Did it hit the ground official thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Deleted User]
  • Start date Start date
Boobs, its you and me against the world convincing people to see reality.
Click to expand...

Yep.

@A_Jude 5m
UW AD Scott Woodward told me he's already been in contact with the Pac-12 office tonight about the replay. Not unusual for ADs to do that.
 
But the call took way too fucking long. Which means by definition the evidence was not indisputable and the call should not have been overturned.

It is like they talked themselves into the call.
 
But the call took way too fucking long. Which means by definition the evidence was not indisputable and the call should not have been overturned.

It is like they talked themselves into the call.
Click to expand...

I agree. I think it was incomplete and it was somewhat evident, but to call the angles we got conclusive is bullshit. The refs didn't want Stanford to get fucked over by an iffy call. That said, no excuse for the KR for TD by Montgomery and the pooch kick at the end of the 2nd. If doogs want to blame the refs, they need to look at their own fuck ups first. We had ample opportunity to win this game.

 
But the call took way too fucking long. Which means by definition the evidence was not indisputable and the call should not have been overturned.

It is like they talked themselves into the call.
Click to expand...

It takes longer when you have to reverse, because you have to figure out where to move the ball and what the clock should be.

"Taking too long" doesn't mean anything. Knowing the Pac-12 and ESPN, it might have taken them three minutes to load the video to be frame-by-frame and shit.
 
I am inebriated beyond the telling of it. This loss hurts. I hope no one blames any shred of this game on Keith. The guy is such a fucking warrior and did everything to bring him back. He is top 5 all time UW QB and anyone who says otherwise is fucking stupid.
 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
Click to expand...

Those of us who aren't poor terrorists can frame by frame this on our DVRs.

From the side angle, the ball is between his two arms. From the angle behind Smith, the ball is clearly on the ground.

It's an incomplete pass.

Hope this helps.

 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
Click to expand...
Agreed, the right hand could very well be under the ball.

 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
Click to expand...
Agreed, the right hand could very well be under the ball.
Click to expand...

The right hand is clearly not under the ball:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
 
Where is his right hand though Boobie. It probably is incomplete, but CONCLUSIVE.... I haven't seen it yet. Don't forget, they called a complete pass.
 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
Click to expand...
Agreed, the right hand could very well be under the ball.
Click to expand...

The right hand is clearly not under the ball:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
Click to expand...
disagree. You can't see the front half of the ball. It's not likely, but it's certainly possible there's a hand under there.
 
Where is his right hand though Boobie. It probably is incomplete, but CONCLUSIVE.... I haven't seen it yet. Don't forget, they called a complete pass.
Click to expand...

Protip: His right hand IS NOT under the ball. If it was, you wouldn't see the clear curvature of the football in that picture.

If you don't think this evidence is conclusive, you probably served on the OJ jury.

Maybe this evidence will convince you:

autopsy.post.mortem.michael.baden.H264.AAC.AC310.jpg


nicole-brown-simpson-and-ronald-goldman-crime-scene-photos-01.jpg
 
Boobie, I appreciate the humor, but we have different interpretations of conclusive evidence.
 
Boobie, I appreciate the humor, but we have different interpretations of conclusive evidence.
Click to expand...

Silly me. I think conclusive evidence of a ball on the ground is conclusive evidence of an incomplete pass.
Click to expand...
I like that you answer to Boobie

 
Ball hit the ground

Should we consider this another Kevin smith drop? Thought he had a pretty good chance at making the catch
 
It's hilarious to me that any of you drones is even attempting to claim that this blurry bullshit even begins to prove anything. Tell me, where is his right hand? Where is this ball relative to the ground? You don't have any of the screenshots you need.
Click to expand...
Agreed, the right hand could very well be under the ball.
Click to expand...

The right hand is clearly not under the ball:

BV36CAVCYAAJeSM.jpg:large
Click to expand...
disagree. You can't see the front half of the ball. It's not likely, but it's certainly possible there's a hand under there.
Click to expand...

That doesn't matter. If you're using the ground to help you make the catch, it's an incomplete pass. If ANY part of the ball hits the ground in this scenario, it's an incomplete pass.

Ref Superiority Guy.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top