AZDuck
New Fish
Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?
*snap* *gurgle* or *pop*
@bananasnblondes this made me LOL, because I always root against the kids
Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?
*snap* *gurgle* or *pop*
Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?
*snap* *gurgle* or *pop*
Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?
*snap* *gurgle* or *pop*
@bananasnblondes this made me LOL, because I always root against the kids
Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.
Which Adams injury derails the 2016 Natty run?
*snap* *gurgle* or *pop*
Another cute on liner from Tommy Hill
It's complete dooging to call this move by Helf a failure. Adams can ball and immediately helps Oregon. In the limited snaps I saw Lockie play, he was clearly not ready for primetime and shitting his pants. I don't know anything about that Mahalak guy but Adams can make throws in tight windows. Oregon's offense usually has someone streaking downfield open by 10 yards.
True he is not as good of a runner as Mariota, but he is good enough. If anything it means more touches for Freeman--who is incredible--Tyner, and whatever 5 star Running Back they have riding pine over there.
Maybe it's just abundance, but I find it fascinating how some of you are more excited about a potential Oregon drop off than a potential rise in Husky football. Hate to break it to you, but even if Oregon flounders, Stanford is still better than you, and Kal (crazy I know) is improving, and not that far behind you. After that, there's 4 teams in the South that are better than UW. Oregon falling, would be sure nice for you to see, but unless you get your shit together, it's not going to help you one bit.
Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.
Maybe it's just abundance, but I find it fascinating how some of you are more excited about a potential Oregon drop off than a potential rise in Husky football. Hate to break it to you, but even if Oregon flounders, Stanford is still better than you, and Kal (crazy I know) is improving, and not that far behind you. After that, there's 4 teams in the South that are better than UW. Oregon falling, would be sure nice for you to see, but unless you get your shit together, it's not going to help you one bit.
Having a realistic shot at beating Oregon is what gets people excited (because nothing else matters).
You Ducks are getting nervous because:
- Warshington is actually serious about football and has a good coach
- Kelly is gone and the replacement is coasting off of his success.
@BallSacked - early days to forecast how Oregon does this fall.
Adams graduates from EWU on June 13 and will be in Eugene on June 14. There are those who think that Oregon's DL will actually be *better* next year, and that the OL should be about the same given that we play the OL in platoon fashion. I have lots of confidence in our line coaches, either way. Adams gives me confidence that Oregon will have a QB capable of managing the game next fall, and who will be able to distribute the ball to the very talented players in the backfield.
Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.
I think ASU, UCLA, AZ, and USC are huge threats to Oregon next year. My problem with Stanford is that now without Montgomery, they have absolutely nobody on the outside that can threaten teams. They also still lack the bruising tailback needed in their system, maybe a year from now it will be different, but I'm thinking of next year only. UW's offense isn't scaring anybody, Kal is still a year away from challenging the upper North, and WSU and OSU are still WSU and OSU. Oregon is making the PAC 12 title game next year, but the champ could definitely come from the South.
@BallSacked - early days to forecast how Oregon does this fall.
Adams graduates from EWU on June 13 and will be in Eugene on June 14. There are those who think that Oregon's DL will actually be *better* next year, and that the OL should be about the same given that we play the OL in platoon fashion. I have lots of confidence in our line coaches, either way. Adams gives me confidence that Oregon will have a QB capable of managing the game next fall, and who will be able to distribute the ball to the very talented players in the backfield.
I'm going to wait to see if Canton is as good as advertised, he'll be a freshman afterall. Our defensive backs will be young and inexperienced. The biggest worry I have though, is for the third year in a row, Oregon will have the worst linebackers in D1.
Disagree with your take on Stanford. Cajuste and Rector are pretty good. This incoming white WR Trent Irwin is going to be a pain in everyone's ass - watch. BSRYK. I also think Ed McCaffery's son is going to be all-conf level RB at Stanford. He's got size and quickness. Moreover I really like the RB they got out of Portland. He's the biggest RB they've had since Toby Gerhart.Adams is a good pickup, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't show up in Eugene until July, he still has to graduate from EWU. Oregon losses a bunch of OLs and defenders. I think they have 6 returners on both sides. I think they'll still be good, but 10-2 is their ceiling in my opinion with Losses @Sparty and @Stanford. I don't think this Duck team is good enough to simply blow the doors off of teams like ASU, SC or UW, either. Just looking at the talent I think this may be the weakest Duck team since some of Chip's earliest versions, especially on defense.I think there are valid questions with Adams, but saying this means the Duck's have failed at QB development is wishful thinking. Lockie likely sucks. Mahallak is going to be a redshirt freshman coming off an injury and Waller will be a true freshman and is considered raw by the TBSers. Adams is a bridge guy for a team that wants to win another Pac 12 title instead of going through growing pains with a new QB. Great pick up for Oregon.
I think ASU, UCLA, AZ, and USC are huge threats to Oregon next year. My problem with Stanford is that now without Montgomery, they have absolutely nobody on the outside that can threaten teams. They also still lack the bruising tailback needed in their system, maybe a year from now it will be different, but I'm thinking of next year only. UW's offense isn't scaring anybody, Kal is still a year away from challenging the upper North, and WSU and OSU are still WSU and OSU. Oregon is making the PAC 12 title game next year, but the champ could definitely come from the South.
As usually, o/u 5 games until VA is cut in half and AZQuook makes another "Doogasm in full effect, I see" post.
Best part is, this poast is completely accurate because UO probably still beats UW and the Cuogs without Adams, and probably finishes with better overall record as well.
"Beat Oregon, nothing else matters"
Yup.
Maybe it's just abundance, but I find it fascinating how some of you are more excited about a potential Oregon drop off than a potential rise in Husky football. Hate to break it to you, but even if Oregon flounders, Stanford is still better than you, and Kal (crazy I know) is improving, and not that far behind you. After that, there's 4 teams in the South that are better than UW. Oregon falling, would be sure nice for you to see, but unless you get your shit together, it's not going to help you one bit.
Having a realistic shot at beating Oregon is what gets people excited (because nothing else matters).
You Ducks are getting nervous because:
- Warshington is actually serious about football and has a good coach
- Kelly is gone and the replacement is coasting off of his success.
Disagree.
Peterman had a very mixed first year at UW. I guess the argument is that he kind of wrote off year one as rebuilding, but I don't understand the logic that goes into that.
I haven't seen any significant indicators of regression by Helfrich.
As usually, o/u 5 games until VA is cut in half and AZQuook makes another "Doogasm in full effect, I see" post.
Best part is, this poast is completely accurate because UO probably still beats UW and the Cuogs without Adams, and probably finishes with better overall record as well.
"Beat Oregon, nothing else matters"
Yup.
It's funny how you're constantly shitting out "Beat Oregon, nothing else matters" when the pico-second Adams commits you go on and post it on a husky message board.
Quook.
http://youtu.be/c1f7eZ8cHpM
https://twitter.com/vadams_qb/status/564843753173975040
our cute little ducks have become quite rabid since they got bucked in the eye
I always knew we would be able to troll ducks again I just had no idea it would happen so soon.
Vernon Adams beat* Washington, nothing else matters.
If I were a duck fan I'd point out that Oregon could beat Washington with Cyler Miles as their quarterback