Give me odds? Oregon doesn't bring in a transfer QB you give Derek $60. They do, I do $20.It's just such a lazy troll take after MPJ and Poor Man's Brownshorts combined for 11 years of CFB.The Duck Way is to pay for a veteran QB who will have more than 60 games under his belt by the time he "graduates." Seems to work pretty well. Why change now? It's not like money is limited or anything.
I think it is likely that someone other than Moore — someone not currently on Oregon's roster — will start next season as QB for the Ducks. I wouldn't put money on it being Moore, that's for sure.
I 100% believe that they want someone other than Smith and Novasad to back him up but Moore is the guy next year. He was pushing Gabriel in fall camp and the coaches/players are all in on him as the starter in 2025. He’s less of a runner and more of a scrambler to make plays on the move with his arm than either Nix or Gabriel but is just as accurate and has the arm to make any throw he wants. I’m more than confident in that succession plan.@thechatch When I was reading the duck board early in the season, I got the impression you guys didn’t like Moore. Your collective can pay for a guy to at least complete with the former ucla 5 star, why wouldn’t your coaches hedge against the average/bust possibility at the most important position on the field?
lolI hope it’s Moore.
He's the best player on the field. Enough said on thatDante "Moore money, more problems" will do everything it takes to win the game.
Sounds like we're fucked at QB next year. Sigh. Why even play the games?Dante Moore is a bust. That’s what everyone here is saying, who to believe?
Lanning actually has to play some tuff road games next yearSounds like we're fucked at QB next year. Sigh. Why even play the games?Dante Moore is a bust. That’s what everyone here is saying, who to believe?
yeah butt stillLanning has lost 2 (?) road games in 3 years if I'm not mistaken. UW and Oregon State
Is there any reason Washington can’t do that? Has it not done that? If not, why not?The Duck Way is to pay for a veteran QB who will have more than 60 games under his belt by the time he "graduates." Seems to work pretty well. Why change now? It's not like money is limited or anything.
I can't even tell with you.Is there any reason Washington can’t do that? Has it not done that? If not, why not?The Duck Way is to pay for a veteran QB who will have more than 60 games under his belt by the time he "graduates." Seems to work pretty well. Why change now? It's not like money is limited or anything.
If there is a QB out there who fits the mold and who UW can afford, absolutely.Is there any reason Washington can’t do that? Has it not done that? If not, why not?The Duck Way is to pay for a veteran QB who will have more than 60 games under his belt by the time he "graduates." Seems to work pretty well. Why change now? It's not like money is limited or anything.
Is there any reason why neutral site games are only played in like 3 NFL stadiums?Lanning's losses, if we get to count 14-1 twice, are to teams with a combined record of 64-7. 2 "neutral" (lol Atlanta vs ugga, Rob Mullens you fucking cuck), 2 road and 1 home(I forget which team).
I dunno but I hate it. CCGs and playoff games should have home field advantage until the natty.Is there any reason why neutral site games are only played in like 3 NFL stadiums?Lanning's losses, if we get to count 14-1 twice, are to teams with a combined record of 64-7. 2 "neutral" (lol Atlanta vs ugga, Rob Mullens you fucking cuck), 2 road and 1 home(I forget which team).
Probably will get more on campus games soon enough when the playoff expands againI dunno but I hate it. CCGs and playoff games should have home field advantage until the natty.Is there any reason why neutral site games are only played in like 3 NFL stadiums?Lanning's losses, if we get to count 14-1 twice, are to teams with a combined record of 64-7. 2 "neutral" (lol Atlanta vs ugga, Rob Mullens you fucking cuck), 2 road and 1 home(I forget which team).
What I'm asking is, given the NIL spend estimates that have been disclosed by the NCAA, Washington isn't that far behind Oregon in spend. If that's true, then what is the problem? Why haven't they done it? Did they get the kid sitting on the bench now for free? Was he not paid?If there is a QB out there who fits the mold and who UW can afford, absolutely.Is there any reason Washington can’t do that? Has it not done that? If not, why not?The Duck Way is to pay for a veteran QB who will have more than 60 games under his belt by the time he "graduates." Seems to work pretty well. Why change now? It's not like money is limited or anything.
Williams will need to be pushed.