Dazzler is this another issue you don't support but vote for anyway?

[Sledog]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!

 

[HHusky]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

 

[46XiJCAB]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

Gosnell says hold my beer. I'm sure he was/is the lone wolf.

Dazzler, fuck off.

 

[HHusky]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.

What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.

You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.

 

[MikeDamone]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

What are the penalties for a doctor not acting in good faith and who decides if the doctor acted in good faith?

This bill allows for abortion up to birth for any reason and you trying to suggest it doesn't by hiding behind non specific and flimsy language is embarrassing, even for you, lady.

 

[MikeDamone]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.

What did I omit? I posted the exact language of the bill, sally.

You said the tweet wasn't inaccurate. It was grossly inaccurate, by omission, the technique of all studied liars.

It's very accurate. Your typical mental convulsions don't change that, Mary.

 

[HHusky]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!

You don't give a shit about children.

It's fetuses you fetishize.

 

[Sledog]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!

You don't give a shit about children.

It's fetuses you fetishize.

My children would say otherwise.

 

[MikeDamone]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

Gosnell says hold my beer, I'm a doc not a politician.

Dazzler, fuck off.

PDX wants to ban abortion to stop doctors from committing felonies.

That's TugCon logic.

No we wnat them to stop murdering children you feckless cunt!

You don't give a shit about children.

It's fetuses you fetishize.

There's the white flag. Sooner than usual.

Trite talking point.

 

[RaceBannon]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

So you lied and Damone is right

Got it

 

[RaceBannon]

Now that we've clarified that the democrats want to kill viable babies up to birth time to make the commercials

 

[RaceBannon]

And your no @PurpleJ

 

[SFGbob]

"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.

 

[SFGbob]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

Gosnell says hold my beer.

Fuck off

He's in prison. If your doctor has his moral compass, get a new doctor.

He is in prison in part because he violated Pennsylvania state abortion laws. This bill would eliminate all of this laws. Do you enjoy being a lying piece of shit Dazzler?

 

[SFGbob]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

Remember when you stated this lie years ago and I posted the information that showed you were a fucking liar Dazzler? They aren’t common but they do happen liar and the only “tragic” thing is that you and your party support it.

 

[HHusky]

"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.

Can't trust pregnant persons or doctors of course. Those 9th month abortions for no reason at all are a real big worry for a bunch of sad old fuckers like yourselves. Happens all the time!

 

[46XiJCAB]

"49 Democrat senators just voted that it should be lawful to kill it the moment before this while it was still inside its mother."

No they didn't. But I can understand why a liar would quote a liar.

Shocking, Dazzler goes with the lie. Nothing in that bill prevents a woman from aborting her kid in the 9th month for any reason she likes.

All she needs to find is a doctor who will say that for “mental” health reasons it’s okay.

Can't trust pregnant persons or doctors of course. Those 9th month abortions for no reason at all are a real big worry for a bunch of sad old fuckers like yourselves. Happens all the time!

Gosnell had no problem finding those poor minority women to abuse for cash. Late term.

Dazzler, fuck off.

 

[HHusky]

At least we established that the bill allows for abortion up to birth.

In a hypothetical extreme case. With a doctor having to make that judgment.

Late term abortions aren't really happening right at the moment before birth, and only in tragic cases. Not your stupid hypothetical.

Remember when you stated this lie years ago and I posted the information that showed you were a fucking liar Dazzler? They aren’t common but they do happen liar and the only “tragic” thing is that you and your party support it.

It's unrealistic to expect me to "remember" everything you imagine.

 

[SFGbob]

Yes, they did…

a) General Rule.--A health care provider has a statutory right
under this Act to provide abortion services, and may provide abortion
services, and that provider's patient has a corresponding right to
receive such services, without any of the following limitations or
requirements:

9) A prohibition on abortion after fetal viability when,
in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care
provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to
the pregnant patient's life or health.

Just make a “good-faith” medical judgment that the pregnant persons “health” is at risk.

Define good faith and health. Physical health? Mental health? Economic health?

“If don’t want a boy and if I have one my mental state will be irreparably harmed”

Right. 'Cuz we can't trust doctors. We need to leave medical decisions up to state legislators.

What was stated in the tweet is 100% accurate, ma'am.

That's the kind of "accuracy" we've grown to expect from you and blob.

Tell us how it's inaccurate, lady

It's your most frequent technique for lying. Lying by omission.

They only liar is the person claiming this bill wouldn't have allowed for late term abortions for any reason the mother came up with. If she wanted to abort her kid in the 8th month because the pain of having a toxic male was too much for her mental health and she found a doctor who agreed with her, nothing in this bill would have stopped her from doing so.

 

[46XiJCAB]

I remember when you lost your mind in the Woodshed 2.0 on this very topic. You were defending your GF Margaret, I was dragging your ass and you just cracked.

Good times.

For me.