Then it morphed again to describe the DWAG who applies that same bias, but focuses it against against Cuog! and, more often, Oregon. This is the fan who would say Joe Montana is overrated if he played for the Ducks. This is the guy who truly delights in hearing that Marcus Mariota really wanted to be a Dawg!
They're all related. The term does get used too liberally.
As time went on, it made its way west and became a description of a pollyanna DWAG fan, who is not only naively and excessively optimistic, but is so fucking biased that they can't see past their purple nose. Washington is great all the time, and when they're not they still are.
Then it morphed again to describe the DWAG who applies that same bias, but focuses it against against Cuog! and, more often, Oregon. This is the fan who would say Joe Montana is overrated if he played for the Ducks. This is the guy who truly delights in hearing that Marcus Mariota really wanted to be a Dawg!
They're all related. The term does get used too liberally.
Last edited:
Doog thread