Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)

Bikini Bottom Pole (2nd attempt)


  • Total voters
    22

YellowSnow

Moderator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
bottom-coverage_881d589b-9bba-45a8-8890-bc7b7722f3f7.jpg

 
Last edited:
Something is fucky with Vanilla, so I deleted the first pole and seeing if a do-over resolves the issue.

@dnc @RaceBannon @PurpleThrobber @chuck
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

veznmz3imbjx.jpeg
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

I appreciate what you're saying DDJ, but surely there have to be other options out there besides cheeky bottoms? Are there not plenty of one piece bathing suits options out there?
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

#MeToo

So @DerekJohnson I have failed you. Last weekend as we were getting ready to launch our inner tubes into the Wakanda River, there was a gaggle of (I think) Korean chicks all in cheeky bottoms getting ready to embark. Had wife and kids with me so no pics. I don't know if you could have maintained comportment with such scenery.
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

#MeToo

So @DerekJohnson I have failed you. Last weekend as we were getting ready to launch our inner tubes into the Wakanda River, there was a gaggle of (I think) Korean chicks all in cheeky bottoms getting ready to embark. Had wife and kids with me so no pics.[/b] I don't know if you could have maintained comportment with such scenery.

View attachment 6409
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

WOOD!
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

In defense of those ladies, women’s fashion and stores tend to force a particular cut or style of garment down your throat whether you like it or not, body type be dammed. I remember when super low rise jeans were all the rage. It was fucking impossible to find any mid-rise (read “normal”) pairs ANYWHERE unless you went for some older brand.

It’s the same thing with swimwear I imagine.

I’m just waiting for this look to come back.

View attachment 41725

I appreciate what you're saying DDJ, but surely there have to be other options out there besides cheeky bottoms? Are there not plenty of one piece bathing suits options out there?

Yes, there are lots of options online (and back in the day, catalog…oh how I loved it in my twenties when the first Victoria Secret Swim would arrive).

But sizing for swimwear is a royal bitch to figure out AND images aren’t always representative of what you actual end up getting.

And you’re right, there are some lovely one piece alternatives out there. I found this one on sale that provides full coverage:

4rvnvi4odtnb.jpeg

Only downside is the weird tan lines.
 
My vote is being suppressed. I want to vote Brazillian.

It's a binary pole. Cheeky vs Non Cheeky.

So here's my take take: 81% of the women I see wearing cheeky bottoms have no fucking bidness going full cheek and it yucks me out. Therefore, for the good of society, we need to return to the puritanical, full bottoms.

This is the correct counterpoint.
 
Back
Top