Brown getting canned after 8-5, 9-4 seasons

Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?

W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU

T = Arizona

Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
Click to expand...

That compares quite well to Sark's magical 2010 season of 6-6 (bowl game excluded for comparison purposes):

Syracuse, USC (only 8-5 in 2010), OSU, Cal, UCLA, WSU. Note the last four teams were all fucking dreck in 2010.

I appreciate all the research you are doing to prove my point for me.
Click to expand...

Pacific & Tulane compare to beating Pac 12 teams or Syracuse?? WTF??

Just a reminder, the majority of the Pac 10 was "fucking dreck" until the Oregon schools discovered football in the mid to late 90's.

And to the other dip shit who chimed in, this is a discussion about the college football landscape, not individual coaches.

Now SSBIAFF.
 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.
 
Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?

W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU

T = Arizona

Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
Click to expand...

Irishdawg has reached IMALOSER territory in this thread.
 
What's the only difference between and Irish wedding and funeral?

One less drunk.

Hopefully IrishDoog will be the one less drunk soon. DIAFF.
 
But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only passively aggressively puts down James to prop up Sark.

Again he doesn't support Sark.
 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

13 games times the DJ career win percentage .726 equals an average of 9.44 wins per season. He was basically an 8-3 coach over his career. It means most seasons today with 13 games would be 9-4 or 10-3. Some 11-2, 12-1 and 13-0, balanced with some 8-5 and some 7-6.

Look at DJ's record in detail and you see a lot of 10-2 (five times actually), which meant mathematically that there were a lot more 7 and 8 win seasons than most fans like to recall.

But the DJ standard in today's 13 game schedule is 9 or 10 wins per season on average. That is a high bar, but achievable.
Click to expand...

9.44 rounds up to 10 when you schedule a FCS game every year.
 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
Click to expand...

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??
 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
Click to expand...

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??
Click to expand...

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.
 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
Click to expand...

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??
Click to expand...

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.
Click to expand...

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!
 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
Click to expand...

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??
Click to expand...

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.
Click to expand...

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!
Click to expand...
+1

 
I love how Sven says 8 wins back then would be 10 wins, these doogs argue with him then provide facts to support his claim.

I feel like I'm on doogman again. Fuck.
Click to expand...

I must have missed those.

Selective reading again dip shit??
Click to expand...

But he doesn't support Sark at all. He only provides bull shit selective stats to try and show how James and Sark are similar. Don't take that as him supporting Sark though.
Click to expand...

I actually like discussions with Boobs, He will actually engage you with stats, facts, etc. And his vagina doesn't get sand in it like others, who then resort to their final comeback, Doog!!!
Click to expand...

I was told I'm either Boobs or Harv though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top