But hearsay!
- Thread starter HHusky
- Start date
Pitchfork51
Active poster
I really hate the fact that vanilla saves my previous half done responses to local storage
Mongoloid gets an auto Bill chin, and I can be stingy.
Last edited:
Cassidy lied
Liz withheld the evidence
Liz withheld the evidence
Everybody is lying except the gal who wasn’t there but heard something.
@HHusky’s favorite type of evidence is hearsay, not directly from those allegedly involved.. What an absolute dipshit. Sewer-level trolling.
Last edited:
Vindman heard a phone call
It's only going to get louder and more desperate as the dementia addled crook in the white house craters
It's only going to get louder and more desperate as the dementia addled crook in the white house craters
HHusky
New Fish
Vindman testifying as to what he personally heard Daddy say isn’t hearsay. It’s direct evidence. Don’t quit your day job.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.
And as to Cassidy, you’re correct that she can’t be a witness to Daddy’s tantrum. That would be hearsay. Hearsay is used all the time in investigations however.
Note - it is the definition of hearsay. Vindman saying what he claims to have heard not backed up by any evidence or transcript. The same shit you have been falling for over the years again and again
What a shitty lawyer
He listened to the phone call which was recorded. Vindman is a commie. Both of those loser are! Here you are you red!
Last edited:
HHusky
New Fish
Here's where you're right: hearsay does have a definition. Everything else you botched. But see how I led with a compliment?
White flag
I’m not even sure Vindman listened to that call because his testimony was much closer to Adam Schiff’s fever dream interpretation than to what was actually said in the official transcript. An impeachment for no reason other than Trump was going to stop the Ukraine money laundering scam that had been going on since Obama appointed Retard Joe as the point man for this otherwise Who Gives A Shit country. Joe’s on a call with the Ukrainian President explaining how Trump doesn’t understand why money to Ukraine is so important and this was prior to Trump or Zelensky getting into power.
TurdBomber
Active poster
It was all hearsay, but they took her word anyway. Dazzler must've advised the J6 Committee.
TurdBomber
Active poster
Admissible as a statement made by a PARTY OPPONENT you fucking idiot.
Thanks for conceding that Trump was the "Opponent" of the unbiased J6 Commission.
You can quit your day job now.
HHusky
New Fish
Admissible because it was extortion personally witnessed by Vindman. Not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted—being offered because it was a demand that Z do Daddy a "favor" in order to get the aid. No hearsay exception required, (dumb) Shit.
It literally wasn’t, though. Vindman lied. All of you lie. The money was given to Ukraine on time. Joe admitted to quid pro quo in his own words. Fire the Attorney General, or you don’t get your money. Closed case but your authoritarians set up the DOJ as a protection racket instead of a legitimate legal system. Holder even called himself Obama’s “Wingman,” you Retard. Got away with contempt of Congress because Token Barry wasn’t going to fire his fellow Token AG and have him prosecuted for things the Bannons and Navarros get jail time for doing.
Last edited:
HHusky
New Fish
We can't all be the paragons of virtue that you and Daddy are, Chrissy.