Bowl Game rewatch thoughts

Just watched all the defensive snaps and focused in on the secondary... holy hell Brian Clay fucking sucked. Constantly took bad angles, and when he did he was way too slow to have any hope of making up for it. All the Jimmy Lake coaching in the world wasn't going to make up for his shortfalls. Even if Taylor Rapp underperforms DDY and Pepsi's expectations for him, he'll still be an improvement as a true frosh.

The skill gap between Gardenhire and Jones was very evident. Jones didn't get thrown at much, and when he did get thrown at his coverage was very tight. Gardenhire left too many open windows, especially against Michael Thomas (their stud WR). Jones was handling him just fine, but he fucked us up when Gardenhire was on him. Both big TDs by him were a result of bad Gardenhire coverage and a terrible angle taken by Clay.

Budda was an absolute savage filling in the slot corner role for King who was injured. Takes the right angles and his closing speed kills. Sweatpants boner inducing.
Click to expand...

Is this @NEsnake12's first worthwhile poast? I'll let you decide, but it very well may be!
 
All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, Daniels will have a strong senior season
Click to expand...

Should have had a strong Jr season
Click to expand...

As the 2nd/3rd string TE?
Click to expand...
http://www.snappytv.com/snaps/darre...n-state-at-washington-on-pac-12-washington_5s

that dude should be on the field more often than 2nd/3rd string
 
All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, Daniels will have a strong senior season
Click to expand...

Should have had a strong Jr season
Click to expand...

As the 2nd/3rd string TE?
Click to expand...
http://www.snappytv.com/snaps/darre...n-state-at-washington-on-pac-12-washington_5s

that dude should be on the field more often than 2nd/3rd string
Click to expand...

There must be something wrong with him that we can't see from on-field performance, because he plays at a high level. He's our best after the catch receiver and he's a dominating blocker.
 
All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, Daniels will have a strong senior season
Click to expand...

Should have had a strong Jr season
Click to expand...

As the 2nd/3rd string TE?
Click to expand...
http://www.snappytv.com/snaps/darre...n-state-at-washington-on-pac-12-washington_5s

that dude should be on the field more often than 2nd/3rd string
Click to expand...

There must be something wrong with him that we can't see from on-field performance, because he plays at a high level. He's our best after the catch receiver and he's a dominating blocker.
Click to expand...

Coaches are infallible. They never keep the better player on the bench for some fucktarded reason that has nothing to do with winning. Probably needs to buy in and suck Petermen's cock or go play for Utah
 
Just watched all the defensive snaps and focused in on the secondary... holy hell Brian Clay fucking sucked. Constantly took bad angles, and when he did he was way too slow to have any hope of making up for it. All the Jimmy Lake coaching in the world wasn't going to make up for his shortfalls. Even if Taylor Rapp underperforms DDY and Pepsi's expectations for him, he'll still be an improvement as a true frosh.

The skill gap between Gardenhire and Jones was very evident. Jones didn't get thrown at much, and when he did get thrown at his coverage was very tight. Gardenhire left too many open windows, especially against Michael Thomas (their stud WR). Jones was handling him just fine, but he fucked us up when Gardenhire was on him. Both big TDs by him were a result of bad Gardenhire coverage and a terrible angle taken by Clay.

Budda was an absolute savage filling in the slot corner role for King who was injured. Takes the right angles and his closing speed kills. Sweatpants boner inducing.
Click to expand...

Is this @NEsnake12's first worthwhile poast? I'll let you decide, but it very well may be!
Click to expand...

You only had that opinion because he stroked your ego and told you how special you were ...
 
All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, Daniels will have a strong senior season
Click to expand...

Pete hasn't had a good offense in four years. There hasn't been a single All PAC 12 player on offense his first two years here.

I think he's a solid head coach, but a borderline retard when it comes to his offensive scheme and play calling. That's what the first two years point to. He employs Jonathan Smith as his OC. Even if you blame the talent, it's hard to make an argument Pete and Smih's coaching hasn't held this team back.
 
The offense sucks when it matters. Thankfully Sark hadn't been fired when we beat USC with a whopping 17 points. Threw up all over ourselves against Oregon. Shut down by Stanford. Disappeared against ASU.

Same old story until it isn't
 
All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, Daniels will have a strong senior season
Click to expand...

Should have had a strong Jr season
Click to expand...

As the 2nd/3rd string TE?
Click to expand...
http://www.snappytv.com/snaps/darre...n-state-at-washington-on-pac-12-washington_5s

that dude should be on the field more often than 2nd/3rd string
Click to expand...

There must be something wrong with him that we can't see from on-field performance, because he plays at a high level. He's our best after the catch receiver and he's a dominating blocker.
Click to expand...

The word was he had the dropsies early in the season and during practice. Also he was the best blocking TE last season so it made sense for him to be a blocker and Perkins a receiver.

As I said earlier in the thread, now that they can use Sample and Dissly as legit blockers, Daniels is primed to have a much greater role as a receiver. He may become the #2 option after Ross. At the end of last season he got a few more targets as Sample developed some experience.
 
I'm hearing the last 3 games of 2015 show the capabilities of the offense going forward
Click to expand...

I want to agree, but all three of those defenses were fucking horrible.
Click to expand...

WSU's defense was respectable. It was average in most categories with a very good DL. That was a solid offensive performance and would have been very good if we made FG's or scored another TD.

Oregon St and Southern Miss D's were fucking horrible.
 
The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
 
I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.
Click to expand...

No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.
Click to expand...
Higher level discussion right here...lol

A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better?
Click to expand...

PRECISELY my point buttfuck. And linemen are required to release and block downfield on inside WR screens as well. Blocking downfield is the responsibility of both units. A screen play allows linemen to block past the LOS. They dont sit idle on WR screens you fucking idiot.
 
I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.
Click to expand...

No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.
Click to expand...
Higher level discussion right here...lol

A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better?
Click to expand...

All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
Click to expand...
If Pete is who we think he is, he will tear the screen play pages out of the playbook. If we can't complete passes on timing and post routes, shut the goddamn program down.
Click to expand...

 
The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Click to expand...

You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.
 
The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Click to expand...

You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.
Click to expand...

Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...
 
The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Click to expand...

You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.
Click to expand...

Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...
Click to expand...

Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...

Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top