Dave Wyman just said "not Hawks day" on postgame show

godawgst

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam

Gotta give him credit, he knows who signs his checks.

I'd love to ask him if everyone on both teams at full strength and healthy and they played 10 times, neutral field who wins?

He'd say 5 or 6 Hawks. Any objective observer would say 7 or 8 Rams.

These teams are not close in roster talent 1-52. Their OL and DL are jv versus varsity compared to Hawks.

Without Russell Wilson this team would win 3 or 4 games at best
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For a former player, Wyman brings nothing to the table. A lot of shitty vanilla insight and callbacks to how Pat Hill tuff he once was.

Shit, as bad as the UW media personalities are, the fucksticks that cover the hawks are 10x worse. Brock is probably the only one who is actually capable of breaking the game down to a schematic level, but his nose is still so far up Pete’s ass that you’ll never get an honest criticism from him.
 
For a former player, Wyman brings nothing to the table. A lot of shitty vanilla insight and callbacks to how Pat Hill tuff he once was.

Shit, as bad as the UW media personalities are, the fucksticks that cover the hawks are 10x worse. Brock is probably the only one who is actually capable of breaking the game down to a schematic level, but his nose is still so far up Pete’s ass that you’ll never get an honest criticism from him.

I'm a Brock fan and like him a lot. That being said, he and Salk act like they're afraid of Pete Carroll when they interview him every Monday.
 
I like Ray Roberts and Paul Moyer because they will usually tell it like they see it, good or bad.
 
I just can't stand Brock's tone and communication style. Way too self righteous and he takes 100 words to say what could be said in 20.

 
Last edited:
I just can't stand Brock's tone and communication style. Way too self righteous and he takes 100 words to say what could be said in 20.

So, Brock is a lot like Tequilla?
 
Back
Top