Are they an actual threat or will they go out in the second round again?
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Mostly because He hasn't ever had enough around Him to get to the Finals. Even this year that is the case. Griffin has improved quite a bit and there are some nice other pieces but not enough to carry them to the finals without a break out performance from someone unexpected. Unless you believe the black hole aka Jamaal Crawford will change his ways. Paul can score 35 pts if He has to. But chances are they won't win if He does. I'd argue that GS has more pieces to get further with the splash bros, Lee, Iggy, Barnes and Green. When they are rolling, they can put 40 pt quarters on ya easy.
The year Paul had the most around him was with the NO Hornets when they made the Conf finals. Given how loaded from top to bottom the West is this year, losing in the 2nd rd isn't exactly shameful.
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Mostly because He hasn't ever had enough around Him to get to the Finals. Even this year that is the case. Griffin has improved quite a bit and there are some nice other pieces but not enough to carry them to the finals without a break out performance from someone unexpected. Unless you believe the black hole aka Jamaal Crawford will change his ways. Paul can score 35 pts if He has to. But chances are they won't win if He does. I'd argue that GS has more pieces to get further with the splash bros, Lee, Iggy, Barnes and Green. When they are rolling, they can put 40 pt quarters on ya easy.
The year Paul had the most around him was with the NO Hornets when they made the Conf finals. Given how loaded from top to bottom the West is this year, losing in the 2nd rd isn't exactly shameful.
He has plenty to get in the finals. I don't know what more he could really have. He's a very good player, but also overrated. Tony Parker and Steph Curry are better.
I've seen rankings with Paul as the third best player in the NBA. He's maybe borderline top 10. If Durant was on the Clippers instead of Paul, they would win 65 games and easily win the title, even with Darren Collison at PG.
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Mostly because He hasn't ever had enough around Him to get to the Finals. Even this year that is the case. Griffin has improved quite a bit and there are some nice other pieces but not enough to carry them to the finals without a break out performance from someone unexpected. Unless you believe the black hole aka Jamaal Crawford will change his ways. Paul can score 35 pts if He has to. But chances are they won't win if He does. I'd argue that GS has more pieces to get further with the splash bros, Lee, Iggy, Barnes and Green. When they are rolling, they can put 40 pt quarters on ya easy.
The year Paul had the most around him was with the NO Hornets when they made the Conf finals. Given how loaded from top to bottom the West is this year, losing in the 2nd rd isn't exactly shameful.
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Mostly because He hasn't ever had enough around Him to get to the Finals. Even this year that is the case. Griffin has improved quite a bit and there are some nice other pieces but not enough to carry them to the finals without a break out performance from someone unexpected. Unless you believe the black hole aka Jamaal Crawford will change his ways. Paul can score 35 pts if He has to. But chances are they won't win if He does. I'd argue that GS has more pieces to get further with the splash bros, Lee, Iggy, Barnes and Green. When they are rolling, they can put 40 pt quarters on ya easy.
The year Paul had the most around him was with the NO Hornets when they made the Conf finals. Given how loaded from top to bottom the West is this year, losing in the 2nd rd isn't exactly shameful.
He has plenty to get in the finals. I don't know what more he could really have. He's a very good player, but also overrated. Tony Parker and Steph Curry are better.
I've seen rankings with Paul as the third best player in the NBA. He's maybe borderline top 10. If Durant was on the Clippers instead of Paul, they would win 65 games and easily win the title, even with Darren Collison at PG.
I think there are a coupl things going on with Paul.
Number 1 people overrate the point guard position. It's pretty much the least important position in the NBA but people always say shit like 'it's a point guard league'. The best point guards to win a championship in the last 20 years are Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups and uh Rio Chalmers.
Number 2 people confuse who Chris Paul was with who he is. He had a knee injury that took a step from him. People see the guy he is now, a more cerebral player that controls the game, and cross it with the ridiculously fast guy he was before the injury and think yeah that guys a top 3 player.
He's a top 15 player for me. Hurt a little by his position. Hurt a little by the fact that he can't just blow by anyone anymore. He still gets to his spots but it's not the same.
I think there are a coupl things going on with Paul.
Number 1 people overrate the point guard position. It's pretty much the least important position in the NBA but people always say shit like 'it's a point guard league'. The best point guards to win a championship in the last 20 years are Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups and uh Rio Chalmers.
Number 2 people confuse who Chris Paul was with who he is. He had a knee injury that took a step from him. People see the guy he is now, a more cerebral player that controls the game, and cross it with the ridiculously fast guy he was before the injury and think yeah that guys a top 3 player.
He's a top 15 player for me. Hurt a little by his position. Hurt a little by the fact that he can't just blow by anyone anymore. He still gets to his spots but it's not the same.
Good post. Agree on the knee injury. I think Doogles is correct though. It's time to win or GTFO. I can't wait for their series against Golden State.
Chris Paul has been one of the best PGs for years, possibly the best. He may finish in 2nd or 3rd in stats but at least he is there every year. I think it is hard to qualify a point guard as the best because of how different that position can be played.
Can we stop doing the whole if someone doesn't have a ring they are overrated thing? Christ it gets annoying sometimes. In 2008 he pretty much put the team on its back and almost led them to the conference finals.
If we go strictly by NBA titles recently then Mario Chalmers, Jason Kidd, and Derek Fischer would be the fucking best, and I know you guys don't agree with that bullshit.
Chris Paul is one of the best if not the best currently. Stop pressing.
Chris Paul has been one of the best PGs for years, possibly the best. He may finish in 2nd or 3rd in stats but at least he is there every year. I think it is hard to qualify a point guard as the best because of how different that position can be played.
Can we stop doing the whole if someone doesn't have a ring they are overrated thing? Christ it gets annoying sometimes. In 2008 he pretty much put the team on its back and almost led them to the conference finals.
If we go strictly by NBA titles recently then Mario Chalmers, Jason Kidd, and Derek Fischer would be the fucking best, and I know you guys don't agree with that bullshit.
Chris Paul is one of the best if not the best currently. Stop pressing.
Is it too much to ask that he at least play in ONE conference finals before proclaiming him as the best? I mean Melo gets killed constantly but even he has led his team to a conference finals appearance.
Maybe it's the PL_SS cocktail i'm on, but why does Chris Paul get such a pass? He's universally lauded as the best PG in the game, yet he hasn't won shit. Why the kid gloves?
Mostly because He hasn't ever had enough around Him to get to the Finals. Even this year that is the case. Griffin has improved quite a bit and there are some nice other pieces but not enough to carry them to the finals without a break out performance from someone unexpected. Unless you believe the black hole aka Jamaal Crawford will change his ways. Paul can score 35 pts if He has to. But chances are they won't win if He does. I'd argue that GS has more pieces to get further with the splash bros, Lee, Iggy, Barnes and Green. When they are rolling, they can put 40 pt quarters on ya easy.
The year Paul had the most around him was with the NO Hornets when they made the Conf finals. Given how loaded from top to bottom the West is this year, losing in the 2nd rd isn't exactly shameful.
He has plenty to get in the finals. I don't know what more he could really have. He's a very good player, but also overrated. Tony Parker and Steph Curry are better.
I've seen rankings with Paul as the third best player in the NBA. He's maybe borderline top 10. If Durant was on the Clippers instead of Paul, they would win 65 games and easily win the title, even with Darren Collison at PG.