Bitcoin up 34.1% in February
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
It's painfully obvious that you haven't even studied it for 15 minutes.
Buck is just here to fuck.Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
Not a target rich environment if you were into grown up women.Buck is just here to fuck.Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
If I can't hand it to you for something I want to buy when stuff goes sideways it's not for me. I realize in everyday life it's a big hindrance but I'm not in on it at this point.
Last edited:
Derek pretty much nailed it as usual!Buck is just here to fuck.Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
Great, so you can apply that to our last president too right? Actually, you can apply this quite of a few of our ex-presidents, why is this only a problem for you now??Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
Why can't you address Biden?Great, so you can apply that to our last president too right? Actually, you can apply this quite of a few of our ex-presidents, why is this only a problem for you now??Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
Because your a dem, a liar and a moron you are unaware that almost every conservative and whatever Race calls himself today on the Tug have heavily criticized the Republican leadership for overspending. However, whether it was either Bush or Trump, their opponent criticized them for not spending lots more. Hell, your mentor the dazzler says he voted for barry the commie because he was the more fiscally responsible alternative. So, this is not just a problem for me now. It wasn't me that voted for a dementia patient because they believed Milton Friedman wasn't in charge anymore and that Econ 101 had been repealed. So, go ahead and let us know why we should be pouring money into the Ukraine over the US border, making the US the world's welfare magnet, handicapping US energy production, and putting hundreds of billions into a failed US public education system that turned out morons like yourself. Flail away.Great, so you can apply that to our last president too right? Actually, you can apply this quite of a few of our ex-presidents, why is this only a problem for you now??Zerohedge
Here is what kind of economy our illiterate economist Paul Krugman Buck voted for. As a committed Keynesian commie, Buck can explain the how the GDP multiplier works in his unicorn economy and the impact on Sugar Bowl ticket prices.
I think I've proved my credentials on this thread. Let me know when you can put your ass on the line and deliver a 20%+ gain in 24 hours, thanks!
"You are unaware that almost every conservative and whatever Race calls himself today on the Tug have heavily criticized the Republican leadership for overspending. "
So….these guys aren't voting for Trump then given his spending history? Is that what youre trying to tell me?
"You are unaware that almost every conservative and whatever Race calls himself today on the Tug have heavily criticized the Republican leadership for overspending. "
So….these guys aren't voting for Trump then given his spending history? Is that what youre trying to tell me?
Last edited:
MelloDawg
New Fish
Homerun
Yes, you have proven your credentials, but you need to throw the grenade after pulling the pin instead of sitting on it. So, you are voting for a bought and paid for America hating dementia patient for your still unexplained policy reasons. Those credentials? I'll give you a hint - the dazzler finally stated his reasons - the dementia patient "tightened up NATO" (please review the NATO spending chart below which I already posted and you seem unable to understand) and that the dazzler liked the dementia patients judicial appointments - a race baiting Supreme Court justice who can't define a woman and others who support the key issues of abortion in the 9th month and ignoring the first and second amendment and the 14th amendment on equal protection. So, I'm telling you that I'm voting for Trump on policy reasons that I can articulate including the fact that he supports private sector US business and spending LESS money.
How do I pay someone with Bitcoin?Sending and Receiving a Payment
- Open your wallet app.
- Click on Send Payment or a similar button.
- Enter the amount you want to send.
- Enter the QR code or wallet address of the recipient.
- Click Send or a similar button.
Way to deflect. Either youre against massive deficits or you're not. Not a single republican has run a surplus in my life time. Not Reagan, Not Bush 1, Not Bush 2, Not Trump. Not one. You know what I fuckin hate? When you apply standards on other people that you don't apply on yourself, thats what I fucking hate!! Typical moron Duck fan.Yes, you have proven your credentials, but you need to throw the grenade after pulling the pin instead of sitting on it. So, you are voting for a bought and paid for America hating dementia patient for your still unexplained policy reasons. Those credentials? I'll give you a hint - the dazzler finally stated his reasons - the dementia patient "tightened up NATO" (please review the NATO spending chart below which I already posted and you seem unable to understand) and that the dazzler liked the dementia patients judicial appointments - a race baiting Supreme Court justice who can't define a woman and others who support the key issues of abortion in the 9th month and ignoring the first and second amendment and the 14th amendment on equal protection. So, I'm telling you that I'm voting for Trump on policy reasons that I can articulate including the fact that he supports private sector US business and spending LESS money.
The problem is that if the internet is down, gold doesn't work really well either. My issue with Bitcoin is that there is no hard asset backing it and that it is much more easily stamped out by a fascist government. Gold has a physical limited production limit. Why can't Bitcoin production limits be compromised or the value diluted by government action?
And once again a demonstration of the intelligence of our resident Duck fans.
A moron says what? So, when faced with a choice for more massive deficits - you think that voting for more massive deficits indicates some level of intelligence and judgment? The only reason that Clinton ran a surplus was that Clinton was faced with an actual fiscal conservative in Newt Gingrich as Speaker of the House. I supported Newt. You dems hated him and then slandered him. I'm happy with my standards. You don't seem to have any that you are prepared to discuss.Way to deflect. Either youre against massive deficits or you're not. Not a single republican has run a surplus in my life time. Not Reagan, Not Bush 1, Not Bush 2, Not Trump. Not one. You know what I fuckin hate? When you apply standards on other people that you don't apply on yourself, thats what I fucking hate!! Typical moron Duck fan.Yes, you have proven your credentials, but you need to throw the grenade after pulling the pin instead of sitting on it. So, you are voting for a bought and paid for America hating dementia patient for your still unexplained policy reasons. Those credentials? I'll give you a hint - the dazzler finally stated his reasons - the dementia patient "tightened up NATO" (please review the NATO spending chart below which I already posted and you seem unable to understand) and that the dazzler liked the dementia patients judicial appointments - a race baiting Supreme Court justice who can't define a woman and others who support the key issues of abortion in the 9th month and ignoring the first and second amendment and the 14th amendment on equal protection. So, I'm telling you that I'm voting for Trump on policy reasons that I can articulate including the fact that he supports private sector US business and spending LESS money.