Comey needs to go to prison

From pbs last year, sociologists say few want violence but think the other side does...

Still, experts warned against presuming that too many Americans are so radicalized that they might engage in politically motivated violence.
Joe Mernyk, a doctoral student in Stanford University’s Polarization and Social Change Lab, surveyed Democrats and Republicans about their support for political violence and found it to be very low. But perceptions of those in the other party provided a different picture: People in each party believed members of the other had high support for violence.
When participants were told that, in fact, support for violence was low on the other side, their own support for violence dropped even lower, Mernyk said,
Mernyk stressed the importance of “making sure people know these people, like the guy in Utah, are not representative of the Republican Party or the party’s attitudes.”
Did you actually just quote PBS? You're a bigger fag than I previously thought.
 
there was nothing of substance in this thread to begin with
Well, since you and your dunderhead buddies thought comey was talking about 86'ing something off a menu, then yeah, this thread has nothing for you.
You frigging idiot.
 
Nothing of substance in Hunter's laptop. Signed, 51 FBI employees.
No substance to Biden's mental decline

I sense a pattern
 
You didn't seem to mind when bucky turned minimum wage into tariffs
Your hypocrisy is just so impressive we have to comment on it
 
Communists are a special breed of stupid. The BidenBros have their applications in already.
 
image.png

Murdering Trump is part of the Demonrat party doctrine.
 
From pbs last year, sociologists say few want violence but think the other side does...

Still, experts warned against presuming that too many Americans are so radicalized that they might engage in politically motivated violence.
Joe Mernyk, a doctoral student in Stanford University’s Polarization and Social Change Lab, surveyed Democrats and Republicans about their support for political violence and found it to be very low. But perceptions of those in the other party provided a different picture: People in each party believed members of the other had high support for violence.
When participants were told that, in fact, support for violence was low on the other side, their own support for violence dropped even lower, Mernyk said,
Mernyk stressed the importance of “making sure people know these people, like the guy in Utah, are not representative of the Republican Party or the party’s attitudes.”
Did you actually just quote PBS? You're a bigger fag than I previously thought.
The point is dumbfuck, that each side 1) believes the other wants violence, and 2) you believe everybody on the other side is the same.

And neither of these are shown true in sociology studies. Fuck off!
 
Last edited:
From pbs last year, sociologists say few want violence but think the other side does...

Still, experts warned against presuming that too many Americans are so radicalized that they might engage in politically motivated violence.
Joe Mernyk, a doctoral student in Stanford University’s Polarization and Social Change Lab, surveyed Democrats and Republicans about their support for political violence and found it to be very low. But perceptions of those in the other party provided a different picture: People in each party believed members of the other had high support for violence.
When participants were told that, in fact, support for violence was low on the other side, their own support for violence dropped even lower, Mernyk said,
Mernyk stressed the importance of “making sure people know these people, like the guy in Utah, are not representative of the Republican Party or the party’s attitudes.”
Did you actually just quote PBS? You're a bigger fag than I previously thought.
The point is dumbfuck, that each side 1) believe the other wants violence, and 2) you believe everybody on the other side is the same.

And neither of these are shown true in sociology studies. Fuck off!

MSN
 
From pbs last year, sociologists say few want violence but think the other side does...

Still, experts warned against presuming that too many Americans are so radicalized that they might engage in politically motivated violence.
Joe Mernyk, a doctoral student in Stanford University’s Polarization and Social Change Lab, surveyed Democrats and Republicans about their support for political violence and found it to be very low. But perceptions of those in the other party provided a different picture: People in each party believed members of the other had high support for violence.
When participants were told that, in fact, support for violence was low on the other side, their own support for violence dropped even lower, Mernyk said,
Mernyk stressed the importance of “making sure people know these people, like the guy in Utah, are not representative of the Republican Party or the party’s attitudes.”
Did you actually just quote PBS? You're a bigger fag than I previously thought.
The point is dumbfuck, that each side 1) believe the other wants violence, and 2) you believe everybody on the other side is the same.

And neither of these are shown true in sociology studies. Fuck off!

MSN
That's a subtle but crucial twist.

"While it is always difficult to wish ill of another human being, would America be better off if Donald Trump had been killed last weekend?"

That isn't asking for violence but the result of it. Not the same thing.
 
Let's talk about the summer of love. Let's talk about demonrat politicians telling their constituents to riot and get in people faces. Lets talk about our own government under the guy your voted for giving USAID money to hundreds of these organizations. Let's talk about your parties foot soldiers like ANTIFA. Let's talk about every mass shooter being a lefty trans loon….

The fucking list goes on forever.

You'll know when actual Americans get violent.

image.png
 
Last edited:
Per usual, Mt Rapinoe has nothing of value to add so he goes to his well of whataboutism, meltdown, sewing circle.
Please alert me when he (or Mello) has an original thought.
 
Back
Top