But hearsay!

[pawz]

Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.

Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.

Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.

How come you are so accomplished at identifying lying sacks of shit?

Not actually, but still.

Have you ever come across a lying sack of shit you didn’t messiah-worship?

.

 

[HHusky]

Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.

Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.

Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.

How come you are so accomplished at identifying lying sacks of shit?

Not actually, but still.

Have you ever come across a lying sack of shit you didn’t messiah-worship?

.

Personally, I find the concession that pawz doesn't know what hearsay is refreshing. Some of you other girls could learn a thing or two about honesty from your colleague.

 

[pawz]

 

[TurdBomber]

Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.

Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.

Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.

There was no judge ruling on evidence before the J6 commission. You, as a lawyer, as were many on the J6 commission should know what the hearsay rules and exceptions are all about: Reliable, relevant evidence. The only question on the J6 commission's collective mind was whether evidence favored or disfavored Trump, and if it went against him, it came in, automatically.
Lift your head up once in awhile Dazzler. Your edges have gone dull.

 

[Sledog]

Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.

Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.

Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.

There was no judge ruling on evidence before the J6 commission. You, as a lawyer, as were many on the J6 commission should know what the hearsay rules and exceptions are all about: Reliable, relevant evidence. The only question on the J6 commission's collective mind was whether evidence favored or disfavored Trump, and if it went against him, it came in, automatically.
Lift your head up once in awhile Dazzler. Your edges have gone dull.

The Dazzler never tires of sucking off demonrats.

 

[HHusky]

Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.

Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.

Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.

There was no judge ruling on evidence before the J6 commission. You, as a lawyer, as were many on the J6 commission should know what the hearsay rules and exceptions are all about: Reliable, relevant evidence. The only question on the J6 commission's collective mind was whether evidence favored or disfavored Trump, and if it went against him, it came in, automatically.
Lift your head up once in awhile Dazzler. Your edges have gone dull.

It was not a trial, (dumb) Shit.

 

[TurdBomber]

Made that point loud and clear, you dumb faggot @HomoHusky.
Now finish your rim job on Ferguson.