But he's a serious scientist. FatErn has been exposed.
Carbon Emissions since 2000
- Thread starter Goduckies
- Start date
The hockey stick caused the renaissance! Imagine if that obviously man made fossil fuel burning euros enlightenment didn't happen! Imagine leaving out of the climate change chicanery! Gosh why did the climate scientists not include it? Oh yeah the earths' temp changes all by itself. The scientists are being paid to find climate change so they exclude data that proves them wrong! Maybe the sun has something to do with this mystery…
Last edited:
Good thread on science and experts
Highlight
Highlight
Liberal studies degree holders like H, bigern, and Mello like to talk about "the science".
Science is verifiable, able to be questioned and tested, repeatable, and open for good faith debate.
That's how you know this isn't real science.
Fringe
The Biden administration has finalized rules to ban the use of natural gas in new and renovated federal buildings, the Department of Energy announced Wednesday.
The Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings Rule aims to reduce pollution, improve air quality, and create good-paying jobs, among other benefits according to the government's press release.
"The Biden-Harris administration is practicing what we preach," Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said of her agency's rule. "Just as we are helping households and businesses across the nation save money by saving energy, we are doing the same in our own federal buildings."
The Biden administration has finalized rules to ban the use of natural gas in new and renovated federal buildings, the Department of Energy announced Wednesday.
The Clean Energy for New Federal Buildings and Major Renovations of Federal Buildings Rule aims to reduce pollution, improve air quality, and create good-paying jobs, among other benefits according to the government's press release.
"The Biden-Harris administration is practicing what we preach," Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said of her agency's rule. "Just as we are helping households and businesses across the nation save money by saving energy, we are doing the same in our own federal buildings."
No congressional vote needed when the donors run the country.
Peak retardation policy-wise and it’s a deliberate attempt to control the population as any fascist government has done throughout history. Lowers the standard of living for the poor and middle-class, too, but capital gains at 45% for the rich is red meat that Biden, if he had balls, would bypass Congress for as well. Instead, it’s just more lies that won’t happen but gets his dummies excited.
Free market principles, eh @HHusky?
No congressional vote needed when the donors run the country.
Peak retardation policy-wise and it’s a deliberate attempt to control the population as any fascist government has done throughout history. Lowers the standard of living for the poor and middle-class, too, but capital gains at 45% for the rich is red meat that Biden, if he had balls, would bypass Congress for as well. Instead, it’s just more lies that won’t happen but gets his dummies excited.
Free market principles, eh @HHusky?
Leftists will tell you we (?) need to lead by example for carbon polluters like China and India.
Ford’s EV unit just announced quarterly loss of $1.3 billion. Or $132,000 loss on every one of the 10,000 vehicles sold.
Last edited:
It'll save the planet! Cheap at twice the price!
""The Biden-Harris administration is practicing what we preach," Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said of her agency's rule. "Just as we are helping households and businesses across the nation save money …" Yep, sure. Dems love to help households and businesses save money. Cali with its carbon tax and huge renewable mandates versus Utah which still has some coal plants and much lower renewable mandates.
They make up for it with volume!
Old business joke.
I refuse to believe that these American car manufacturers all decided investing massively in EVs was good business. Basic market research and focus groups laying out pros and cons would get the idea laughed out of a planning committee.
My question is … why did they do it? It was obviously going to fail based on the current infrastructure for EV use alone.
Moral cowardice combined with the herd mentality that somehow this would all turn out because everyone really cared. Big US corporations and there commitment to honesty and resistance to corporate fascism is negligible. You could do the same with the manufacturing unions - UAW, Steel workers, pipe and steam fitters all bought into DEI, open borders, unlimited abortion all of which hurt their actual workers.
Car makers have a staff geologist on staff for those decisions
Climate thread bump for bot
Racist!
Zach gave away the ending