Can a Leftist Tugtard explain what Trump did that merits a $454 million seizure of assets?

RaceBannon said:
In commercial real estate there are no lies
And in Trump’s case there is no injured party
The banks made the loans and got paid back
Click to expand...
All true. Personally I'd like us to start clamping down on the dirty lies and fraud of commercial real estate. If Trump is to be the coincidental martyr then so be it. A fitting act of selflessness after a lifetime of service.
 
GreenRiverGatorz said:
RaceBannon said:
GreenRiverGatorz said:
RaceBannon said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1773035844342808684
What a tangled web we weave

https://twitter.com/x/status/1773037755393569054
Click to expand...
The lifelong renters of twitter are telling on themselves
Click to expand...
The lifelong never had a business or got a loan folks told on themselves. I bought a house in 1987 and rang it up like an ATM until Wa Mu died
You guys aren't smart. If you were you wouldn't be applauding this bullshit
Click to expand...
As you should have. And you paid taxes based on what a third party assessed for you. Twitter is struggling with that concept, but I know you aren't.
If you lied on an application for a business loan then that's between you and your rabbi. I don't weigh in on spiritual matters.
Click to expand...
Come on now. This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million. That’s so fucking stupid but maybe even you buy it. Never mind that banks aren’t handing out loans of the size of Trump’s without doing their own asset assessments. It’s a political hit job obvious to anyone who isn’t a completely lost Democrat or a vindictive asshole like @HHusky.
 
GreenRiverGatorz said:
RaceBannon said:
In commercial real estate there are no lies
And in Trump’s case there is no injured party
The banks made the loans and got paid back
Click to expand...
All true. Personally I'd like us to start clamping down on the dirty lies and fraud of commercial real estate. If Trump is to be the coincidental martyr then so be it. A fitting act of selflessness after a lifetime of service.
Click to expand...
Why? Who got hurt? You don't think banks can handle their business?
You can ask for anything. They tell you what you get
Real estate is worth what someone will pay or loan on
Case closed
 
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
My understanding is that if banks loaned him money, there is no fraud.
 
MelloDawg said:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
My understanding is that if banks loaned him money, there is no fraud.
Click to expand...
Maybe with your understanding you can tell us what the fraud was
Who am I kidding?
 
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
It’s the amount the judge used in his judgement so yes, he accepted it at a value of $18 million. Fascist asshole.
 
RaceBannon said:
MelloDawg said:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
My understanding is that if banks loaned him money, there is no fraud.
Click to expand...
Maybe with your understanding you can tell us what the fraud was
Who am I kidding?
Click to expand...
Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
 
HHusky said:
RaceBannon said:
MelloDawg said:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
My understanding is that if banks loaned him money, there is no fraud.
Click to expand...
Maybe with your understanding you can tell us what the fraud was
Who am I kidding?
Click to expand...
Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
According to some guy. Fucking fascist.
 
EverettChris said:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
It’s the amount the judge used in his judgement so yes, he accepted it at a value of $18 million. Fascist asshole.
Click to expand...
Nope. Mar-a-Lago's value didn't factor into the calculation at all. Imagine my surprise at you being so hopelessly ignorant and wrong.
 
HHusky said:
RaceBannon said:
MelloDawg said:
HHusky said:
"This judge had Mar-a-lago valued at $18 million."
He didn't, of course. But you girls can't be troubled to read anything.

Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
My understanding is that if banks loaned him money, there is no fraud.
Click to expand...
Maybe with your understanding you can tell us what the fraud was
Who am I kidding?
Click to expand...
Daddy's fraud was "intentionally and knowingly valuing Mar-a-Lago as if it could be sold as a single family
residence despite the deed restrictions that require it to be a social club in perpetuity."
Click to expand...
Bullshit
Who was hurt?
Keep flailing fascist
 
image.jpeg
 
HHusky said:
thechatch said:
@HHusky is this prosecution politically motivated?
This is a yes or no question.
Please and thank you
Click to expand...
At all? Yes.
Solely? No.
Click to expand...
Why has no one else ever been prosecuted under that law for what they are accusing Trump of. Why would a DA just pick someone to investigate out of thin air. Oh yeah she hates Trump and her campaign slogan was all about prosecuting Trump for something. This is how far they had to go to find anything. IRS found nothing as well. That the white house was involved in all Trump cases tells you all you need to know.
 
Last edited:
Why has no one else ever been prosecuted under that law for what they are accusing Trump of. [sic]
Just as untrue as untrue can be. It's not even the first time Daddy has been sued using the statute. He's been a grifter for a long time.
 
HHusky said:
Why has no one else ever been prosecuted under that law for what they are accusing Trump of. [sic]
Just as untrue as untrue can be. It's not even the first time Daddy has been sued using the statute. He's been a grifter for a long time.
Click to expand...
Bullshit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top