Congratulations To Washington State: Nation's Top Economy

Overall No. 1 Washington was first in the economic activity category, 15th in economic health, and second in innovation potential.
“When it came to economic health, we looked at things like the unemployment rate, and the underemployment rate, and the change in the total civilian labor force to get a sense of how healthy the economy is right now,” Happe said.
So, in actual economic health, Washington is 15th. Rest is BS. Energy bad, high tech good. That's all buck and the morons that think Washington is number 1 need.
 
Guys, I didn't write that article. I'm just pleased that the facts are out. I know i've prospered in Washington State so I know these solid facts have backed up what ive been saying.
 
Last edited:
HuskyBuck said:
Guys, I didn't write that article. I'm just pleased that the facts are out. I know i've prospered in Washington State so I know these solid facts have backed up what ive been saying.
Click to expand...
Faux News is your source?

.
 
HuskyBuck said:
Guys, I didn't write that article. I'm just pleased that the facts are out. I know i've prospered in Washington State so I know these solid facts have backed up what ive been saying.
Click to expand...
Congrats on No. 15. You didn't write it or understand it. Like I said, "High tech good, energy bad". Good enough for leftards.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
HuskyBuck said:
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/1969934#Comment_1969934
There's no "L" Bob. Im just curious….can you at least answer the question I presented? I mean…you're not a moron (In contrast with EverettChris), how in God's name did you think there was 20 days involved anywhere on that chart that was incremented every 365 days?
Click to expand...
Jesus christ. Your bar chart showed 2008 with 30k troops, meaning that 2008 ended with 30k. You claimed that Obama started with 65k when he took office. So in order for both to be true, Bush would have had to add 35k while he was still in office in the first 20 days of 2009. Here's a line chart with more detail that shows you can't read a bar chart.

image.png
 
Its truly amazing how you guys literally took one metric, economic health, and took it out of context from the article-"Buck bro see look bro how wrong you are'! This is honestly the same bozo argument as anti climate change. You go outside in January and feel cold and come back in and say "See look!! EverettChris has shrinkage so of course climate change is fake cause its cold outside"!!!!

Its things like multiple data points to build an argument is what confuses you guys. Don't forget Buck-only one metric at at time!
 
Last edited:
SwoopTheMoon said:
Its truly amazing how you guys literally took one metric, economic health, and took it out of context from the article-"Buck bro see look bro how wrong you are'! This is honestly the same bozo argument as anti climate change. You go outside in January and feel cold and come back in and say "See look!! EverettChris has shrinkage so of course climate change is fake cause its cold outside"!!!!

Its things like multiple data points to build an argument is what confuses you guys. Don't forget Buck-only one metric at at time!
Click to expand...
”Climate change”

lol.
 
The economic health was the only metric dealing with economic health which had several metrics. When your metric includes high tech good and energy manufacturing is bad is just like a going outside in July and saying its hot as having something to do with economic strength. Other than that, you nailed it. Congrats on No. 15.
Reminds me of the UN study that rated the Cuban health system as superior to the US health system. A key metric was that the Cubans were not obese. Never mind they are on near starvation diets enforced by the commie economic policies. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
 
The metrics that matter are called voters
They ain't buying the bullshit Biden is selling
 
RaceBannon said:
And the Biden videos are fake
Click to expand...
Dont hate Race, just appreciate the greatness of Washington State.

And just by talking to people on this board, it would appear 100% of the posters on this board I've talked to are pulling in at least 1,000,000/yr salaries so it backs up Business Insiders' findings despite you being a hater!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top