bills packers

dhdawg

New Fish
Seahawks need one GB loss for them to be in position to control their own destiny to get the #1 seed.
Rodgers just threw another pick. Too bad Orton will find some way to lose this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know. The Bills look Pat Hill Tuff... even Orton may not be able to fuck this up.
 
Packers found something with the Cobb in the backfield stuff ... Rodgers is too good to not pull something out of a shit day.
 
Buffalo was FS to throw a fade on 3rd & 5 at midfield with 2+ minutes left. Their defense bailed them out with the safety. Anyway, I like the Packers, but I like it better that their loss is good for the Hawks.
 
BTW, Dallas needs to lose one too.
I think if GB SEA and DAL finish 12-4, Seattle owns the tiebreak

I haven't been keeping a close eye on all the tie-breaker stuff, but the Cowboys did beat the Seahawks. What else factors in if they all end up 12-4?
 
BTW, Dallas needs to lose one too.
I think if GB SEA and DAL finish 12-4, Seattle owns the tiebreak

I haven't been keeping a close eye on all the tie-breaker stuff, but the Cowboys did beat the Seahawks. What else factors in if they all end up 12-4?
They're 6-4 in conference. Seattle also owns a tie breaker in common games over DET
 
BTW, Dallas needs to lose one too.
I think if GB SEA and DAL finish 12-4, Seattle owns the tiebreak

I haven't been keeping a close eye on all the tie-breaker stuff, but the Cowboys did beat the Seahawks. What else factors in if they all end up 12-4?
They're 6-4 in conference. Seattle also owns a tie breaker in common games over DET

Roger! Thanks for the clarification.
 
Seahawks would not win a two team tie breaker with Dallas, but they would win any three team tie breaker even if Dallas is included.

If GB and Detroit both win next week, then the Seahawks would get homefield by winning out, as long as GB and Det do not tie in week 17. And the Seahawks would still get homefield if Dallas does not win out even if GB and Det tie.
 
Back
Top