AZ Audit Finds 74,000 Ballots Returned and Counted in 2020 Election with NO RECORD of Being Sent Out

That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
 
Last edited:
That's the issue with mail in, no chain of custody, that's why it is so hard to prove fraud, it's inherent in the system, it's also why HR1 has Mail voting in it, the Democrats know they stole 2020 from that and want it permanent.
Click to expand...

But we need more of this. To want fair elections is to be racist.
 
it is all fake news and, as usual, I await @RaceBannon Mello downvoting before I make up my mind
 
I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
 
HH will tell you it didn't happen.
Click to expand...

Right you are. It didn't happen.

Why does everybody say you're so dumb?
Click to expand...

Mail in voting fraud 100% happened and happens every election that has it. Its impossible to track. That's why my lib poli Sci professor hated it. Zero chain of custody.
 
I think it was Penn that had 200K of the same. No effect on the election. Miniscule voter fraud. Not big at all. Most secure election ever. If you were a democrat candidate anyway.
Click to expand...

https://nbcnews.com/politics/elections/pennsylvania-court-tosses-state-s-mail-voting-law-n1288170

Pennsylvania just broke their constitution. Not a big deal. Quite common really

A Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s mail voting law Friday morning, saying voters must amend the state constitution before such legislation is legal.

The state immediately appealed the ruling to the state Supreme Court, meaning the law will remain in effect during the appeal process. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is composed of five Democrats and two Republicans.

In her ruling earlier Friday, Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top