White men have looked at this attack on being white and shrugged
Better hope that doesn't change
Better hope that doesn't change
Bad news for the Demokkkkrats
- Thread starter PurpleThrobber
- Start date
Called this one years ago.
Jammer says they are legit. The media looked into it
I wonder if the family of that fat Antifa chick who had a heart attack and died when the crazy drove his car into people will sue SPLC for funding the event that killed her?
HHusky
Active poster
Talk about overplaying your hand.
You’re not even in the game, Margaret.
TurdBomber
Active poster
How's that Obama cock taste, Sally?
lol struggling
Note the attempt to frame it as law enforcement
Weak shit
Note the attempt to frame it as law enforcement
Weak shit
Already posted it but info is coming on so fast it’s difficult to keep up.
Here’s the rebuttal to that laughable defense.
Saw that argument on a friend’s timeline this morning.
Talking points distributed.
“But the FBI has infiltrated for years!!!”
JFC.
It’s a de facto admission that the SPLC is a front for a “non-profit” that is controlled by the FBI. Never would have been investigated had Trump not won and picked Kash “The Disruptor” Patel to rebuild this failed, corrupt agency.
Paying for staged actions, and then asking people to donate to fight those actions, is criminally fraudulent. That taxpayer funds were funneled through to the racist to be racists should be unacceptable, which is why the Dem media is not touching this one other than like USA Today is doing by muddying the conversation with nonsense.
Democrats should have been nicer to Blondie
What a disaster she was as AG. Her allowing the Florida prosecution of George Zimmerman was always a huge red flag.
HHusky
Active poster
paying for information vs. funding racism vs. representations about the use of donor funds
It’s not a crazy theory of criminal conduct in my opinion. Like I say, LIPO.
I have no idea whether donors feel hoodwinked. Some will probably file suit. Class action?
My discomfort with jumping on the SPLC bandwagon has always been that they paint with an awfully broad brush. I might agree with them 90% of the time, but the “hate group” label is a damning thing, so I think you have to be cautious with its use. I have family who have donated to them, but I don’t give to the SPLC for this reason.
However, “Unite the Right” wasn’t a fever dream. It actually took place. The gals calling it a “false flag” are the same gals who told us ANTIFA stormed the capitol.
It’s not a crazy theory of criminal conduct in my opinion. Like I say, LIPO.
I have no idea whether donors feel hoodwinked. Some will probably file suit. Class action?
My discomfort with jumping on the SPLC bandwagon has always been that they paint with an awfully broad brush. I might agree with them 90% of the time, but the “hate group” label is a damning thing, so I think you have to be cautious with its use. I have family who have donated to them, but I don’t give to the SPLC for this reason.
However, “Unite the Right” wasn’t a fever dream. It actually took place. The gals calling it a “false flag” are the same gals who told us ANTIFA stormed the capitol.
Word salad time
HHusky
Active poster
I’m not retracting that. Daddy has a lot to be grateful for.