CONFESSION IN KARI LAKE TRIAL? CASE CLOSED? TRIAL UPDATE!

[TurdBomber]

You’d have to be a complete moron to believe the intentional ballot reprogramming the day of the election to mis-size ballots only in heavily Republican districts was anything but blatant cheating.

The 3 Stooges above proving this point…

You get to assume facts at the Tug.

In court you’re required to prove them.

What would you know about court, Dazzler?

 

[Goduckies]

[/QUOTE]
The 3 Stooges above proving this point…

[/QUOTE]

I hate to agree with those jackasses ever, but i have yet to see evidence that there was enough provable fraud to overturn the election. That's the beauty of mail in voting for the dems, they can commit fraud and its impossible to prove... no phone movements don't count. You need to get rid of mail in voting period, but where you have it, do the same damn thing.

 

[HoustonHusky]

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

 

[HHusky]

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?

 

[MelloDawg]

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.

Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though.

 

[pawz]

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

Any of you gals ever going to actually read the decision you’re in such a tizzy about?

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

I have bad news for you: people wouldn’t have cared about this trial regardless of when it was held.

Imagine blowing such an open and shut case though.

You two ladies should consider rocket-surgery for a living.

 

[Sledog]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

 

[HHusky]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

 

[Sledog]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

You never heard any of the testimony go listen.

 

[HHusky]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

You never heard any of the testimony go listen.

What a pussy.

 

[TurdBomber]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

You never heard any of the testimony go listen.

What a pussy.

Irony lost on the Merit Scholar QB. Shocking.

 

[HHusky]

[/b]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

You never heard any of the testimony go listen.

What a pussy.

Irony lost on the Merit Scholar QB. Shocking.

Starting[/b] QB.

Let’s not scrimp on the glory.

 

[Goduckies]

The evidence was proven…even the cat lady’s lawyer was left stuttering several times. The judge even agreed that it happened…the threshold for this (and other) hacks has now become if you don’t have the person who actually did it on the stand confessing that they did it specifically to cheat then you don’t have the “intent” proof of why it happened so you can’t do anything. Which is absolutely insane for criminal matters, much less civic matters. Esp since the defendant was in charge of the election. How many people would be found guilty of rape or murder with this idiotic threshold? But it’s an easy goal post to move, esp on Christmas Eve when everyone is distracted.

We live in a #BananaRepublic…for all those who are trying to rationalize their way around it realize you’ve got a speed-limit IQ HondoFS urging you on…

Were there enough votes to change the outcome? If so what were the totals?

 

[MelloDawg]

Imagine they admitted to doing it on the witness stand but that somehow isn't proof.

Admitted to what, Mall Cop? Use your words.

You never heard any of the testimony go listen.

Ah, testimony matters now. Got it.

“Heard it from a friend who…heard it from a friend who…”

 

[HHusky]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

 

[TurdBomber]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

It's no surprise that you believe the Court was ruling on who won or lost. JFC.

How's that University of Guam Law Degree working out for ya?

 

[HHusky]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

It's no surprise that you believe the Court was ruling on who won or lost. JFC.

How's that University of Guam Law Degree working out for ya?

“We wuz robbed!” was the theory of the case.

It actually breaks up into four elements which have to be proven under Arizona law. One of those is that the outcome was clearly changed. Kari’s absolute BEST witness can be taken at his word and that element was not proven. You girls could learn a lot simply by reading the decision you’re all whining about.

Republican appointed judge was in on it?

 

[TurdBomber]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

It's no surprise that you believe the Court was ruling on who won or lost. JFC.

How's that University of Guam Law Degree working out for ya?

“We wuz robbed!” was the theory of the case.

It actually breaks up into four elements which have to be proven under Arizona law. One of those is that the outcome was clearly changed. Kari’s absolute BEST witness can be taken at his word and that element was not proven. You girls could learn a lot simply by reading the decision you’re all whining about.

Republican appointed judge was in on it?

We'll never know, will we? And you're fine with that when it benefits your pinko-commie side.

81 Million. Mmm-Hmm.

 

[HHusky]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

It's no surprise that you believe the Court was ruling on who won or lost. JFC.

How's that University of Guam Law Degree working out for ya?

“We wuz robbed!” was the theory of the case.

It actually breaks up into four elements which have to be proven under Arizona law. One of those is that the outcome was clearly changed. Kari’s absolute BEST witness can be taken at his word and that element was not proven. You girls could learn a lot simply by reading the decision you’re all whining about.

Republican appointed judge was in on it?

We'll never know, will we? And you're fine with that when it benefits your pinko-commie side.

81 Million. Mmm-Hmm.

Said the dumb shit who doesn’t think 81 million Americans would happily vote against Daddy.

 

[TurdBomber]

I’ve read the decision, Mall Cop. Even the witness who was most generous to Kari’s position didn’t testify that she was the winner.

It's no surprise that you believe the Court was ruling on who won or lost. JFC.

How's that University of Guam Law Degree working out for ya?

“We wuz robbed!” was the theory of the case.

It actually breaks up into four elements which have to be proven under Arizona law. One of those is that the outcome was clearly changed. Kari’s absolute BEST witness can be taken at his word and that element was not proven. You girls could learn a lot simply by reading the decision you’re all whining about.

Republican appointed judge was in on it?

We'll never know, will we? And you're fine with that when it benefits your pinko-commie side.

81 Million. Mmm-Hmm.

Said the dumb shit who doesn’t think 81 million Americans would happily vote against Daddy.

Says the dumb shit who believes 81 million did vote for Biden.