Big Brother is watching your Fakebook and XXXXXXXX

[Sledog]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

He learned it from the commie queer illegal Obunghole.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

You want top or bottom bunk?

 

[PurpleThrobber]

As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

You want top or bottom?

Preemptive edit

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

As ever @HHusky just wants a full CCP style surveillance state where any and all opposition is sent to a gulag.

You want top or bottom bunk?

Goes for the edit too. I'm versatile.

 

[HHusky]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Looks like the dems favorite authority on white supremacy has determined that retweeting the tweets of leftards is illegal white supremacist hate speech and the same with saying women can't be men. We will need the dazzler, the line authority to weigh in why this is happening. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
https://instapundit.com/

 

[TurdBomber]

Speech has consequences.

The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.

Nobody needs the security of Big Brother more than @HHusky the Cop Hater.

 

[Bendintheriver]

T

Speech has consequences.

The all liberty, no responsibility gang is outraged.

H thinks busybody bureaucrats ought to monitor Mike the cop's opinions on BLM.

"[/b]purporting to represent the Town. "[/b]

If they had the "correct" ideology, they wouldn't care

Inoffensive speech wouldn't matter to the City?

No shit, Einstein.

Critical thinkers know any form of DEI dogma is offensive.

Lol there’s no critical thinking. Critical thinking would have been to look at the facts and proof I posted the other day on the other channels and would have had an open mind to it!!

No what you have here is political rage and believing what you want to hear!

Imagine that a self proclaimed "critical thinker" would believe that Trump colluded with russians when in fact it was his own candidate that did.

Defending rats who voted for a President who clearly has sold influence to our enemies for cash.

Defending a President who has been caught lying 100+ times over his 40 year political career. "Corn Pop". A plagiarizing POS.

A rat president who ruined the life of an innocent man by claiming he was drunk when he was in a car accident with his wife and daughter.

Do I need to go on to prove what a fucking idiot this "husky buck" is?

Too many words bro. I fell asleep after 2 sentences. Just assumed it was the typical political rage post.

Ahh the "critical thinker" admits that words and reading are hard for him.

You have diagnosed the problem. Now go get yourself some remedial education you dumbass.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.

 

[HHusky]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.

Vote 'em out.

But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.

Vote 'em out.

But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.

I live 100 miles away.

People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights.

 

[WestlinnDuck]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.

Vote 'em out.

But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.

I live 100 miles away.

People got fired simply for criticizing BLM and other leftist causes a few years ago. My favorite local sports talk guy got canned just for that. I understand it if it's public and they threaten others, or use slurs. The government doesn't have the right and should not be engaged in policing the political opinions of its public employees. It's the work of busy body, SJW, loser bureaucrats who are trying to move up and get attention. Don't complain when you lose even more rights.

BLM and antifa are overtly violent communist organizations. They have no moral superiority to being a Nazi. But Team Dazzler doesn't believe in equal justice under the law and so opposing open borders, the sexual mutilation of children and unlimited abortion gets you labeled a white supremacist and getting cancelled.

 

[HHusky]

Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.

You girls really need to re-read 1984[/i].

 

[RaceBannon]

Your employer reading the stuff you choose to make public isn't fascism, no matter how hysterical you get.

You girls really need to re-read 1984[/i].

Everyone here knows your a raging hypocrite who likes it when your team is doing the censoring

Fuck off

 

[Pitchfork51]

I fully support firing teachers and such if they are blm/hamas supporters publicly

 

[TurdBomber]

The Bill of Rights are no longer anything that will stop the Government from infringing upon them.

It’s probably the top feature that will define the legacy of 46.

Which part of the Bill of Rights says speech has no consequences?

It's not some SJW bureaucrat's job to regulate if Mike the fireman says he likes Trump on Facebook. You know this. You're just arguing out of boredom, like you do every day.

Whether it's a good use of time and funds is a different issue. You said it was unconstitutional. Thanks for conceding your error.

It's overreach. 1984. What is the line? Remember when people got fired for criticizing BLM in 2020?

They claim the line is purporting to represent the town. Perfectly legitimate to argue they are going beyond that and/or to argue it’s not a good use of resources.

They don't want people who support Trump or rightfully claim that chicks can't have dicks representing Gilbert.

Vote 'em out.

But don't whine that "Big Brother" reads statements you choose to publish.

Of course you can't imagine better uses of tax dollars than spying on employees.

Tell me you're a fascist without telling me you're a fascist. Shithead.

 

[TXDawg]

Seems like a place full of totally normal, well-balanced people.