Big Ten 2026 schedule preview: Changes should reduce West Coast’s frustration

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
Demond Williams Jr. takes a 2-yard loss when Oregon’s Matayo Uiagalelei flushes him from the pocket at the end of the third quarter. The 5th-ranked Oregon Ducks played the Washington Huskies in Big Ten football Saturday, Nov. 29, 2025 at Husky Stadium, in Seattle. (Dean Rutz / The Seattle Times)

Demond Williams Jr. takes a 2-yard loss when Oregon’s Matayo Uiagalelei flushes him from the pocket at the end of the third quarter. The 5th-ranked Oregon Ducks played the Washington Huskies in Big Ten football... (Dean Rutz / The Seattle Times)

Skip Ad


Jon Wilner
By
Jon Wilner

Bay Area News Group

The Big Ten’s 2026 football schedule will be revealed Tuesday and should elicit far less angst than the previous two versions, particularly from the western wing of the sprawling conference.

Commissioner Tony Petitti and his lieutenants heard loudly and clearly the frustrations expressed over imbalances in preparation time — specifically, the frequency with which Washington, Oregon, UCLA and USC played opponents coming off byes.

Other concerns were raised by member schools, prompting the Big Ten to form a subcommittee of athletic directors to offer input on the underlying strategy and advice for the 2026 edition, according to multiple sources.

“We needed to take a look at what we were doing after two years,” a source said.

For the West Coast quartet, byes were atop the list. Oregon coach Dan Lanning addressed the unequal preparation time on several occasions last season. Washington, which faced five opponents that had extra time, was known to be irked, as well.

The issue should be largely, if not entirely resolved with the 2026 conference schedule — not because the Big Ten overhauled its approach but because of the same issue that caused the problem in the first place: the competition calendar.


Because Week 1 is hooked to Labor Day weekend and the holiday comes late this year (Sept. 7), the regular season covers just 13 Saturdays, whereas the 2024 and 2025 seasons spanned 14.

That slight change makes all the difference when it comes to the number of times a given team will face opponents coming off byes.

In a 14-week season, there are two byes per team.

In a 13-week season, there is one.

And in case you hadn’t heard, the Big Ten has 18 schools.

There are 36 instances in which teams are coming off byes in a 14-week season and only 18 instances in a 13-week season.

The 50 percent reduction should limit the instances in which Washington, Oregon, USC and UCLA face far-flung, well-rested opponents.

Most of the 18 schools will encounter one case of unequal preparation time. It’s unavoidable, although the Big Ten attempts to limit the competitive disadvantage by making the team with extra rest play on the road.

Advertising

Skip Ad

A handful might face the issue twice. But four or five occasions? It won’t happen in a 13-week season.

The situation underscores an aspect of schedule-making often overlooked by fans and even head coaches, especially a certain head coach in Los Angeles: Much of the process is beyond the Big Ten’s control.

Crafting a perfectly balanced schedule for 18 teams playing nine conference games across four time zones simply isn’t feasible. There are too many competing dynamics.


The conference must account for coast-to-coast travel, historic rivalries and competitive balance, which includes the sequencing of games.

“Some of it is a shell game because you’re trying to predict the future,” a source said. “When the opponent rotation was set (in 2023), nobody knew Indiana would be good.”

Another factor: The parameters baked into the conference’s $1 billion media rights deal with Fox, CBS and NBC.


Yet another: Restrictions and requests at the campus level, from facility availability to homecoming dates to academic calendars.

As a result, the Big Ten attempts to create a matrix considered satisfactory by as many schools as possible, knowing that a few will have legitimate complaints in a given year. In theory, those complaints are one-offs.

“Not everything is solvable,” a source said. “But feedback has been offered from the schools and media partners alike, and that feedback has been considered.


“We’ve learned a lot over the past two years.”

Additional matters to watch when the schedule is released Tuesday:

— How many big games will be played in September? They cannot all be slotted into the stretch run, after all — it’s neither feasible or smart.

If the Oregon-Penn State matchup from last season is an indication, the second half of September will feature at least one duel between heavyweight teams.

— To what extent will the Big Ten implement an NFL model in which marquee matchups are strategically scheduled on Saturdays with the greatest opportunities for exposure?


For example, the conference already announced the Indiana-Ohio State showdown for Oct. 17, which coincides with a relatively light weekend of games in the SEC.

— Based on the opponent rotation created three years ago, USC plays each of the other West Coast schools in 2026. Same for Oregon. Washington and UCLA miss each other, but both play the Trojans and Ducks.

— Last, the kickoff times for the early-season games and full lineup of Friday matchups will be announced in the spring.




Jon Wilner: jwilner@bayareanewsgroup.com. Jon Wilner has been covering college sports for decades and is an AP top-25 football and basketball voter as well as a Heisman Trophy voter. He was named Beat Writer of the Year in 2013 by the Football Writers Association of America for his coverage of the Pac-12, won first place for feature writing in 2016 in the Associated Press Sports Editors writing contest and is a five-time APSE honoree.
 
Can we just go back to a West Coast conference? This is stupid and ridiculous. With the right commish, it would work fine.
It wouldn't. The media rights deal they turned down was half of the base B1G deal, and that was WITH USC and UCLA. We?re in an arms race. I agree that multiple things need to change. This should be football only, for starters. And second, fuck non revenue sports and fuck title IX.
 
It wouldn't. The media rights deal they turned down was half of the base B1G deal, and that was WITH USC and UCLA. We?re in an arms race. I agree that multiple things need to change. This should be football only, for starters. And second, fuck non revenue sports and fuck title IX.
Without the LA Schools ESPN offered 30m which would have been a third of what the B10 final year of their current deal.

The final bids after Colorado left was 20M from which would have put the Pac at just half of even the Big12 and ACC, let alone a third and just 20% of the P2.

There is no commish going to overcome that financial difference in not just fb and bb but all sports at UW, and if there was, they sure as hell aren't going to waste that unicorn talent in the Public Sector instead of the private sector where the would make 25x their salary
 
It wouldn't. The media rights deal they turned down was half of the base B1G deal, and that was WITH USC and UCLA. We?re in an arms race. I agree that multiple things need to change. This should be football only, for starters. And second, fuck non revenue sports and fuck title IX.
Fair enough, but Warshington is only getting half a share until 2032 or something IIRC
 
The reason USC and Michigan refused to sign the investment funding is that it extended the grant of rights. When the current one expires in a few years it's going to be absolute chaos.
 
The reason USC and Michigan refused to sign the investment funding is that it extended the grant of rights. When the current one expires in a few years it's going to be absolute chaos.
1769558131059.webp



1769558178276.webp



1769558209146.webp

1769558234078.webp


Here me out....
 

Attachments

  • 1769558035410.webp
    1769558035410.webp
    16.1 KB · Views: 3
  • 1769558067125.webp
    1769558067125.webp
    19.9 KB · Views: 3
Back
Top