DM to the Biden Bros

Bob, I may be liberal but I aint stupid. Of course it will turn into some inflammatory indictment on libtards or China Joe. You want that battle and I'm not going to give you the pleasure. You guys don't debate in good faith whatsoever. All roads lead to flaming, insults, and left vs right warfare. It's pathetic.
 
Last edited:
“Peer-reviewed 50-year forecasts made on assumptive models with an insignificant sample size of the Earth’s history” isn’t real science, Retard.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
Bob, I may be liberal but I aint stupid. Of course it will turn into some inflammatory indictment on libtards or China Joe. You want that battle and I'm not going to give you the pleasure. You guys don't debate in good faith whatsoever. All roads lead to flaming, insults, and left vs right warfare. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
You won't even attempt to debate. And you are the one lobbing generic insults that have nothing to do with the topic.
 
I'm not sure what getting a bunch of hard right Putin lovers to agree with you on man made climate change does for you but we are willing to let the existence into the record so we can move on to what the fuck should we do about it
Do you agree with Inslee and Biden and all the mainstream democrats and their approach.
Inslee and Biden can't explain it. So maybe there is no explanation. Just go along with it and shut up.
The only honest answer is when they slip up and say they want to price people out of cars because that is electoral suicide.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
Bob, I may be liberal but I aint stupid. Of course it will turn into some inflammatory indictment on libtards or China Joe. You want that battle and I'm not going to give you the pleasure. You guys don't debate in good faith whatsoever. All roads lead to flaming, insults, and left vs right warfare. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
This whole thread is a demonstration of me willing to shift the goalposts in the left’s favor to engage in good faith debate.
Predictably, name calling, derailment, and accusations of racism follow.
 
EverettChris said:
“Peer-reviewed 50-year forecasts made on assumptive models with an insignificant sample size of the Earth’s history” isn’t real science, Retard.
Click to expand...
Take It to the climate thread. We are here to establish epistemological agreement so we can have a good faith debate.
 
I have no idea where the climate thread is. I thought it was here
Anyway there are no sources that will be revealed here
 
UW_Doog_Bot said:
CallMeBigErn said:
Bob, I may be liberal but I aint stupid. Of course it will turn into some inflammatory indictment on libtards or China Joe. You want that battle and I'm not going to give you the pleasure. You guys don't debate in good faith whatsoever. All roads lead to flaming, insults, and left vs right warfare. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
This whole thread is a demonstration of me willing to shift the goalposts in the left’s favor to engage in good faith debate.
Predictably, name calling, derailment, and accusations of racism follow.
Click to expand...

cnn-projection.gif
 
Last edited:
CallMeBigErn said:
UW_Doog_Bot said:
CallMeBigErn said:
Bob, I may be liberal but I aint stupid. Of course it will turn into some inflammatory indictment on libtards or China Joe. You want that battle and I'm not going to give you the pleasure. You guys don't debate in good faith whatsoever. All roads lead to flaming, insults, and left vs right warfare. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
This whole thread is a demonstration of me willing to shift the goalposts in the left’s favor to engage in good faith debate.
Predictably, name calling, derailment, and accusations of racism follow.
Click to expand...

cnn-projection.gif
Click to expand...
You can bump where I resorted to name calling and personal attacks in this thread.
I've also asked both right and left to not derail the thread.
Still waiting.
 
How about the University of East Anglia where Michael Mann made up his hockey stick with fake temperature data and then he and his university refused access to raw data and then the damning emails. The US has been altering historical temperature data decreasing historical high temperatures and increasing more modern temperatures. Toss in the urban heat island impact where most of the claimed warming is occurring at night as cement, black top and large building release heat stored during the day. The tell is our self-proclaimed scientist has offered no solution other than the failing solution of government fascism of mandated expensive dirty non-reliable renewable solar and wind while giving the chicoms a pass. Then all that hard science that was telling us that snowfall would be a thing of the past, no glaciers in the Alps, no ice caps, a flooded New York City all to have occurred a decade/decades ago.
 
UW_Doog_Bot said:
CallMeBigErn said:
How Trustworthy Are Scientific Assessments of Climate Change?
Click to expand...
Kinda funny,
"The views expressed in American Meteorological Society Policy Program memos are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Meteorological Society, its members, or sponsors."
Anyway, good, I'm glad, we have one source, finally, AMS. Any others?
Click to expand...
Just so you'll shut up.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C29&q=climate+change+impacts&oq=climate
 
CallMeBigErn said:
UW_Doog_Bot said:
CallMeBigErn said:
How Trustworthy Are Scientific Assessments of Climate Change?
Click to expand...
Kinda funny,
"The views expressed in American Meteorological Society Policy Program memos are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Meteorological Society, its members, or sponsors."
Anyway, good, I'm glad, we have one source, finally, AMS. Any others?
Click to expand...
Just so you'll shut up.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C29&q=climate+change+impacts&oq=climate
Click to expand...
Did you read the OP? This isn't a climate change thread but a thread to establish legitimate sources. I take it materials from Google scholar are considered legitimate as well then?
Good, I hope we can build on this list. Where else is acceptable for news and information?
 
CallMeBigErn said:
RaceBannon said:
You guys are consistently taking your eyes off the ball I'm tossing at you. I'm just here to get people to admit to the existence of a problem. That's it. That's clearly fucking hard enough, am I wrong?

Yes
Click to expand...
It sure hasn't been easy, I'll say that. I've only seen one person give a token nod at best to the existence of human caused climate change. That's a terrible ROI on my time so far.
Click to expand...
I posted a video of an actual scientist - with more scientific brain power in his pinky toe than you could wish for - explain how the real science was manipulated (out-right fabrication) for political gain. That man is not lying. And all you could focus on is the platform it came from, no substance. I've watched the same scientist explain the substance of the real graph using extensive ice sheet core sampling. Real, actual science.
You claim pseudoscience with no source, not alternate evidence, nothing. At this point calling someone a pseudoscientist is as worthless as calling someone a racist or white supremacist. It means nothing anymore due to overuse. By you, the HARD Left.

.

Moreover, the disagreements I can remember with my conservative/maga brethren.
@UW_Doog_Bot China, Peter Zeihan
@creepycoug Abortion, Israel/Palestine
@WestlinnDuck Israel/Palestine
@RaceBannon Israel/Palestine
@PostGameOrangeSlices Ukraine
@DerekJohnson Video Sources

Contrary to popular HARD left opinion, conversation and real debate happen around here.

.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I forgot that you asked us for where we get all our information out of the blue. That was weird.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top