Brown getting canned after 8-5, 9-4 seasons

puppylove_sugarsteel

puppylove_sugarsteel

New Fish
And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)

You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
 
And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)

You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
Click to expand...
So you think Lindquist wins the jerb, or did you miss Cyley twerking in the 4th quarter against Boise?

 
And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)

You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
Click to expand...

If Sark goes 7-6 in 2014 with that schedule and everyone but Price, Parker, and Shamburger back, he is quite possibly, the worst coach in college football. PuppySteel could coach that team to 9 wins.

 
And a runner up to MNC in '10, and the crystal in '05 (Dumbshits think Saban is coming ) Oh Sark how could we even talk of firing you. 9-4 is a massive disappointment anywhere but Seattle. Better go 10-2 at the worst this year though, I got you nailed down to win the North (then you can return to 7-6 with a sophomore QB that hasn't taken a snap.)

You better not let me down homey! Then you and your sun soaked wife can move back to Cali.. and coach the Spartans. They have the same standards we do .
Click to expand...

If Sark goes 7-6 in 2014 with that schedule and everyone but Price, Parker, and Shamburger back, he is quite possibly, the worst coach in college football. PuppySteel could QB coach that team to 9 wins.
Click to expand...

 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

THIS! I hate when Doogs bring up "You'd fire James then cause he didn't win more than 7 regular season games until year 5" blah blah blah.

Big difference between going 7-4 against a schedule with no cream puffs like Idaho State than going 7-6 with an Idaho State/Portland State.
 
True, there were no cream puffs on the schedule. But Oregon State, Oregon, Cal, and Stanford in those days were usually pretty bad and damn near cupcake level. Even the Arizona schools always sucked except a few good years in the 90's.
 
True, there were no cream puffs on the schedule. But Oregon State, Oregon, Cal, and Stanford in those days were usually pretty bad and damn near cupcake level. Even the Arizona schools always sucked except a few good years in the 90's.
Click to expand...

People don't understand how hard it is to win games in the PAC 12 now that the Arizona schools are serious about football.
 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

I just love playing devil's advocate.

Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?

Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.

Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1....
 
Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?

W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU

T = Arizona

Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
 
c546a9fec2ac7772db76bbe7ed19c8dd.jpg
 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

I just love playing devil's advocate.

Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?

Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.

Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1....
Click to expand...

The extra conference game is against Colorado or Utah. This just in: they fucking suck. Thanks for proving my point.

I'm glad the 85 scholarship limit has brought the field back to Alabama and USC though. That's always a strong take.
 
Do you mean magical 7-4-1 seasons like this?

W = Stanford, Purdue, Pacific, Tulane, ASU, Beavs, WSU

T = Arizona

Pacific & Tulane may have been considered Div 1, but with the 100 scholarship rule, they were getting the players that now go to the subdivision.
Click to expand...

That compares quite well to Sark's magical 2010 season of 6-6 (bowl game excluded for comparison purposes):

Syracuse, USC (only 8-5 in 2010), OSU, Cal, UCLA, WSU. Note the last four teams were all fucking dreck in 2010.

I appreciate all the research you are doing to prove my point for me.

 
CDJ averaged 8.5 wins a year, though he got better as his career progressed and Mack seems to be regressing.
Click to expand...

8.5 wins in the Don James era = 10 wins in the extra game and fucktarded schedule era.
Click to expand...

I just love playing devil's advocate.

Are we sure? That extra game is now in conference. Do I need to post that stat about the NW schools during that era?

Also, this goes for all coaches. One of the most significant changes has been the reduction of scholarships to 85. That is why you have seen the rise of the mid major + the top level of sub division be able to compete with BCS schools.

Spin machine on in 3, 2, 1....
Click to expand...

The extra conference game is against Colorado or Utah. This just in: they fucking suck. Thanks for proving my point.

I'm glad the 85 scholarship limit has brought the field back to Alabama and USC though. That's always a strong take.
Click to expand...

Hold the phone, you can say Utah & Colorado suck, but if someone mentions the Pac 10 was a joke outside of UW, USC and UCLA for most years they are a Doog. Classic.

And if you can't see the 85 scholly rule change the landscape of college football, I can't help you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top