Can a Leftist Tugtard explain what Trump did that merits a $454 million seizure of assets?

MelloDawg said:
EverettChris said:
MelloDawg said:
I enjoy this thread for so many reasons.
Please continue.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. You’re an autistic asshole and you think you’re clever yet can’t answer the question addressed to you in this thread.
I’m guessing you cup your own farts, too.
Click to expand...
Why am I being asked? I’m not a subject matter expert on this.
People who are, however, have said…well…you don’t seem to agree.
Click to expand...
I'm certainly more of a subject matter expert on this than the dazzler. No monetary damages and yet Trump is getting fined going on a $500 million. He still refuses to discuss actual damages and an unconstitutional fine and how this is an equal application of the law. You know who really is a subject matter expert? The actual MBA, attorneys and real estate financial experts at JP Morgan. But like with the chicom crud, mello has no interest in learning anything which he allegedly has a voting interest in. Sounds exactly like a troll of a government tit sucker.
 
WestlinnDuck said:
MelloDawg said:
EverettChris said:
MelloDawg said:
I enjoy this thread for so many reasons.
Please continue.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. You’re an autistic asshole and you think you’re clever yet can’t answer the question addressed to you in this thread.
I’m guessing you cup your own farts, too.
Click to expand...
Why am I being asked? I’m not a subject matter expert on this.
People who are, however, have said…well…you don’t seem to agree.
Click to expand...
I'm certainly more of a subject matter expert on this than the dazzler. No monetary damages and yet Trump is getting fined going on a $500 million. He still refuses to discuss actual damages and an unconstitutional fine and how this is an equal application of the law. You know who really is a subject matter expert? The actual MBA, attorneys and real estate financial experts at JP Morgan. But like with the chicom crud, mello has no interest in learning anything which he allegedly has a voting interest in. Sounds exactly like a troll of a government tit sucker.
Click to expand...
In this same thread there is evidence of Leticia James helping out a person who apparently did commit financial fraud while submitting a loan application.
Open fascism and Communism at the same time.
 
HHusky said:
"Reliance

Defendants have argued vociferously throughout the trial that there can be no fraud as, they
assert, that none of the banks or insurance companies relied on any of the alleged
misrepresentations . The proponents of this theory posit that lenders demand complex statements
of financial condition but then ignore them.

Defendants' argument is to no avail, as none of plaintiff's causes of action requires that it
demonstrate reliance. Instead, plaintiff must merely show that defendants intended to commit
the fraud. Reliance is not a requisite element of either Executive Law § 63(12) or of any of the
alleged Penal Law violations. See, e.g., People v Essner, 124 Misc 2d 830, 834 (Sup Ct, NY
County 1984) ( Reliance then is not an element of [Penal Law § 175.45 - Falsifying Business
Records] , and documents subpoenaed to prove or disprove reliance by the banks are
immaterial ).

However, the Court notes that, although not required, there is ample documentary and
testimonial evidence that the banks, insurance companies, and the City of New York did, in fact,
rely on defendants to be truthful and accurate in their financial submissions. The testimony in
this case makes abundantly clear that most, if not all, loans began life based on numbers on an
SFC, which the lenders interpreted in their own unique way. The testimony confirmed, rather
than refuted, the overriding importance of SFCs in lending decisions.*

*To take one of innumerable examples, Robert Unell testified that Deutsche Bank and Ladder Capital
would have analyzed Donald Trump's net worth based on the contents ofthe SFCs. Indeed, witness after
witness testified that the SFCs were important to them, and/ or were the starting point of their analysis."
(emphasis added for the rubes)
Click to expand...
Does this mean, that every person in New York who has ever tried to get more trade in value for their used car than it was actually worth to finance a new one, should they be nervous?
 
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
"Reliance

Defendants have argued vociferously throughout the trial that there can be no fraud as, they
assert, that none of the banks or insurance companies relied on any of the alleged
misrepresentations . The proponents of this theory posit that lenders demand complex statements
of financial condition but then ignore them.

Defendants' argument is to no avail, as none of plaintiff's causes of action requires that it
demonstrate reliance. Instead, plaintiff must merely show that defendants intended to commit
the fraud. Reliance is not a requisite element of either Executive Law § 63(12) or of any of the
alleged Penal Law violations. See, e.g., People v Essner, 124 Misc 2d 830, 834 (Sup Ct, NY
County 1984) ( Reliance then is not an element of [Penal Law § 175.45 - Falsifying Business
Records] , and documents subpoenaed to prove or disprove reliance by the banks are
immaterial ).

However, the Court notes that, although not required, there is ample documentary and
testimonial evidence that the banks, insurance companies, and the City of New York did, in fact,
rely on defendants to be truthful and accurate in their financial submissions. The testimony in
this case makes abundantly clear that most, if not all, loans began life based on numbers on an
SFC, which the lenders interpreted in their own unique way. The testimony confirmed, rather
than refuted, the overriding importance of SFCs in lending decisions.*

*To take one of innumerable examples, Robert Unell testified that Deutsche Bank and Ladder Capital
would have analyzed Donald Trump's net worth based on the contents ofthe SFCs. Indeed, witness after
witness testified that the SFCs were important to them, and/ or were the starting point of their analysis."
(emphasis added for the rubes)
Click to expand...
Does this mean, that every person in New York who has ever tried to get more trade in value for their used car than it was actually worth to finance a new one, should they be nervous?
Click to expand...
Or anyone who got a commercial real estate loan?
 
Leftist logic.
“Drumpf can sell Mar-a-logo for hundreds of millions of dollars to cover the bond!

Never mind Judge Bitch Tits valued the property at $18 million.
Full on Communism and Fascism on display in New York and the Rat media. Who fires the first shot? Looked like things got close yesterday with a bunch of military aged illegals attacking the Texas NG at the border.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1770978613049106835
 
WestlinnDuck said:
MelloDawg said:
EverettChris said:
MelloDawg said:
I enjoy this thread for so many reasons.
Please continue.
Click to expand...
Of course you do. You’re an autistic asshole and you think you’re clever yet can’t answer the question addressed to you in this thread.
I’m guessing you cup your own farts, too.
Click to expand...
Why am I being asked? I’m not a subject matter expert on this.
People who are, however, have said…well…you don’t seem to agree.
Click to expand...
I'm certainly more of a subject matter expert on this than the dazzler. No monetary damages and yet Trump is getting fined going on a $500 million. He still refuses to discuss actual damages and an unconstitutional fine and how this is an equal application of the law. You know who really is a subject matter expert? The actual MBA, attorneys and real estate financial experts at JP Morgan. But like with the chicom crud, mello has no interest in learning anything which he allegedly has a voting interest in. Sounds exactly like a troll of a government tit sucker.
Click to expand...
Perry Namath (noted QB/Lawyer/Biblical Scholar) stated the dollar amount was in line because Facebook was fined $5B in 2019 for violating customer privacy. A non-lawyer on the board pointed out the penalty for Zuckerberg and friends was under 1% of the company's market cap- yet Trump's is about 17% of his net worth.
 
Can we just agree that the Leftists here do not care about equal justice under rule of law?
Think of the three here.
H is a fat, stupid loser.
Buck is a spaz.
Mello is well into the autism spectrum yet also dumb.
All white guys, too.
 
EverettChris said:
Can we just agree that the Leftists here do not care about equal justice under rule of law?
Think of the three here.
H is a fat, stupid loser.
Buck is a spaz.
Mello is well into the autism spectrum yet also dumb.
All white guys, too.
Click to expand...
How about just about all dems. I really haven't heard one dem from the dysfunctional Tug leftards to the dems in Congress and the MSM show the slightest interest in equal justice under the rule of law. It's all about TDS and that keeping him off the ballot is true democracy. Hell, look what the dems did to Bernie to get PIPS nominated.
 
Judge makes up values and steals profits from Trump to put in state coffers.
Democrat Fascism is alive in New York and 40% of the country apparently supports it.

image.png
 
Reeks of James bluff being called. She got the call over the weekend that seizing Trump tower wasn't polling well.
 
Bob_C said:
Reeks of James bluff being called. She got the call over the weekend that seizing Trump tower wasn't polling well.
Click to expand...
I was looking forward to the attempt because these Fascists are going full steam ahead, so just stop pretending and lying and be Fascists in the open.
I wonder who made this decision so bond could be made? Had to be someone high in the White House.
 
Our saner readers will note that the inbreds cite both Daddy's wins and his losses as evidence of the "Deep State".
 
175 million is still outrageous, it's not a win to have to fork over that amount.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top