People expressing themselves socially:
Insurrectionists!:
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck all those guys.
I'd agree if we phucked "all those guys". But we are not phucking your guys. Your side encouraged them, bailed them out, dropped charges and allowed our cities to be destroyed. Congrats on your "impartiality." In this case, I think you are so stupid that you thought you said something important. Sort of like some of your other memorable comments - like ''Hands up don't shoot" and "More fiscally viable alternative".
Only stupid people think there are just two points of view.
Thank you for illustrating that once again, Gasbag.
Sometimes there are. But nothing I wrote was remotely a lie. Your side encouraged the summer of love and actively fought anyone who wanted to stop the riots. Which FBI agents were involved in encouraging the burning of Minneapolis and made George Floyd a hero? I'd have no problem with arresting and giving misdemeanors for "trespassing" in the national capital. Just like I oppose shooting non-violent rioters in Portland. You throw bricks and molotov cocktails to burn down a police precinct and trying to kill cops then I'm good with the cops defending themselves. Demanding equal justice doesn't have two points of view. You either do or do not.
My side is wealthy people who do most of the paying, don't like property destruction and favor the rule of law. No one who defends or minimizes the actions of the January 6 mob favors the rule of law.
People expressing themselves socially:
Insurrectionists!:
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck all those guys.
I'd agree if we phucked "all those guys". But we are not phucking your guys. Your side encouraged them, bailed them out, dropped charges and allowed our cities to be destroyed. Congrats on your "impartiality." In this case, I think you are so stupid that you thought you said something important. Sort of like some of your other memorable comments - like ''Hands up don't shoot" and "More fiscally viable alternative".
Only stupid people think there are just two points of view.
Thank you for illustrating that once again, Gasbag.
Sometimes there are. But nothing I wrote was remotely a lie. Your side encouraged the summer of love and actively fought anyone who wanted to stop the riots. Which FBI agents were involved in encouraging the burning of Minneapolis and made George Floyd a hero? I'd have no problem with arresting and giving misdemeanors for "trespassing" in the national capital. Just like I oppose shooting non-violent rioters in Portland. You throw bricks and molotov cocktails to burn down a police precinct and trying to kill cops then I'm good with the cops defending themselves. Demanding equal justice doesn't have two points of view. You either do or do not.
My side is wealthy people who do most of the paying, don't like property destruction and favor the rule of law. No one who defends or minimizes the actions of the January 6 mob favors the rule of law.
This may be the worst post ever on this site
People expressing themselves socially:
Insurrectionists!:
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck all those guys.
I'd agree if we phucked "all those guys". But we are not phucking your guys. Your side encouraged them, bailed them out, dropped charges and allowed our cities to be destroyed. Congrats on your "impartiality." In this case, I think you are so stupid that you thought you said something important. Sort of like some of your other memorable comments - like ''Hands up don't shoot" and "More fiscally viable alternative".
Only stupid people think there are just two points of view.
Thank you for illustrating that once again, Gasbag.
Sometimes there are. But nothing I wrote was remotely a lie. Your side encouraged the summer of love and actively fought anyone who wanted to stop the riots. Which FBI agents were involved in encouraging the burning of Minneapolis and made George Floyd a hero? I'd have no problem with arresting and giving misdemeanors for "trespassing" in the national capital. Just like I oppose shooting non-violent rioters in Portland. You throw bricks and molotov cocktails to burn down a police precinct and trying to kill cops then I'm good with the cops defending themselves. Demanding equal justice doesn't have two points of view. You either do or do not.
My side is wealthy people who do most of the paying, don't like property destruction and favor the rule of law. No one who defends or minimizes the actions of the January 6 mob favors the rule of law.
This may be the worst post ever on this site
That is a high-bar, quite honestly. Kudos.
People expressing themselves socially:
Insurrectionists!:
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck all those guys.
I'd agree if we phucked "all those guys". But we are not phucking your guys. Your side encouraged them, bailed them out, dropped charges and allowed our cities to be destroyed. Congrats on your "impartiality." In this case, I think you are so stupid that you thought you said something important. Sort of like some of your other memorable comments - like ''Hands up don't shoot" and "More fiscally viable alternative".
Only stupid people think there are just two points of view.
Thank you for illustrating that once again, Gasbag.
Sometimes there are. But nothing I wrote was remotely a lie. Your side encouraged the summer of love and actively fought anyone who wanted to stop the riots. Which FBI agents were involved in encouraging the burning of Minneapolis and made George Floyd a hero? I'd have no problem with arresting and giving misdemeanors for "trespassing" in the national capital. Just like I oppose shooting non-violent rioters in Portland. You throw bricks and molotov cocktails to burn down a police precinct and trying to kill cops then I'm good with the cops defending themselves. Demanding equal justice doesn't have two points of view. You either do or do not.
My side is wealthy people who do most of the paying, don't like property destruction and favor the rule of law. No one who defends or minimizes the actions of the January 6 mob favors the rule of law.
People expressing themselves socially:
Insurrectionists!:
Ann Davison voter here.
Fuck all those guys.
I'd agree if we phucked "all those guys". But we are not phucking your guys. Your side encouraged them, bailed them out, dropped charges and allowed our cities to be destroyed. Congrats on your "impartiality." In this case, I think you are so stupid that you thought you said something important. Sort of like some of your other memorable comments - like ''Hands up don't shoot" and "More fiscally viable alternative".
Only stupid people think there are just two points of view.
Thank you for illustrating that once again, Gasbag.
Sometimes there are. But nothing I wrote was remotely a lie. Your side encouraged the summer of love and actively fought anyone who wanted to stop the riots. Which FBI agents were involved in encouraging the burning of Minneapolis and made George Floyd a hero? I'd have no problem with arresting and giving misdemeanors for "trespassing" in the national capital. Just like I oppose shooting non-violent rioters in Portland. You throw bricks and molotov cocktails to burn down a police precinct and trying to kill cops then I'm good with the cops defending themselves. Demanding equal justice doesn't have two points of view. You either do or do not.
My side is wealthy people who do most of the paying, don't like property destruction and favor the rule of law. No one who defends or minimizes the actions of the January 6 mob favors the rule of law.
