D
[Deleted User]
Guest
It's called Clipper fan since their entire history mirrors the Coogs and their forever ending penis envy of the Lakers just says it all.
Clippers
- Thread starter Fire_Marshall_Bill
- Start date
It's called Clipper fan since their entire history mirrors the Coogs and their forever ending penis envy of the Lakers just says it all.
allpurpleallgold
New Fish
I didn't even think it was a foul. It was pretty minimal contact.
Tequilla
Active poster
1) Blake Griffin fouling out in 19 minutes is a fucking joke ... not even Shawn Kemp was that FS.
2) There have been numerous examples since the replay system has come into play whether it be in the NBA or NCAA where a ref makes a call on a possession that doesn't turn the game into a free throw shooting contest and instead awards the ball in the direction of who was fouled. When you go to the replay, without the ability to make up for the fact that you didn't call for the foul you get the wrong outcome.
You could argue that Paul wasn't fouled but it was an absolute reach - but not a terrible reach. I understand an official deciding that he wasn't going to call a shooting foul in that situation since the Clippers were in the bonus but were instead going to give a sideline out of bounds play. Anybody that has ever played or officiated the game knows that these kind of calls happen and nobody ever really questions them.
I'm all for replay for where it makes sense. But let's not use replay to take away from common sense.
2) There have been numerous examples since the replay system has come into play whether it be in the NBA or NCAA where a ref makes a call on a possession that doesn't turn the game into a free throw shooting contest and instead awards the ball in the direction of who was fouled. When you go to the replay, without the ability to make up for the fact that you didn't call for the foul you get the wrong outcome.
You could argue that Paul wasn't fouled but it was an absolute reach - but not a terrible reach. I understand an official deciding that he wasn't going to call a shooting foul in that situation since the Clippers were in the bonus but were instead going to give a sideline out of bounds play. Anybody that has ever played or officiated the game knows that these kind of calls happen and nobody ever really questions them.
I'm all for replay for where it makes sense. But let's not use replay to take away from common sense.
Tequilla, I agree with some of your thoughts regarding replay. They overdo it, and the last 2 minutes of the game were kind of ridiculous, but the ball was off Paul, and you can't go back and call a foul (very ticky tack and not a foul). You can go back and see who it was off, and it was the correct call.
CuntWaffle
New Fish
My Clippers will be fine.
Tequilla
Active poster
RD,
I agree with you in that they got the call right based on what the current rules are.
What I'm getting at there is that I would rather that an official looks at that play and decides that it's not enough to call a foul for but that given the contact it caused the ball to go out on the player that was fouled, and as such, even the calls out and just give a sideline out of bounds play.
I'd rather that we didn't live in a situation where officials aren't able to use their judgment in officiating games.
I agree with you in that they got the call right based on what the current rules are.
What I'm getting at there is that I would rather that an official looks at that play and decides that it's not enough to call a foul for but that given the contact it caused the ball to go out on the player that was fouled, and as such, even the calls out and just give a sideline out of bounds play.
I'd rather that we didn't live in a situation where officials aren't able to use their judgment in officiating games.
I think they will too, but it's going to be tough to win one at Golden State.
