Clinton promises manditory gun confiscation

sarktastic

sarktastic

New Fish
This is going to go over well with those who believe in centralized, big government protection.

Wonder if this is the issue that will finally topple Bernie.
 
Time someone got serious about gun control!!

Doesn't anyone care for the victims of gun violence???

The nation is outraged and the people of this once great nation aren't going to take it anymore!!

 
They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
 
Last edited:
They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
Click to expand...

Just like the Brady bill was a slippery slope to confiscation, right?
 
The Australian bill that both Obama and Hillary are now advocating was not voluntary, it was mandatory.

I'm sure both of them appreciate the little internet lemmings like Hondo spreading out to ask where Hillary ever said she would confiscate guns.

but the fact is if they want that bill they want mandatory confiscation of guns.

Case closed. Man up and agree with them or don't
 
They won't come to our homes and take our guns. What they can do is control the flow of ammunition and new guns on the market, which in some ways they already do. They'll just take it up 35 notches. Absolutely wrong, but the left will say it's not the same thing. The purpose is the same, it just means going from point A to point B, but stopping at point C on the way, so don't twist.
Click to expand...

Just like the Brady bill was a slippery slope to confiscation, right?
Click to expand...

The Brady bill was the introduction of a background checking system. What does that have to do with this?

I'm also for even more strict background checks, as I've expressed on numerous occassions. The federal government is also wanting to restrict certain gun purchase from sane law abiding citizens, which I'm totally against. Don't throw Brady bill nonsense to confuse the argument. Most don't think so, but I tend to think you're better than that.
 
Last edited:
Sounds more like pandering to her audience than a promise to actually confiscate guns, but still more truth to the topic than I expected to see. Pretty dumb of her to even entertain the thought at this point. Thanks for the link.
 
Sounds more like pandering to her audience than a promise to actually confiscate guns, but still more truth to the topic than I expected to see. Pretty dumb of her to even entertain the thought at this point. Thanks for the link.
Click to expand...

I agree that it's probably pandering to a voting base, but I'm not ok voting for someone that probably didn't mean what he/she said in regards to gun ownership laws. This issue is such a big deal for me, that I'm not willing to take a chance on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top