Could Kamala win?

Question, since it's the subject of the thread and all, and being that this bored is a self-admitted far right circlejerk, I'm curious.
Is there any situation in the universe where, if Kamala does win the election, you'd legitimately believe she won? If not, then what's the point, in your perspective, in having an election? being that you won't accept the results if your guys loses. Not trying to be a dick, not that that matters here, but since it seems very few people on this bored think Trump actually lost last time, I'm posing the question.
I don't expect Kamala to win personally, but if she does, I fully expect Trump to scream that it was rigged like last time, since that's just what he does. So assuming he does, what's the endgame here?
And before you start your "but the left complained about Hillary when she lost," I already know, fuck off. Let's get that out of the way. Hillary sucked. She lost because she's the most unlikeable female politician who ever lived. Trump didn't need Russia to beat her. So we can cut the both sides BS and just talk about the present. Because the vibe I get on this bored is that there is no situation of Kamala winning that this bored will accept as legit. Prove me wrong.
 
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
 
thechatch said:
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
Click to expand...
So what's a clean election, in your eyes? What constitutes it? You already know as soon as the voting starts that both sides are going to be screaming foul without evidence, and people will believe it based on the candidate they want to win. So what situation in this election can it be "clean", in your eyes?
 
DucksFC said:
thechatch said:
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
Click to expand...
So what's a clean election, in your eyes? What constitutes it? You already know as soon as the voting starts that both sides are going to be screaming foul without evidence, and people will believe it based on the candidate they want to win. So what situation in this election can it be "clean", in your eyes?
Click to expand...
less than 1% variance due to fraud is a clean election in this day and age.

also,
https://twitter.com/madrid_mike/status/1817275146887213504?s=46&t=BrPpxiJ6HKnfDhc1-qw4vg
 
Sledog said:
Good Lord another commie.
Click to expand...
Yeah everyone you disagree with is a commie, I already know. I think this bored could do with people who keep you guysm from sucking each other off nonstop. Keeps things interesting.
 
Last edited:
thechatch said:
DucksFC said:
thechatch said:
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
Click to expand...
So what's a clean election, in your eyes? What constitutes it? You already know as soon as the voting starts that both sides are going to be screaming foul without evidence, and people will believe it based on the candidate they want to win. So what situation in this election can it be "clean", in your eyes?
Click to expand...
less than 1% variance due to fraud is a clean election in this day and age.

also,
https://twitter.com/madrid_mike/status/1817275146887213504?s=46&t=BrPpxiJ6HKnfDhc1-qw4vg
Click to expand...
So, every election.
Furthermore, the miniscule evidence of voter fraud in the previous two elections has been found to have benefited Trump overall. Hilarious considering the MAGA narrative, but true nonetheless.
Next.
 
Last edited:
DucksFC said:
thechatch said:
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
Click to expand...
So what's a clean election, in your eyes? What constitutes it? You already know as soon as the voting starts that both sides are going to be screaming foul without evidence, and people will believe it based on the candidate they want to win. So what situation in this election can it be "clean", in your eyes?
Click to expand...
No mysterious 100k all for Harris ballots showing up out of nowhere.... stuff like that
 
CallMeBigErn said:
thechatch said:
DucksFC said:
thechatch said:
I give Kamala about a 5% chance of winning a clean election.

She will have the full thrust of the MSM, intelligence apparatus, and the administrative state pushing her up and it’s still only about 5%

That’s how bad she is.
Click to expand...
So what's a clean election, in your eyes? What constitutes it? You already know as soon as the voting starts that both sides are going to be screaming foul without evidence, and people will believe it based on the candidate they want to win. So what situation in this election can it be "clean", in your eyes?
Click to expand...
less than 1% variance due to fraud is a clean election in this day and age.

also,
https://twitter.com/madrid_mike/status/1817275146887213504?s=46&t=BrPpxiJ6HKnfDhc1-qw4vg
Click to expand...
So, every election.
Furthermore, the miniscule evidence of voter fraud in the previous two elections has been found to have benefited Trump overall. Hilarious considering the MAGA narrative, but true nonetheless.
Next.
Click to expand...
lol this is patently untrue

Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and AZ were total disasters in 2020.
 
sydney-powell.png
 
DucksFC said:
Sledog said:
DucksFC said:
Sledog said:
Good Lord another commie.
Click to expand...
Yeah everyone you disagree with is a commie, I already know. I think this bored could do with people who keep you guysm from sucking each other off nonstop. Keeps things interesting.
Click to expand...
Read the room Duck.
Click to expand...
A big fucking echo chamber of conservative Doogs and a couple liberal Doogs you like to ridicule? I know.
Click to expand...
people disagree on shit all the time here.
 
But yeah, HH and Mello are consistently intellectually dishonest and Buck is a child.
I don’t agree with PGOS or Ern on a variety of subjects but at least they’re mostly honest and consistent with their positions
 
DucksFC said:
Sledog said:
DucksFC said:
Sledog said:
Good Lord another commie.
Click to expand...
Yeah everyone you disagree with is a commie, I already know. I think this bored could do with people who keep you guysm from sucking each other off nonstop. Keeps things interesting.
Click to expand...
Read the room Duck.
Click to expand...
A big fucking echo chamber of conservative Doogs and a couple liberal Doogs you like to ridicule? I know.
Click to expand...
It's not an echo chamber, we don't all agree on everything. But it's clear the democrats have their talking points down.
 
People that can't form am argument attack the forum
Water is wet
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top