Can't wait to see who HC Wilcox brings in as his OC.

Yea this is year five. I mean even year one you can maybe chalk it up as "learning on the job" but that ship has sailed a long time ago.

Still making bonehead in game decisions, special teams still sucks, still making a ton of dumb penalties.
 
No joke, I'm almost ready to jump on the #FireSarkHireWilcox bandwagon. Dude would be a beast with a real OC.
 
You know who else was a great DC for UW?

2008246072.jpg
 
You know who else was a great DC for UW?

2008246072.jpg
Click to expand...
Not the same thing at all, for at least a couple of reasons.

1) Wilcox isn't a career assistant. He's clearly going to be a HC for someone.

2) Wilcox doesn't have all his experience at one school and under one HC. Lambo, much like Sark, only really knew one way of doing things, he didn't have exposure to multiple coaching philosophies, or have an established coaching network. Wilcox has all those things (and success at multiple stops).

3) Wilcox has proven that talented coaches want to work for him.

There's no guarantees that Wilcox will be a successful HC, but I'd honestly be very surprised if he's not. He has all the makings. He's not Sark, Lambo or Gilby.

 
You know who else was a great DC for UW?

2008246072.jpg
Click to expand...
Not the same thing at all, for at least a couple of reasons.

1) Wilcox isn't a career assistant. He's clearly going to be a HC for someone.

2) Wilcox doesn't have all his experience at one school and under one HC. Lambo, much like Sark, only really knew one way of doing things, he didn't have exposure to multiple coaching philosophies, or have an established coaching network. Wilcox has all those things (and success at multiple stops).

3) Wilcox has proven that talented coaches want to work for him.

There's no guarantees that Wilcox will be a successful HC, but I'd honestly be very surprised if he's not. He has all the makings. He's not Sark, Lambo or Gilby.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with you. I'd just like to see UW hire someone who has actually proven to be a good HC next time.
 
I'd also add, the last time Whiskey was advocating hiring a coordinator as HC, it was Chip Kelly.

Whiskey can spot coaching talent. It's a damn shame he's not our AD.
 
I'd also add, the last time Whiskey was advocating hiring a coordinator as HC, it was Chip Kelly.

Whiskey can spot coaching talent. It's a damn shame he's not our AD.
Click to expand...

Fuck, now I have to admit I was wrong.
 
You know who else was a great DC for UW?

2008246072.jpg
Click to expand...
Not the same thing at all, for at least a couple of reasons.

1) Wilcox isn't a career assistant. He's clearly going to be a HC for someone.

2) Wilcox doesn't have all his experience at one school and under one HC. Lambo, much like Sark, only really knew one way of doing things, he didn't have exposure to multiple coaching philosophies, or have an established coaching network. Wilcox has all those things (and success at multiple stops).

3) Wilcox has proven that talented coaches want to work for him.

There's no guarantees that Wilcox will be a successful HC, but I'd honestly be very surprised if he's not. He has all the makings. He's not Sark, Lambo or Gilby.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with you. I'd just like to see UW hire someone who has actually proven to be a good HC next time.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I really think Wilcox will be a good HC. After so many blunders I just hate to take chances though. We need someone who won't spend five years learning (or not) on the job.
 
You know who else was a great DC for UW?

2008246072.jpg
Click to expand...
Not the same thing at all, for at least a couple of reasons.

1) Wilcox isn't a career assistant. He's clearly going to be a HC for someone.

2) Wilcox doesn't have all his experience at one school and under one HC. Lambo, much like Sark, only really knew one way of doing things, he didn't have exposure to multiple coaching philosophies, or have an established coaching network. Wilcox has all those things (and success at multiple stops).

3) Wilcox has proven that talented coaches want to work for him.

There's no guarantees that Wilcox will be a successful HC, but I'd honestly be very surprised if he's not. He has all the makings. He's not Sark, Lambo or Gilby.
Click to expand...

I actually agree with you. I'd just like to see UW hire someone who has actually proven to be a good HC next time.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I really think Wilcox will be a good HC. After so many blunders I just hate to take chances though. We need someone who won't spend five years learning (or not) on the job.
Click to expand...

I'm a fan of Wilcox and wouldn't mind hiring him if he becomes a successful coach at the MWC or WAC.

I want a guy who has a defensive background and was a successful coordinator. I also want that coach to be a proven successful head coach as well.

Like the Fresno State head coach who I pointed out at the start of the year who IrishDoogFS mocked me for is the type of coach I'd really want.
 
Its not just Wilcox...he has a great staff of assistants. Tosh is a great recruiter and many of his DL at Cal went to the NFL. Sirmon and Heyward are future DC's.

I was mocked before the season when I said Wilcocks would build a top 10 D here.
 
Its not just Wilcox...he has a great staff of assistants. Tosh is a great recruiter and many of his DL at Cal went to the NFL. Sirmon and Heyward are future DC's.

I was mocked before the season when I said Wilcocks would build a top 10 D here.
Click to expand...

Still need to let it play out, but I'll acknowledge you could be right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top