Dana Altman

I'll give Altman a W for the year. A Sweet 16 followed by a first round win is good for every Pac-12 program outside of Tucson.

It wasn't the NC run Quooks were predicting after beating up on bad teams early on but it's a successful season overall. If all of the potential recruits get in for next season the expectations should be to get to a round with a cool name.

I would take Altman over Romar, but I could see valid points for both on either side.
 
I'll give Altman a W for the year. A Sweet 16 followed by a first round win is good for every Pac-12 program outside of Tucson.

It wasn't the NC run Quooks were predicting after beating up on bad teams early on but it's a successful season overall. If all of the potential recruits get in for next season the expectations should be to get to a round with a cool name.

I would take Altman over Romar, but I could see valid points for both on either side.
Click to expand...

I would take Altman over Romar too. Romar had talent that very few Pac 12 teams have had since. There are very few Brandon Roy's, let alone teams with Brandon Roy, Nate Robinson, and 3-4 other All Conference players. Isaiah, Brockman, and Pondexter on the same team? No conference team has that kind of top 3 this year.

Romar had elite talent. The only argument one could make against that was he didn't have a great big man, but Brockman and MBA were both pretty good, especially Brockman. I think the vast majority of coaches could have achieved what Romar has.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top