Disagree with Jerry Brewer on one point.

If you've never sucked Oregon's balls you're really in no position to criticize

#brents
 
Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.
Click to expand...

Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.
Click to expand...

Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
Click to expand...

I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

I do that.
Click to expand...

I'd like to be a blowhard tough guy on the web that offers nothing like man boobs, but I have a fully functional brain. And at least I don't suck oregon's balls.

Regarding Softy and Brewer offering no worthwhile information (if that is your question), I mostly agree with you. Regardless, I read everything related to Husky Football, and then sift through the mountain of bullshit in order to get the occasional nugget of worthwhile information. For example, a couple of weeks ago I linked a Brewer story where he said that 7-6 is no longer acceptable and Sark's seat is getting warm. It's the closest thing I've heard to a "tough" statement, and it got a negative reaction from the pollyanas on doucheman.com (of course).

I also posted Colin Cowherd's quotes about how UW is lacking on the D-line. First time I've heard that in the mainstream media.
Click to expand...

So you agree that Brewer offers nothing worthwhile other than the weakest of threats about Sark's job security, yet you continue to read him.

El. Oh. El.
 
Reading Brewer is every bit as fucktarded as listening to Softy.
Click to expand...

Yah, heaven forbid you get info from multiple sources and then form your own opinion. Better to just limit your contribution to this board to one-line zingers.
Click to expand...

Since when have Brewer and Softy provided any actual information about anything?
Click to expand...

I like to be a passive aggressive pussy like Passion and vote down a post that proves me wrong, rather than actually answer the fucking question.

I do that.
Click to expand...

I'd like to be a blowhard tough guy on the web that offers nothing like man boobs, but I have a fully functional brain. And at least I don't suck oregon's balls.

Regarding Softy and Brewer offering no worthwhile information (if that is your question), I mostly agree with you. Regardless, I read everything related to Husky Football, and then sift through the mountain of bullshit in order to get the occasional nugget of worthwhile information. For example, a couple of weeks ago I linked a Brewer story where he said that 7-6 is no longer acceptable and Sark's seat is getting warm. It's the closest thing I've heard to a "tough" statement, and it got a negative reaction from the pollyanas on doucheman.com (of course).

I also posted Colin Cowherd's quotes about how UW is lacking on the D-line. First time I've heard that in the mainstream media.
Click to expand...

So you agree that Brewer offers nothing worthwhile other than the weakest of threats about Sark's job security, yet you continue to read him.

El. Oh. El.
Click to expand...

I love when Doogs argue with you disagreeing with something then at the end of the argument they end up agreeing with you without even realizing it.
 
I don't get how this has all been solved by one game. Wasn't anything learned by the two USC wins where the same shit was being said? If there is one characteristic that I think defines a doog, that's the inability to learn from the past.

LIPO
Click to expand...

Those two wins against USC didn't count. Didn't you know that? Last year was really Sark's first year.
 
You guys need at quick intervention at Western State Mental Hospital. They have program to stop the ball sucking urge! Even though there is no cure.
 
Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.
Click to expand...

Obviously, we need to see more than just one game to make conclusions about the Huskies' potential in 2013, much less the job UW's coaching staff is doing thus far. Still, the near domination of BSU was refreshing for a first game of the season in some important ways that I don't believe we had seen before from a Sarkisian coached team. I'm anxious to see if good aggressive defense and focused near error free fundamentals in all phases will again show up in game #2, this time on the road where Sark as well as most collegiate football coaches struggle to get wins. I would not expect a Seattle Times commentator could ever share my interest or anxiety.
Click to expand...

Tailgater is here? Dawgman's biggest ball gargler? WTF?
 
You guys need at quick intervention at Western State Mental Hospital. They have program to stop the ball sucking urge! Even though there is no cure.
Click to expand...

Pressing. Or possible drunk posting.
 
reading newspapers is actually really important because the writers study events that they cover... just kidding... they're f'tards who spend 4 years learning how to write headlines that suck enough readers in so that the advertisers are cool with it... reading the paper is pretty pointless nowadays.
 
It is unusual for anyone in the mainstream media to comment on deficiencies in the D-line. Comments on anything occurring near the line of scrimmage are typically banished from forums focused on serious football news....... due to lack of interest in the mundane.
 
Jerry brewer is the Ruth of the Seattle times. He plays himself up as the stereotypical black point of view every time on kjr. In the Seattle times he does cool things like compare coaches to kanye west Really though he is just a huge dork.
Dude acts like he knows a lot about college football and Elise has to put him in his place. That alone says enough
 
Jerry brewer is the Ruth of the Seattle times. He plays himself up as the stereotypical black point of view every time on kjr. In the Seattle times he does cool things like compare coaches to kanye west Really though he is just a huge dork.
Dude acts like he knows a lot about college football and Elise has to put him in his place. That alone says enough
Click to expand...
Molly Yannity was the Roof of the Seattle PI (rip).

#NeverForget
 
Jerry brewer is the Ruth of the Seattle times. He plays himself up as the stereotypical black point of view every time on kjr. In the Seattle times he does cool things like compare coaches to kanye west Really though he is just a huge dork.
Dude acts like he knows a lot about college football and Elise has to put him in his place. That alone says enough
Click to expand...
Molly Yannity was the Roof of the Seattle PI (rip).

#NeverForget
Click to expand...

BRB, JO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top