Brett Hundley not yet drafted

If he becomes a very good starter in the NFL, we can probably blame Mora and his staff for sucking on the developmental side of things.
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.
 
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.

But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.

SvenFS

I'm not talking about the NFL.

 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.

SvenFS

I'm not talking about the NFL.

Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

HTH
 


Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.

SvenFS

I'm not talking about the NFL.

Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.

Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.

HTH

You say hth as if I'm not already aware of that.
 
Last edited:
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.

SvenFS

I'm not talking about the NFL.

My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
 
Locker >>>> Hundley.

UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham

UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.

He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.

Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.

Sark

and

Ty Willingham...

case fucking closed.

Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.

Oh. Never mind.

SvenFS

I'm not talking about the NFL.

My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.

He had no real coaching until getting to the NFL

A college coach that just said, "run us to victory, Jack the Lad" was all the coaching he needed

You're right about him being FS and not going to Oregon.

He also kisses his mother on the lips.

WOOF
 
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.

But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?

I know. It's turned into the SEC.
 
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.

But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?

I know. It's turned into the SEC.

SEC quarterbacking is dreadful, but they are better in the trenches. That's why they win more natties.

Expert analysis
 
Back
Top