Aubbie?

The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

I do. So does Ole Miss.
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...
Yes. The national champions from last year disagree.

They played 12 freshmen and rotated between 3 and 4 freshmen starters per week and 8 or more on the 2 deeps.

I will take a young team and a natty over experienced redshirt juniors all-around.

 
How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.
 
How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.
Click to expand...
Ole Miss teenage boy stocking superiority guy here. Coach Blindside and his staff are extremely well liked by the kids for one. Also, they had that #1 recruit's older brother which is the reason they got baby bro. Last year was a confluence of lucky connections and good recruiting, kind of like last year's UW hoops could have been if Romar knew how to close.

Also, the boosters really stepped up. Hotty Toddy!

 
Last edited:
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
Click to expand...

It's a shame that Washington is the only program in the country that suffers from attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc.
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
Click to expand...

Recruiting their replacements, is on the coach.

HTH

 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
Click to expand...

Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?

You're better than that.
 
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
Click to expand...

It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
Click to expand...

well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
Click to expand...

Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?

You're better than that.
Click to expand...
disagree

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top