If he becomes a very good starter in the NFL, we can probably blame Mora and his staff for sucking on the developmental side of things.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.
Oh. Never mind.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.
Oh. Never mind.
SvenFS
I'm not talking about the NFL.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.
Oh. Never mind.
SvenFS
I'm not talking about the NFL.
Yea so... moving the goalposts works for his argument at the time.
Picking and poaching of arguments IS the message board game.
HTH
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.
Oh. Never mind.
SvenFS
I'm not talking about the NFL.
I don't think UCLAs offense was super talented Brett's first few years. I don't think he had a RB better than Polk, or a WR much better than Kearse.Locker >>>> Hundley.
UCLA is talented, and Mora, even with his issues, is >>>>>>>>>>> Sark and Ty fucking Willingham
UCLA wouldve been a better team with Locker than Hundley
He just played in an offense that in my opinion did a solid job of getting him into quick simple read then scramble situations. Locker had SarkFS try to make him Leinart.
Brett's college stats are significantly better than Lockners. His NFL combine numbers are nearly identical as well. I don't think Locker was a better QB than Brett.
Sark
and
Ty Willingham...
case fucking closed.
Lockner proved this poont by emerging to be an excellent quarterback with professional coaching.
Oh. Never mind.
SvenFS
I'm not talking about the NFL.
My poont is that if multiple coaches at multiple levels couldn't make him a good quarterback, he probably was never going to be a good quarterback. He chose to pay for Ty after all.
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.
But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?
Hundley was pretty good. He's not an NFL starter, but he was probably the 2nd best QB in the Pac last year. He was way better than Locker, but they do have similarities.
But how was the quarterbacking in the Pac-12 a fucking dreckfest?
I know. It's turned into the SEC.