Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)

[YellowSnow]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the correct counterpoint.

I thought it was a fair and balanced hot take.

 

[YellowSnow]

Victoria Secret then

View attachment 41749

Victoria Secret now

View attachment 41750

Yuck. Still probably a wood on the younger version of her wife.

 

[Swaye]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

 

[dnc]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.

Squarely on brand.

 

[dnc]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

This is the fast strategy, maybe-I'll-get-AIDs-but-have-you-seen-her-she's-worth-it take.

Squarely on brand.

 

[YellowSnow]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.

Squarely on brand.

Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.

 

[dnc]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.

Squarely on brand.

Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.

I wood not call you the biggest atheist on the bored. Tallest maybe.

 

[LebamDawg]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no

 

[Pitchfork51]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

Low rise is about 1000 times better than high rise.

 

[YellowSnow]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no

Darwin made those cheeks.

 

[1to392831weretaken]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no

Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...

 

[PurpleThrobber]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no

Oh god...oh god

 

[LoneStarDawg]

Sad to see how far this bored has fallen

 

[YellowSnow]

Sad to see how far this bored has fallen

Nothing's changed with me. I've always been a prude.

 

[rodmansrage]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

you clearly havent been to many pools in provo....

 

[RaceBannon]

Bunch of Islamophobes here

 

[DerekJohnson]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the slow strategy, play-it-safe take. Never get too low, never get too high.

Squarely on brand.

Ironic that the biggest atheist fag of the board is so biased towards old timey, Judeo-Christian morality.

Hardcore Husky is not for sermon seekers

 

[Tequilla]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

You didn't put that qualifier in ...

I'm strictly going off of a hot woman wearing ...

I'm not looking at those that have no business wearing bottoms regardless of style ... I don't need those images

 

[Doog_de_Jour]

My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

you clearly havent been to many pools in provo....

Au contraire mon ami, my many visits to see @89ute’s wives included a lot of time poolside.



Couldn’t get the other three in the shot.

 

[LebamDawg]

As Yella says in a worst case scenario you take non-cheeky to err on the side of caution, but I've never been known for my caution and let's face it when done right cheeky is as good as it gets. So let's be bold and daring and hope the 300 pound ladies stick to the full cheeks.

looking at that I don't see how anyone could be an atheist, tall? yes, atheist? no

Is this a modified version of the Kirk Cameron divinely inspired banana theory?...

well it inspired the hell out of my banana, if that helps