But we are in a 17 year cooling period
- Thread starter 2001400ex
- Start date
CuntWaffle
New Fish
I like to compare one month to 17 years. I do that.
HoustonHusky
New Fish
Why use satellite data when you can manipulate surface data?
Yet another example...http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html
Last edited:
the earth is 6000 years old
2001400ex
New Fish
Why use satellite data when you can manipulate surface data?
Yet another example...http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html
So I am supposed to believe a right wing conspiracy website over NASA, NOAA, and other governments that clearly show this will be the warmest year on record, and the almost all of the top 10 warmest years are in the last 17?
Did you even read that article?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics
HoustonHusky
New Fish
Why use satellite data when you can manipulate surface data?
Yet another example...http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html
So I am supposed to believe a right wing conspiracy website over NASA, NOAA, and other governments that clearly show this will be the warmest year on record, and the almost all of the top 10 warmest years are in the last 17?
Did you even read that article?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics
Pure satellite data unmolested by scientists with an agenda is now "ring wing conspiracy". Because everyone knows computers are right wing nutjobs.
Fucking moron.
2001400ex
New Fish
Why use satellite data when you can manipulate surface data?
Yet another example...http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html
So I am supposed to believe a right wing conspiracy website over NASA, NOAA, and other governments that clearly show this will be the warmest year on record, and the almost all of the top 10 warmest years are in the last 17?
Did you even read that article?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics
Pure satellite data unmolested by scientists with an agenda is now "ring wing conspiracy". Because everyone knows computers are right wing nutjobs.
Fucking moron.
Satellite data supports the exact same, and only goes back to 1979.
Here's a more clear picture than the one you sent. If you notice. Every year since 1998 was above the average and every year prior was below. My point still stands.
Last edited:
HoustonHusky
New Fish
Let's recap:
1) HondoFS: July was the hottest month on record
2) Reality: Satellite measurements show it wasn't close, and yet another example was given on why the NOAA data is a steaming pile of shite (a discussion we had and you lost several months back).
3) HondoFS: Yeah, look at the satellite data (which shows July wasn't even close to the hottest) followed by "My point still stands"
4) Reality: Do you remember your point, and do you realize how much of a moron you are?
Truly amazing...otherwise known as HondoFS...
OZONE
New Fish
It's funny that the anti-climate-change guys in that article focus so much on their conspiracy theory that climate change is an Obama conspiracy and that NOAA is altering data to support the conspiracy.
How do they explain the fact that scientists and governments all over the world agree that this is a major concern?
They probably assume it is a UN conspiracy... I'll look forward to their conspiracy theory on that soon. It is probably a communist plot?
But in conclusion... they don't dispute that the data showed July was hot... they just claim that the data was altered. Do they have proof?
They remind me of the "scientists" that used to work for big tobacco that claimed that data linked smoking to lung cancer was "made up". We all saw how that unfolded...
How do they explain the fact that scientists and governments all over the world agree that this is a major concern?
They probably assume it is a UN conspiracy... I'll look forward to their conspiracy theory on that soon. It is probably a communist plot?
But in conclusion... they don't dispute that the data showed July was hot... they just claim that the data was altered. Do they have proof?
They remind me of the "scientists" that used to work for big tobacco that claimed that data linked smoking to lung cancer was "made up". We all saw how that unfolded...
No, you dumbfuck, climate change isn't a myth. It is generally accepted there have been five Ice Ages in the planet's history. Which means it got really cold five times and really hot five times.
When it got really hot, the dinosauers flourished. When it got really cold, the dinosauers died.
What didn't happen before was a bunch of supposed experts bloviating about what man has done to cause it or what man can do to 'slow' it.
Climate change is going to happen. It's a matter of whether it is a couple thousand years or another 10,000 years before we are wiped out. Either way, I'm long fucking gone and any remnants of my sperm will be heavily diluted by Mexicans impregnating my descendants. So vote for Trump and buy another four years before that shit happens.
When it got really hot, the dinosauers flourished. When it got really cold, the dinosauers died.
What didn't happen before was a bunch of supposed experts bloviating about what man has done to cause it or what man can do to 'slow' it.
Climate change is going to happen. It's a matter of whether it is a couple thousand years or another 10,000 years before we are wiped out. Either way, I'm long fucking gone and any remnants of my sperm will be heavily diluted by Mexicans impregnating my descendants. So vote for Trump and buy another four years before that shit happens.
Same old recycled blah blah blah on climate change. The Big O rolled out climate change again. Just recycling an old rant saves time and brain cells.
Bingo
Last edited: