Dissecting idiotic national media narratives RE: Seahawks

[dhdawg]

"the broncos will just load the box to stop lynch and force wilson to beat them"
Didn't the niners load the box. Lynch still ran for 110. Lynch in the playoffs has been money, stopping him isn't just that simple.
"Sherman can't cover 4 recievers"
Everyone think maxwell and thurmond aren't good only because they don't get hype and haven't been starters very long. So people just ignore their stats and what they do for the team.
"seahawks can't hide behind their home crowd"
people are still spewing this shit out. News flash, no team is as good on the road as they are at home. The seahawks have the exact same road record as denver.
"Wilson is just a game manager, look at his passing yardage"
This is a classic argument that holds no water. While wilson has not been playing great although he pretty good against SF, using passing yardage as a reason a run first, prevent turnovers at all costs offense sucks is FS.
"the seahawks offense sucks"
People look at statistics, like yardage and points, and when a team isn't at the top the offense sucks. PFO has them in the top 10 in DVOA. These days it's all about fantasy points and no one can accept a team that plays ball control
I've seen a couple people say the Broncos win in a blowout. Just like every team other team has done to the seahawks the last 2 years. They haven't lost by more than 7 points since CIN in the middle of fucking 2011

 

[jecornel]

The national media once again proves how out of touch and anept they are.... Also cowherd was a complete moron on Brock n Danny the week before the niners game....he completely missed the boat on the hawks.
I'm hoping for a massive blowout.

 

[unfrozencaveman]

FYI -

Manning's career record is 4-7 when the temperature is 32 or colder at kickoff. This could be the coldest Superbowl in history. Current record is the 39 @ kickoff Super Bowl VI in 1972 in New Orleans’ Tulane Stadium

Weather favors Seattle - Manning is cold sensitive

I don't see blowout, but a 27-23 or 28-24 type game. Take the Hawks and make some free cash

 

[Passion]

I'm not predicting a winner, but there have been plenty of average quarterbacks that have won the Super Bowl (Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler) and plenty of great quarterbacks that have lost the Super Bowl (John Elway, Dan Marino, Tom Brady, Fran Tarkenton, Jim Kelly). So, while I think Peyton is great, it doesn't mean denver will win.

However, no average defense has ever won a Super Bowl. Some defenses have been better than others, but ALL Super Bowl winners have had VERY good defenses. It's a requirement.

 

[dhdawg]

FYI -

Manning's career record is 4-7 when the temperature is 32 or colder at kickoff. This could be the coldest Superbowl in history. Current record is the 39 @ kickoff Super Bowl VI in 1972 in New Orleans’ Tulane Stadium

Weather favors Seattle - Manning is cold sensitive

I don't see blowout, but a 27-23 or 28-24 type game. Take the Hawks and make some free cash

I think the hawks win by a little more than that. They take the lead in the 4th 21-20 and then add another TD as they wear denver down.
I'm looking at 28-20.
I also wouldn't be shocked at all if we lose, but we're not getting blown out. Speaking of which check out this thread from the donkey forumhttp://forums.denverbroncos.com/sho...Bowl-XLVIII-Predictions&p=4917739#post4917739
HINT: The predictions are 80% bronco blowout

 

[PurpleBaze]

HINT: The predictions are 80% bronco blowout

Somebody needs to post 5 reasons over there. I see some 35-17 type scores over there. The tables need to be turned on them a bit.

I like how they are underestimating the Seahawks' defense.

 

[dhdawg]

HINT: The predictions are 80% bronco blowout

Somebody needs to post 5 reasons over there. I see some 35-17 type scores over there. The tables need to be turned on them a bit.

I like how they are underestimating the Seahawks' defense.

someone definitely needs to post a 5 reasons.
Look harder, there's a few 45-17 type scores, the worst is the 13-6, they're gonna hold us to 6?
But yes someone needs to poast a 5 reasons for sure

 

[CuntWaffle]

These Brooncoo fans seriously all might have down syndrome. They can't surpass 30 on the Charters and Pats but they are going to break 40 and even 50 on Seattle? Christ! Someone give them a heavy dose of citrus. Hopefully they decide to kill themselves as well.

 

[HeretoBeatmyChest]

I'm not predicting a winner, but there have been plenty of average quarterbacks that have won the Super Bowl (Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler) and plenty of great quarterbacks that have lost the Super Bowl (John Elway, Dan Marino, Tom Brady, Fran Tarkenton, Jim Kelly). So, while I think Peyton is great, it doesn't mean denver will win.

However, no average defense has ever won a Super Bowl. Some defenses have been better than others, but ALL Super Bowl winners have had VERY good defenses. It's a requirement.

Normally I agree w/ you Passion but Baltimore last year didn't have a great D. Nor did New Orleans the year they won. Nor did Green Bay.

 

[dnc]

I'm not predicting a winner, but there have been plenty of average quarterbacks that have won the Super Bowl (Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler) and plenty of great quarterbacks that have lost the Super Bowl (John Elway, Dan Marino, Tom Brady, Fran Tarkenton, Jim Kelly). So, while I think Peyton is great, it doesn't mean denver will win.

However, no average defense has ever won a Super Bowl. Some defenses have been better than others, but ALL Super Bowl winners have had VERY good defenses. It's a requirement.

That stopped being true around 2007

 

[dhdawg]

I'm not predicting a winner, but there have been plenty of average quarterbacks that have won the Super Bowl (Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler) and plenty of great quarterbacks that have lost the Super Bowl (John Elway, Dan Marino, Tom Brady, Fran Tarkenton, Jim Kelly). So, while I think Peyton is great, it doesn't mean denver will win.

However, no average defense has ever won a Super Bowl. Some defenses have been better than others, but ALL Super Bowl winners have had VERY good defenses. It's a requirement.

Normally I agree w/ you Passion but Baltimore last year didn't have a great D. Nor did New Orleans the year they won. Nor did Green Bay.

Disagree, in the playoffs GB's defense came on hard, remember they contained vick in philly. got the backbreaker pick six on Ryan and held chi scoreless after 3 quarters.
Balt held luck in the div to 9, held NE in Foxborough to 13, and played pretty well against DEN (denver got 2 TD on ST)
NO yes I'll give u that one

 

[dhdawg]

Our offense plays well in certain games, and plays badly in others.
Every team they've played badly against has something in common. Speed off the edge and at MLB.
SF with Smith, and Brooks
HOU with Cushing, Mercilus and Reed
Ari with Dansby and Washington
STL with Quinn and Long
CAR with Hardy, Keuchly, Johnson, and Beason.
Also teams who have faced Wilson before, and know how to contain him.
Denver played against him in preseason, but does that count?
it's not a coincidence teams who have faced wilson on multiple occasions and have speed off the edges and at LB fare well against us, cause they do a better job at keeping RW inside the pocket.
they will finally have to open up the offense and wilson is probably dying to prove his doubters wrong

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

Our offense plays well in certain games, and plays badly in others.
Every team they've played badly against has something in common. Speed off the edge and at MLB.
SF with Smith, and Brooks
HOU with Cushing, Mercilus and Reed
Ari with Dansby and Washington
STL with Quinn and Long
CAR with Hardy, Keuchly, Johnson, and Beason.
Also teams who have faced Wilson before, and know how to contain him.
Denver played against him in preseason, but does that count?
it's not a coincidence teams who have faced wilson on multiple occasions and have speed off the edges and at LB fare well against us, cause they do a better job at keeping RW inside the pocket.
they will finally have to open up the offense and wilson is probably dying to prove his doubters wrong

This is where his race lack of height hurts him.

Sincerely,
Hugh Millen

 

[MikeDamone]

Mods...can you move this shit to a "Dooging it up" forum. SeaHook threads can go there too.

You all need to take a look in the mirror and light yourselves on fire while fucking you, fucking me and fucking everyone.

 

[dhdawg]

Our offense plays well in certain games, and plays badly in others.
Every team they've played badly against has something in common. Speed off the edge and at MLB.
SF with Smith, and Brooks
HOU with Cushing, Mercilus and Reed
Ari with Dansby and Washington
STL with Quinn and Long
CAR with Hardy, Keuchly, Johnson, and Beason.
Also teams who have faced Wilson before, and know how to contain him.
Denver played against him in preseason, but does that count?
it's not a coincidence teams who have faced wilson on multiple occasions and have speed off the edges and at LB fare well against us, cause they do a better job at keeping RW inside the pocket.
they will finally have to open up the offense and wilson is probably dying to prove his doubters wrong

This is where his race lack of height hurts him.

Sincerely,
Hugh Millen

It does, that's definitely somewhere.he has got to improve

 

[MikeDamone]

These Brooncoo fans seriously all might have down syndrome. They can't surpass 30 on the Charters and Pats but they are going to break 40 and even 50 on Seattle? Christ! Someone give them a heavy dose of citrus. Hopefully they decide to kill themselves as well.

Lol. Yeah...the Brooncoo fans have Down's syndrome!!!!!!ROFL!!! Thy HD citrus!! Lol!

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

Mods...can you move this shit to a "Dooging it up" forum. SeaHook threads can go there too.

You all need to take a look in the mirror and light yourselves on fire while fucking you, fucking me and fucking everyone.

Stale.

 

[MikeDamone]

Mods...can you move this shit to a "Dooging it up" forum. SeaHook threads can go there too.

You all need to take a look in the mirror and light yourselves on fire while fucking you, fucking me and fucking everyone.

Stale.

We have failed you. We tried, but clearly didn't get though. I take a lot of the blame. I'll learn and move on and hopefully do better with the next doogman refugee.

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

Mods...can you move this shit to a "Dooging it up" forum. SeaHook threads can go there too.

You all need to take a look in the mirror and light yourselves on fire while fucking you, fucking me and fucking everyone.

Stale.

We have failed you. We tried, but clearly didn't get though. I take a lot of the blame. I'll learn and move on and hopefully do better with the next doogman refugee.

Do you have anything better to do than bitch about the Seahawks on a Seattle football team's message board? I'm thinking no.

It's fucking Super Bowl week. To quote PL_SS, "pop a molly and dance on the streets like desmond howie"

 

[MikeDamone]

Mods...can you move this shit to a "Dooging it up" forum. SeaHook threads can go there too.

You all need to take a look in the mirror and light yourselves on fire while fucking you, fucking me and fucking everyone.

Stale.

We have failed you. We tried, but clearly didn't get though. I take a lot of the blame. I'll learn and move on and hopefully do better with the next doogman refugee.

Do you have anything better to do than bitch about the Seahawks on a Seattle football team's message board? I'm thinking no.

It's fucking Super Bowl week. To quote PL_SS, "pop a molly and dance on the streets like desmond howie"

1. I'm not bitching about the Seahawks
2. It's not a "Seattle football teams message board". It's a UW board.
3. You're a SeaHook and it's funny.

Goooooo Seakhawks!!!! Beat the Doncos!!! And fuck their Down's syndrome fans!!!!!1!

Oh..

4. No, I don't have anything better to do. Mocking you is my top priority.