Bet your house Stormy Daniels edition.

georgiaduck

georgiaduck

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam
I have a running bet with a liberal friend of mine - If you had to bet your house on an outcome.

This week, Does Trump get convicted?

I say hung jury. Not enough evidence to convict, yet there will still be four or five folks on the jury who want him convicted regardless.
 
They are all NY loony lefties. May not be Americans like our resident commie cucks. Play for the opposing team.
 
Other than zero proof, this has been stacked up against Trump from the beginning.
All rat jury. A far left rat judge who clearly favored one side over the other, its in NY, the press in NY is heavily against everything Trump so if you listen to radio, watch local NY news, read NY papers, etc, as a New Yorker you are fed only one perspective.
They will find him guilty is my guess. After the last trial where there was zero evidence, only one clearly certifiable accuser with zero evidence, and a very liberal and biased judge, how can anyone trust a court in NYC?
 
Last edited:
Bendintheriver said:
Other than zero proof, this has been stacked up against Trump from the beginning.
All rat jury. A far left rat judge who clearly favored one side over the other, its in NY, the press in NY is heavily against everything Trump so if you listen to radio, watch local NY news, read NY papers, etc, as a New Yorker you are fed only one perspective.
They will find him guilty is my guess. After the last trial where there was zero evidence, only one clearly certifiable accuser with zero evidence, and a very liberal and biased judge, how can anyone trust a court in NYC?
Click to expand...
Sounds like that would be a rough day for you.
 
MelloDawg said:
Bendintheriver said:
Rough day for me? I will be a rough day for America. It will be one more corrupt act by rats.
Click to expand...
I think the best way to avoid a rigged judicial system is not to commit crimes. What do you think?
Click to expand...
Mello this is all made up stuff. Feds turned it all down said nothing there. Educate your dumb ass. Here's what Brag is doing.
"When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first brought charges against Donald Trump in March 2023, the legal theory behind the indictment remained remarkably unclear. Bragg had charged Trump under New York Penal Law § 175.10, falsifying business records in the first degree. The falsification of business records alone is a misdemeanor under § 175.05—but Bragg had boosted the charge to a felony by alleging that Trump fudged the records with the “intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.” But what other crime? The indictment didn’t say." 
Charting the Legal Theory Behind People v. Trump
 
Last edited:
georgiaduck said:
I have a running bet with a liberal friend of mine - If you had to bet your house on an outcome.

This week, Does Trump get convicted?

I say hung jury. Not enough evidence to convict, yet there will still be four or five folks on the jury who want him convicted regardless.
Click to expand...
What is the bet? Your house but not really? I don't understand. At least put 5 on it.
 
it must be sad knowing that when you played the mellophone, it wasn’t actually the gayest you ever were
 
MelloDawg said:
Bendintheriver said:
Rough day for me? I will be a rough day for America. It will be one more corrupt act by rats.
Click to expand...
I think the best way to avoid a rigged judicial system is not to commit crimes. What do you think?
Click to expand...
I know I am pissing in the wind even responding to mello the idiot, but mello, please describe for us what crime Trump committed.
Once you give us the details on exactly what he is being charged with, I will have another question for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top