Arizona was the tougher opponent...

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

Ok, stalker boy.
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions

He’s on IPA #3 and he’s a lightweight.
 
Even I think so, this is the game we have all been waiting for since the toss up game in Seattle ~ these are two good teams, bring it on....
 
Last edited:
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions

Seems convenient.
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.

Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...
 
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.

Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...

The IPA is making you drift off.
 
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.
 
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard
 
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard

They’ve been in the Championship game so many times it’s hard to remember the years they weren’t there
 
Last edited:
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard

They’ve been in the Championship game so many times it’s hard to remember the years they weren’t there

I'll keep track so you don't have to
 
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.
 
Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.

More conspiracy theories from haie.
 
Back
Top