Chickenhawk Biden Update: US open to sending troops into Iraq

I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.

Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html

US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq

(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.

"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.
Click to expand...

No it isn't

Did Biden run on this?

Nope

You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Click to expand...

He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.
Click to expand...

In 2011 they elected to pull out of Iraq two months early. I was oversaw the units that were training Iraqi military units and we had to scramble to get them out at the beginning of November instead of January. That was an Obama decision, not a Trump decision.
 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.

 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from war

Which your guys haven’t done.
 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

To be willing to go to war, you have to take a break from war

Which your guys haven’t done.
Click to expand...

We haven't got to war. We have got to virtue signaling and money spending with thousands of dead and wounded Americans. War is not having Rules of Engagement on requiring soldiers to take fire before engaging in limited action. War is Dresden and Hiroshima. You think the Taliban fear the Americans? Hell, you can taste the disrespect for the soft and stupid Americans from that shit hole.
 
I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.

Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html

US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq

(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.

"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.
Click to expand...

I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck them

Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them.
Click to expand...

I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.
Click to expand...

But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.
 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!
 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

So, it’s only the deaths due to Covid under Trump that trigger you. Got it, thanks!
Click to expand...

Kurd lives matter.
 
I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.

Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html

US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq

(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.

"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.
Click to expand...

I have no issues with NATO as long as the other members pay their fair share. But no, they make the US front the bill and continuously bash said country. Fuck them

Most of the other countries in NATO are entitled little bitches. No wonder liberals love them.
Click to expand...

I don’t disagree at all with your criticism of NATO and the former guy pushing for change in NATO was one of the few things I sort of agreed on. However that doesn’t mean that we leave NATO completely. You need a seat at the table if you want to push for change.
Click to expand...

But you can’t allow fiscally irresponsible countries like Germany to have seat and pay next to nothing.
Click to expand...

Germany gets more natural gas from Russia than any other country they buy from yet its Trump that is buddies with Putin. Russia just started up work again on NS2 as our? America Last president shuts down work on XL.

 
These Biden dick suckers will support anything
Click to expand...

They are now all-in for the West occupying Iraq again after a basic trial balloon from the Biden administration. No pushback at all from the “anti-war” Chickenhawks @HHusky and @These clowns won’t criticize Biden for anything.

Boner voted for it!
Click to expand...

Olga, I've never been anti-war. Sometimes you have to be willing to go to war.

My 2004 Presidential vote was entirely[/b][/i] premised on W being a better choice to continue the war effort.

You looking for dove? Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

Like I said, you’re a Chickenhawk.
 
I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.

Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html

US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq

(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.

"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.
Click to expand...

No it isn't

Did Biden run on this?

Nope

You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Click to expand...

He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.
Click to expand...

This aged well.
 
I had predicted new wars by summer but didn’t expect it this soon.

Halliburton, Raytheon, and the rest of the war machine needs some contracts right now from the Big Guy.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/02/18/politics/us-troops-iraq/index.html

US signals it is open to sending more troops to support NATO's mission in Iraq

(CNN) The Pentagon opened the door to the possibility of sending more American troops to the Middle East as part of a newly expanded NATO training mission to support Iraqi forces and ensure that ISIS does not rise again.

"The US is participating in the force generation process for NATO Mission Iraq and will contribute its fair share to this important expanded mission," Pentagon spokesperson Cmdr. Jessica L. McNulty told CNN. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin spoke about the mission with his NATO counterparts during a meeting with defense ministers on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Booooorrrrring. US involved with NATO again, big deal. It’s what most of us want.
Click to expand...

No it isn't

Did Biden run on this?

Nope

You're a bootlicker who follows your party line
Click to expand...

He didn’t have to run on it. He ran on returning competence to the White House and in foreign affairs. Active membership in global organizations such as NATO among others is part of that deal. It’s what was voted for and again, most of us wanted to happen.
Click to expand...

This aged well.
Click to expand...

The fact that he hasn't posted in well over a year but was active on the site last night tells me that he perhaps realized the error of his vote and feels the shame he should. That, or he is a giant pussy and doesn't want to face the Tug firing squad for his poor choices.
 
View attachment 49264
Click to expand...

Once again, we have a start date on the new I-5 bridge? Any new major transportation projects in Washington or Oregon to benefit the middle class as a result of the bill? Not here in Oregon. With the federal and state bureaucracies, nothing is shovel ready and nothing we need gets built.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top