Brett Hundley Had A Helluva Day At The NFL Combine

Its amazing what a great QB recruiter Sark was. He almost got Hundley. Oh well, we got our guys. Any news on how Derrick Brown and Antivirus Sims did at the combine?
 
I read that Hundley was one of the bigger losers of the combine based on his throwing and footwork. I didn't watch so i can't judge, but my guess is that bruin site is going full broog with their analysis.

I love how they compare his time to Newton and Kap when anyone with a half of brain can see the real comparison is Locker, who ran a 4.59.
 
Last edited:
I read that Hundley was one of the bigger losers of the combine based on his throwing and footwork. I didn't watch so i can't judge, but my guess is that bruin site is going full broog with their analysis.

I love how they compare his time to Newton and Kap when anyone with a half of brain can see the real comparison is Locker, who ran a 4.59.
Click to expand...

Locker is a rare case. I'm not sure there has ever been such a bad college QB get the hype Locker did. Hundley was criticized for losing every big game, but his worst year was significantly better than Locker's best.
 
I read that Hundley was one of the bigger losers of the combine based on his throwing and footwork. I didn't watch so i can't judge, but my guess is that bruin site is going full broog with their analysis.

I love how they compare his time to Newton and Kap when anyone with a half of brain can see the real comparison is Locker, who ran a 4.59.
Click to expand...

Locker is a rare case. I'm not sure there has ever been such a bad college QB get the hype Locker did. Hundley was criticized for losing every big game, but his worst year was significantly better than Locker's best.
Click to expand...

At what other school in college football history does a QB with a 14-26 record as a starter get listed in marketing three years after his departure as a "Legend"?
 
I read that Hundley was one of the bigger losers of the combine based on his throwing and footwork. I didn't watch so i can't judge, but my guess is that bruin site is going full broog with their analysis.

I love how they compare his time to Newton and Kap when anyone with a half of brain can see the real comparison is Locker, who ran a 4.59.
Click to expand...

Locker is a rare case. I'm not sure there has ever been such a bad college QB get the hype Locker did. Hundley was criticized for losing every big game, but his worst year was significantly better than Locker's best.
Click to expand...

At what other school in college football history does a QB with a 14-26 record as a starter get listed in marketing three years after his departure as a "Legend"?
Click to expand...

washington

DAMMIT
 
I think he'll stick around awhile even if he doesn't start. He's athletic and (unlike Lockner) durable. With as much dreck as there is at QB in the NFL, a lot of teams could use that as a backup.

He really should have game like a 6'3" Russell Wilson. But he doesnt. Slow decision making, inability to make deep reads, and struggles extending plays with his arm. That's where Wilson excels and Hundley has stagnated.
 
This is a fun website to play around with http://mockdraftable.com/

I'm a self-proclaimed Doog for Locker, so shut the fuck up before I start, but when you look at his combine results it is really easy to see why he was picked so high and why he'll get another chance in this league.

I have awoken from my doogish slumber with Locker, but the injuries have offered a nice smokescreen to how mediocre his accuracy and decision making are. There is going to be a little "what if" surrounding his career, when in reality he just isn't that good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top